Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Open Med (Wars) ; 10(1): 50-56, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28352677

ABSTRACT

European Society of Cardiology Guidelines cite results of meta-analysis that the use of calcium channel blockers results in fewer angina episodes per week vs. long-acting nitrates. Moreover, we listed 12 reasons more to prefer amlodipine over long-acting nitrates, especially in stable angina pectoris patients with arterial hypertension. It may be the way to decrease polypharmacy without loosing efficacy. Some important advantages of amlodipine versus long-acting nitrate(s) are: amlodipine also treats hypertension, it helps reducing hypertensive target organ damages (e.g. left ventricular hypertrophy) and prevents morning blood pressure surge. Moreover, amlodipine can be given once daily (which improves adherence), it produces neither tolerance nor rebound, it has less side effects.

2.
Europace ; 7(4): 374-9, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15944096

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of our study was to establish the efficiency of fibrin sealant in the prevention of pocket related complications in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation who are receiving anticoagulant treatment. METHODS: The study was performed on 40 and 41 patients prospectively randomized into treatment and control groups who underwent pacemaker implantation procedure between January 2002 and July 2004 at the Pacemaker Center - Clinical Centre Nis, Serbia. Both groups of patients were receiving anticoagulant treatment with either heparin or warfarin. Surgical procedures between the groups differed only in the application of fibrin sealant prior to wound closure in the treatment group. RESULTS: In the treatment group, there were no pocket related complications while in the control group six patients (14.63%) had minor haematomas that required no treatment. Four patients (9.76%) had significant haematomas (two patients were treated conservatively while the other two needed reintervention). The INR in the treatment group was 2.76+/-0.85 and in the control group 2.65+/-0.79 (P=ns). In the follow-up period (2-27 months) no late complications were registered in either group. CONCLUSION: Fibrin sealant is an effective haemostatic agent. The results obtained in our study show that the administration of fibrin sealant in patients receiving anticoagulant treatment eliminates postoperative haematomas after pacemaker implantation.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Fibrin Tissue Adhesive/therapeutic use , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Pacemaker, Artificial , Prostheses and Implants , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Aged , Female , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hematoma/prevention & control , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Warfarin/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...