[Automated speech analysis can distinguish frontotemporal dementia from depression: a pilot study]. / Geautomatiseerde spraakanalyse bij onderscheiden van frontotemporale dementie en depressie.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia from a depression is challenging. Recent development of automated speech analyses might add to diagnostic. AIM: To investigate the value of automated speech analyses in differentiating bvFTD from a depressive disorder. METHOD: A semistructured interview was recorded in 15 patients with bvFTD, 15 patients with a depressive disorder and 15 healthy controls, which was transcribed and analysed. Acoustic and semantic values were extracted and classified using machine learning. RESULTS: Acoustic values showed an 80% accuracy for differentiating bvFTD from depressive disorder and semantic values showed an 70.8% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Acoustic as well as semantic values show significant differences between bvFTD and depressive disorder. In automated speech analyses researches should consider privacy matters as well as possible confounders like age, sex and ethnicity. This study should be repeated in a larger population.

[A 51-year-old man with primary progressive aphasia]. / Een 51-jarige man met primaire progressieve afasie.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a form of dementia in which brain circuits responsible for language and speech show progressive impairments. Based on consensus criteria PPA is divided into 3 main variants: a nonfluent/agrammatic, a semantic and a logopenic variant. Each variant has specific clinical characteristics, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, and is associated with different neuropathological findings. We describe a 51-year-old man with neuropsychiatric symptoms and progressive language disturbances. The diagnosis PPA was established after an extensive work-up in a psychiatric clinic. We describe which factors contributed to this complex diagnostic process and discuss why knowledge of this disorder is relevant for psychiatrists.

[Frontotemporal dementia diagnoses within the psychiatric practice: pitfalls and practical tools]. / Diagnostiek van frontotemporale dementie in de psychiatrische praktijk: handvatten en valkuilen.

BACKGROUND: The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) strongly resembles primary psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, a bvFTD mimic may occur, without neurodegenerative aetiology. AIM: To offer psychiatrist clinical tools for making or ruling out a bvFTD diagnosis. METHOD: To present the results of the first prospective cohort study on bvFTD patients and primary psychiatric patients. Results are discussed within the context of the international literature. RESULTS: Frontotemporal atrophy on imaging confirms a suspected bvFTD diagnosis. Merely fulfilling the bvFTD clinical criteria, with or without frontotemporal hypometabolism on functional imaging, may also result from primary psychiatric disorders or the bvFTD-phenocopy syndrome. A high level of stereotypy, hyperorality, a low level of depressive symptoms, impaired social cognition or absent insight increases the probability of bvFTD. Biomarker or genetic tests and follow-up are recommended. CONCLUSIONS A bvFTD diagnosis should be made multidisciplinary. Without the confirmation of atrophy or genetics, great reserve in making the diagnosis is in place and careful analyses for psychiatric aetiologies is advised.

Psychiatric diagnoses underlying the phenocopy syndrome of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.

INTRODUCTION: The frontotemporal dementia (FTD) consortium criteria (2011) emphasise the importance of distinguishing possible and probable behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD). A significant number of possible patients with bvFTD do not show functional decline and remain with normal neuroimaging over time, thus exhibiting the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome. A neurodegenerative nature is unlikely but an alternative explanation is missing. Our aim was to detect psychiatric conditions underlying the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome after extensive evaluation. METHODS: We included patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome whereby patients with probable bvFTD served as a control group. Patients had to have undergone both neurological and psychiatric evaluation. Their charts were reviewed retrospectively. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, psychiatric and psychological conditions associated with the clinical syndrome were determined in both groups and their relative frequencies were compared. RESULTS: Of 181 suspected bvFTD cases, 33 patients with bvFTD phenocopy syndrome and 19 with probable bvFTD were included. Recent life events, relationship problems and cluster C personality traits were the most prevalent psychiatric/psychological conditions. The frequency of these conditions was higher in the group of patients with the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome (n=28) compared to the probable bvFTD group (n=9) (χ(2) p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study thoroughly exploring psychiatric causes of the bvFTD phenocopy syndrome, revealing that in most cases multiple factors played a contributory role. Our study gives arguments for neurological and psychiatric collaboration when diagnosing bvFTD. Prompt diagnosis of treatable psychiatric conditions is to be gained.