[A toddler with nightly vomiting and pain in the abdomen]. / Een kleuter met nachtelijk braken en buikpijn.

A 4-year-old boy was referred to the emergency department with four days of nightly vomiting after ingestion of a marble. Abdominal X-ray showed the marble in the antrum of the stomach. The marble was successfully removed by endoscopy. X-rays detect 86% of all glass objects and should therefore be considered as diagnostic option by ingestion of a marble.

Duloxetine in patients with central neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord injury or stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

The mechanisms underlying central neuropathic pain are poorly understood. Pain inhibitory mechanisms including sertononergic and norepinephrine systems may be dysfunctional. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial we evaluated the effects of duloxetine on pain relief (spontaneous pain and evoked pain), tolerability, health status, and quality of life in patients with central pain related to cerebrovascular lesions or spinal cord lesions. At baseline and eight weeks following start of treatment subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity (primary efficacy variable), quantitative sensory testing, health status and quality of life (secondary efficacy variables). Forty-eight patients received escalating doses of either duloxetine (60 and 120mg/day) or matching placebo capsules. In both groups, patients started with 1 capsule per day. If pain relief was insufficient, patients were titrated to a higher dose. A trend towards a decrease in mean pain score after eight weeks was observed for duloxetine treatment (p=0.056). Duloxetine alleviated dynamic (p=0.035) and cold allodynia (p<0.001) significantly better than placebo. Tactile pain and pressure pain thresholds did not improve significantly. The duloxetine group showed a significant improvement for the bodily pain domain of the SF36 (p=0.035). No significant differences were observed in the other domains of the SF36, the Pain Disability Index, and the EQ-5D. While this trial showed no significant effect on pain intensity, duloxetine revealed a biologic effect. It would be worthwhile to suspend our judgement and to perform more studies to evaluate the role of duloxetine in modulation of the symptoms of central neuropathic pain.

Pregabalin in patients with central neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a flexible-dose regimen.

The effective treatment of patients suffering from central neuropathic pain remains a clinical challenge, despite a standard pharmacological approach in combination with anticonvulsants and antidepressants. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effects of pregabalin on pain relief, tolerability, health status, and quality of life in patients with central neuropathic pain caused by brain or spinal cord injuries. At baseline and 4 weeks after the start of treatment subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity measured by visual analog scale, health status (Pain Disability Index and EQ-5D) and quality of life (SF-36). Forty patients received escalating doses of either pregabalin (150, 300, and 600mg/day) or matching placebo capsules. In both groups, patients started with 1 capsule per day (either 150mg of pregabalin or placebo). If pain relief was insufficient, patients were titrated to a higher dose. There was a statistically significant decrease in mean pain score at endpoint for pregabalin treatment, compared with placebo (P=0.016). Follow-up observation showed no significant difference in Pain Disability Index scores between the two groups. The pregabalin group, however, showed a statistically significant improvement for the EQ-5D. Pregabalin treatment led to a significant improvement in the bodily pain domain of the SF36. In the other domains, more favorable scores were reported without reaching statistical significance. Pregabalin, in a flexible-dose regime, produced clinically significant reductions in pain, as well as improvements in health status in patients suffering from severe central neuropathic pain.

Iontophoretic administration of S(+)-ketamine in patients with intractable central pain: a placebo-controlled trial.

The efficacy of 50 and 75 mg S(+)-ketamine administered daily by an iontophoresis-assisted transdermal drug delivery system was tested against placebo in a randomized, double-blind design in 33 patients with central neuropathic pain. At baseline and 1 week after the start of treatment subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity measured by visual analog scale (VAS), health status (Pain Disability Index and EQ-5D) and quality of life (SF-36). Safety assessment included incidence and intensity of adverse events. No significant differences in pain scores (VAS) were observed between the ketamine groups and placebo during the course of the trial. Corrected for baseline levels, daily 50 mg S(+)-ketamine did not improve patient's health status or quality of life compared with placebo treatment. However, daily 75 mg S(+)-ketamine showed significant improvements on the Pain Disability Index, on the EQ-5D, and on the SF-36 except for the role-physical functioning and general health perception. Iontophoretic administration of S(+)-ketamine was well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events (mild and transient in nature, resolving spontaneously). Iontophoretic administration of S(+)-ketamine was not more effective than placebo treatment in reducing pain scores in patients with severe central neuropathic pain. However, iontophoretic administration of 75 mg S(+)-ketamine improved the health status and the quality of life in these patients.

Neuropathological findings after continuous intrathecal administration of S(+)-ketamine for the management of neuropathic cancer pain.

Questions have been raised about the potential neurotoxicity of the neuraxial use of ketamine although ketamine and its active enantiomer S(+)-ketamine have been used intrathecally and epidurally (caudally) for the management of perioperative pain and in a variety of chronic pain syndromes. Clinical experience following neuraxial administration of S(+)-ketamine has been documented without reference to local central nervous system toxicity following this approach. In addition, there are no preclinical safety data regarding stability, compatibility, and neurotoxicity on intrathecal use of single S(+)-ketamine or combinations of S(+)-ketamine, morphine, bupivacaine, and clonidine. In the present case, the continuous intrathecal administration of S(+)-ketamine, in combination with morphine, bupivacaine, and clonidine resulted in adequate pain relief in a patient suffering from intractable neuropathic cancer pain. However, postmortem observation of the spinal cord and nerve roots revealed severe histological abnormalities including central chromatolysis, nerve cell shrinkage, neuronophagia, microglial upregulation, and gliosis. Based on our results, neuraxial administration of S (+)-ketamine cannot be recommended for clinical practise before a systematic study of toxicology of neuraxial S(+)-ketamine in animals or humans has been performed.

Plasma concentrations of meperidine and normeperidine following continuous intrathecal meperidine in patients with neuropathic cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal administration of meperidine, an opioid with local anesthetic activity, can induce analgesia in patients with intractable cancer pain. However, continuous intrathecal administration may result in the accumulation of normeperidine, responsible for central nervous system toxicity. METHODS: Ten patients with neuropathic cancer pain, not responding to conventional opioid therapy, were treated with continuous intrathecal administration of meperidine. In all patients, plasma concentrations of meperidine and normeperidine were measured the first days after the start of treatment. Visual analog scale scores were recorded to evaluate pain relief. Quality of life was assessed before and 3 weeks following the start of intrathecal treatment. RESULTS: In three patients the plasma concentrations of meperidine and normeperidine increased rapidly. In one patient the plasma normeperidine concentration was higher than the meperidine concentration. One patient demonstrated transient symptoms suggestive for central nervous system excitation. Three weeks following the start of treatment, seven patients were available for evaluation of their quality of life. Pain relief and overall quality of life improved during the intrathecal treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that continuous intrathecal administration of meperidine alone, or in combination with clonidine, can provide significant pain relief in patients with poor pain control despite pharmacological treatment. However, accumulation of meperidine and normeperidine resulting in central nervous system toxicity may occur during this treatment.

Treatment of neuropathic cancer pain with continuous intrathecal administration of S +-ketamine.

The effective treatment of patients suffering from neuropathic cancer pain remains a clinical challenge. When patients experience either insufficient analgesia or problematic side-effects after opioid administration, intrathecal administration of morphine and other medications such as bupivacaine and clonidine may offer significant advantages. Additionally, ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-Aspartate-receptor antagonist is able to alter pain perception at the spinal level. Because of the potential neurotoxicity after neuraxial use of racemic ketamine, intrathecal administration of the preservative-free active compound, S (+)-ketamine may be a valuable alternative. In this paper, we present a patient with severe neuropathic cancer pain successfully treated by continuous intrathecal infusion of morphine, bupivacaine, clonidine and S (+)-ketamine. Moreover, quality of life measurements before and 3 weeks after the start of spinal treatment revealed an improvement in pain relief and a higher overall quality of life. No clinical signs of neurologic deficit were observed during spinal treatment with S (+)-ketamine. However, the continuous intrathecal administration of S (+)-ketamine should be considered as the last resort because there are no preclinical safety data with relevant concentrations on intrathecal use of S (+)-ketamine.

[Invasive infection with Moraxella catarrhalis in two children with lymphatic leukemia and granulocytopenia]. / Invasieve infectie met Moraxella catarrhalis bij twee kinderen met lymfatische leukemie en granulocytopenie.

In two young children with leukaemia, a girl and a boy aged 5 and 4 years, respectively, an invasive infection due to Moraxella catarrhalis was diagnosed at the time of granulocytopenia. They were treated with antibiotics. The first child developed pneumonia and recovered, the other developed severe septic shock and died. M. catarrhalis is a Gram-negative diplococcus, frequently colonising the upper respiratory tract in young children. In childhood this pathogen mainly causes infections such as otitis media and sinusitis, while in adults it primarily causes laryngitis, bronchitis and pneumonia. Immunocompromised patients or patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease have an increased risk of severe infections.