One Question, Multiple Answers: Biochemical and Biophysical Screening Methods Retrieve Deviating Fragment Hit Lists.

Fragment-based lead discovery is gaining momentum in drug development. Typically, a hierarchical cascade of several screening techniques is consulted to identify fragment hits which are then analyzed by crystallography. Because crystal structures with bound fragments are essential for the subsequent hit-to-lead-to-drug optimization, the screening process should distinguish reliably between binders and non-binders. We therefore investigated whether different screening methods would reveal similar collections of putative binders. First we used a biochemical assay to identify fragments that bind to endothiapepsin, a surrogate for disease-relevant aspartic proteases. In a comprehensive screening approach, we then evaluated our 361-entry library by using a reporter-displacement assay, saturation-transfer difference NMR, native mass spectrometry, thermophoresis, and a thermal shift assay. While the combined results of these screening methods retrieve 10 of the 11 crystal structures originally predicted by the biochemical assay, the mutual overlap of individual hit lists is surprisingly low, highlighting that each technique operates on different biophysical principles and conditions.

Acceleration of Binding Site Comparisons by Graph Partitioning.

The comparison of protein binding sites is a prominent task in computational chemistry and has been studied in many different ways. For the automatic detection and comparison of putative binding cavities the Cavbase system has been developed which uses a coarse-grained set of pseudocenters to represent the physicochemical properties of a binding site and employs a graph-based procedure to calculate similarities between two binding sites. However, the comparison of two graphs is computationally quite demanding which makes large-scale studies such as the rapid screening of entire databases hardly feasible. In a recent work, we proposed the method Local Cliques (LC) for the efficient comparison of Cavbase binding sites. It employs a clique heuristic to detect the maximum common subgraph of two binding sites and an extended graph model to additionally compare the shape of individual surface patches. In this study, we present an alternative to further accelerate the LC method by partitioning the binding-site graphs into disjoint components prior to their comparisons. The pseudocenter sets are split with regard to their assigned phyiscochemical type, which leads to seven much smaller graphs than the original one. Applying this approach on the same test scenarios as in the former comprehensive way results in a significant speed-up without sacrificing accuracy.

Large-scale mining for similar protein binding pockets: with RAPMAD retrieval on the fly becomes real.

Determination of structural similarities between protein binding pockets is an important challenge in in silico drug design. It can help to understand selectivity considerations, predict unexpected ligand cross-reactivity, and support the putative annotation of function to orphan proteins. To this end, Cavbase was developed as a tool for the automated detection, storage, and classification of putative protein binding sites. In this context, binding sites are characterized as sets of pseudocenters, which denote surface-exposed physicochemical properties, and can be used to enable mutual binding site comparisons. However, these comparisons tend to be computationally very demanding and often lead to very slow computations of the similarity measures. In this study, we propose RAPMAD (RApid Pocket MAtching using Distances), a new evaluation formalism for Cavbase entries that allows for ultrafast similarity comparisons. Protein binding sites are represented by sets of distance histograms that are both generated and compared with linear complexity. Attaining a speed of more than 20 000 comparisons per second, screenings across large data sets and even entire databases become easily feasible. We demonstrate the discriminative power and the short runtime by performing several classification and retrieval experiments. RAPMAD attains better success rates than the comparison formalism originally implemented into Cavbase or several alternative approaches developed in recent time, while requiring only a fraction of their runtime. The pratical use of our method is finally proven by a successful prospective virtual screening study that aims for the identification of novel inhibitors of the NMDA receptor.

Extraction of protein binding pockets in close neighborhood of bound ligands makes comparisons simple due to inherent shape similarity.

Methods for comparing protein binding sites are frequently validated on data sets of pockets that were obtained simply by extracting the protein area next to the bound ligands. With this strategy, any unoccupied pocket will remain unconsidered. Furthermore, a large amount of ligand-biased intrinsic shape information is predefined, inclining the subsequent comparisons as rather trivial even in data sets that hardly contain redundancies in sequence information. In this study, we present the results of a very simplistic and shape-biased comparison approach, which stress that unrestricted cavity extraction is essential to enable unexpected cross-reactivity predictions among proteins and function annotations of orphan proteins.

Extended Graph-Based Models for Enhanced Similarity Search in Cavbase.

To calculate similarities between molecular structures, measures based on the maximum common subgraph are frequently applied. For the comparison of protein binding sites, these measures are not fully appropriate since graphs representing binding sites on a detailed atomic level tend to get very large. In combination with an NP-hard problem, a large graph leads to a computationally demanding task. Therefore, for the comparison of binding sites, a less detailed coarse graph model is used building upon so-called pseudocenters. Consistently, a loss of structural data is caused since many atoms are discarded and no information about the shape of the binding site is considered. This is usually resolved by performing subsequent calculations based on additional information. These steps are usually quite expensive, making the whole approach very slow. The main drawback of a graph-based model solely based on pseudocenters, however, is the loss of information about the shape of the protein surface. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient modeling formalism that does not increase the size of the graph model compared to the original approach, but leads to graphs containing considerably more information assigned to the nodes. More specifically, additional descriptors considering surface characteristics are extracted from the local surface and attributed to the pseudocenters stored in Cavbase. These properties are evaluated as additional node labels, which lead to a gain of information and allow for much faster but still very accurate comparisons between different structures.