Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Med ; 15(9): 1558-68, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24828968

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop metrics to assess opioid prescribing behavior as part of the evaluation of the Extended-Release/Long-Acting (ER/LA) Opioid Analgesic Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). DESIGN: Candidate metrics were selected using published guidelines, examined using sensitivity analyses, and applied to cross-sectional rolling cohorts of Medicare patients prescribed with extended-release oxycodone (ERO) between July 2, 2006 and July 1, 2011. Potential metrics included prescribing opioid-tolerant-only ER/LA opioid analgesics to non-opioid-tolerant patients, prescribing early fills to patients, and ordering drug screens. RESULTS: Proposed definitions for opioid tolerance were seven continuous days of opioid usage of at least 30 mg oxycodone equivalents, within the 7 days (primary) or 30 days (secondary) prior to first opioid-tolerant-only ERO prescription. Forty-four percent of opioid-tolerant-only ERO episodes met the primary opioid tolerance definition; 56% met the secondary definition. Fills were deemed "early" if a prescription was filled before 70% (primary) or 50% (secondary) of the prior prescription's days' supply was to be consumed. Five percent (primary) and 2% (secondary) of episodes had more than or equal to two early fills during treatment. At least one drug screen was billed in 14% of episodes. Stratified analyses indicated that older patients were less likely to be opioid tolerant at the time of the first opioid-tolerant-only ERO prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators propose three metrics to monitor changes in prescribing behaviors for opioid analgesics that might be used to evaluate the ER/LA Opioid Analgesics REMS. Low frequencies of patients, particularly those >85 years, were likely to be opioid tolerant prior to receiving prescriptions for opioid-tolerant-only ERO.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical, Continuing , Narcotics/administration & dosage , Oxycodone/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Male , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Narcotics/analysis , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Oxycodone/analysis , Oxycodone/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 178(6): 962-73, 2013 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23652165

ABSTRACT

Given the increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) found with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine, both active surveillance and end-of-season analyses on chart-confirmed cases were performed across multiple US vaccine safety monitoring systems, including the Medicare system, to evaluate the association of GBS after 2009 monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccination. Medically reviewed cases consisted of H1N1-vaccinated Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized for GBS. These cases were then classified by using Brighton Collaboration diagnostic criteria. Thirty-one persons had Brighton level 1, 2, or 3 GBS or Fisher Syndrome, with symptom onset 1-119 days after vaccination. Self-controlled risk interval analyses estimated GBS risk within the 6-week period immediately following H1N1 vaccination compared with a later control period, with additional adjustment for seasonality. Our results showed an elevated risk of GBS with 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccination (incidence rate ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 5.11; attributable risk = 2.84 per million doses administered, 95% confidence interval: 0.21, 5.48). This observed risk was slightly higher than that seen with previous seasonal influenza vaccines; however, additional results that used a stricter case definition (Brighton level 1 or 2) were not statistically significant, and our ability to account for preceding respiratory/gastrointestinal illness was limited. Furthermore, the observed risk was substantially lower than that seen with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/chemically induced , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Diseases/complications , Aged , Female , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/classification , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/immunology , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Miller Fisher Syndrome/chemically induced , Miller Fisher Syndrome/classification , Miller Fisher Syndrome/epidemiology , Miller Fisher Syndrome/etiology , Poisson Distribution , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...