European Society of Coloproctology: guidelines for the management of diverticular disease of the colon.

AIM: The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. METHODS: The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than 90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with < 90% agreement was discussed in a consensus meeting at the ESCP annual meeting in Vienna in September 2019. Thereafter, the first and the last author drafted the final text of the guideline and circulated it for final approval and for a third and final online voting of rephrased statements. RESULTS: This guideline contains 38 evidence based consensus statements on the management of diverticular disease. CONCLUSION: This international, multidisciplinary guideline provides an up to date summary of the current knowledge of the management of diverticular disease as a guidance for clinicians and patients.

Synchronous pathologic findings in patients with colorectal cancer and preoperative incomplete colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend perioperative complete colonoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to reduce the risk of metachronous carcinoma. Our aim was to verify these recommendations by examining the residual colon of patients with incomplete preoperative colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with the initial diagnosis of CRC and preoperative incomplete or no colonoscopy. Postoperative colonoscopies were investigated to identify synchronous lesions. RESULTS: In two-thirds of the patients, synchronous lesions could be detected. In 78% of the cases, the lesion was located proximal of the endpoint of the initial colonoscopy and therefore undiscovered. Two-thirds of the synchronous lesions were adenomata. CONCLUSIONS: Complete perioperative colonoscopy in patients with CRC should be performed to reduce the rate of metachronous carcinoma. Postoperative completion of preoperative insufficiently colonoscoped patients is recommended.

Microbial Spectrum of Intra-Abdominal Abscesses in Perforating Crohn's Disease: Results from a Prospective German Registry.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscesses [IAAs] are common life-threatening complications in patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. In addition to interventional drainage and surgical therapy, empirical antibiotic therapy represents a cornerstone of treatment, but contemporary data on microbial spectra and antimicrobial resistance are scarce. METHODS: We recruited 105 patients with CD and IAAs from nine German centres for a prospective registry in order to characterize the microbiological spectrum, resistance profiles, antibiotic therapy and outcome. RESULTS: In 92 of 105 patients, microbial investigations of abscess material revealed pathogenic microorganisms. A total of 174 pathogens were isolated, with a median of 2 pathogens per culture [range: 1-6]. Most frequently isolated pathogens were E. coli [45 patients], Streptococcus spp. [28 patients], Enterococci [27 patients], Candida [13 patients] and anaerobes [12 patients]. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors and quinolones were observed in 51, 36 and 35 patients, respectively. Seven patients had multiple-drug-resistant bacteria. Thirty patients received inadequate empirical treatment, and this was more frequent in patients receiving steroids or immunosuppression [37%] than in patients without immunosuppression [10%: p = 0.001] and was associated with a longer hospital stay [21 days vs 13 days, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: Based on antimicrobial resistance profiles, we herein report a high rate of inadequate empirical first-line therapy for IAAs in CD, especially in patients receiving immunosuppression, and this is associated with prolonged hospitalization.

[Diverticulitis : Domain of conservative or drug therapy?] / Divertikulitis : Domäne der konservativen bzw. medikamentösen Therapie?

Increasing interest in diverticular disease by the scientific community in the last 10-15 years has resulted in an increased number of publications. Among other things, nonevidence-based therapeutic paradigms were tested in randomized, controlled therapy studies. The importance of surgery in the therapy of diverticulitis has diminished in recent years; in particular, it has no role in the treatment of diverticulitis types 1a, 1b, and 2a according to the Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD) treated successfully by conservative means. Surgery has only a subordinate role in recurrent type 3b diverticulitis according to the CDD. Diverticulitis is therefore increasingly treated using conservative or drug therapy. However, only the classic, established antibiotics are currently available as effective drugs for the treatment of diverticular disease. However, these are also decreasing in significance. Over 90% of patients with type 1a/1b diverticulitis can be safely treated according to current data without the use of antibiotics. It is possible that type 2a diverticulitis will also be successfully treated without antibiotics in the future. Substances such as rifaximin, mesalazine, or probiotics, which were tested above all in patients with chronic recurrent forms (CDD type 3a/3b), have not yet been established.

Patient Education in a 14-month Randomised Trial Fails to Improve Adherence in Ulcerative Colitis: Influence of Demographic and Clinical Parameters on Non-adherence.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent observational studies document that non-adherence to mesalamine therapy during remission is frequent. We aimed to investigate patient impact of patient education using objective assessments of adherence. METHODS: A 14-month randomised, prospective clinical trial of adherence to mesalamine was conducted in 248 patients with ulcerative colitis [UC], Colitis Activity Index [CAI] ≤ 9, receiving standard care [n = 122] versus a standardised patient education programme [n = 126]. Primary endpoint was adherence at all visits (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] urine levels). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (inflammatory bowel disease questionnaise [IBDQ]), disease activity, partial adherence, and self-assessment of adherence. RESULTS: Patient allocation was well balanced. Baseline non-adherence was high in quiescent/mildly active UC [52.4%] without difference between the groups (52.4% of patients in the education group versus 52.5% in the standard care group [p = 0.99]). No difference between the intervention group and standard care was seen in IBDQ, partial adherence, self-assessment of adherence, or therapy satisfaction at all visits. We suggest a model in which individual risks for non-adherence are driven by patients with young age, short disease duration, and low education levels. CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence is frequent in a population with quiescent/mildly active UC. Although more than 25% of the population was not in remission at the various time points, no relationship between disease activity and adherence was seen over the 14-month observation period. Physicians should maximise their efforts to motivate high-risk patients for adherence. Future trials should use objective exposure assessments to examine the impact of continuous education and consultations on the background of individual risks to develop non-adherence.

Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine versus placebo in the prevention of diverticulitis recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the efficacy of mesalazine in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of mesalazine granules in the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis after acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trials (SAG-37 and SAG-51) investigated mesalazine granules in patients with prior episodes (<6 months) of uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomised to receive either 3 g mesalazine once daily or placebo (SAG-37, n=345) or to receive either 1.5 g mesalazine once daily, 3 g once daily or placebo for 96 weeks (SAG-51, n=330). The primary endpoint was the proportion of recurrence-free patients during 48 weeks (SAG-37 and SAG-51) or 96 weeks (SAG-51) of treatment. RESULTS: Mesalazine did not increase the proportion of recurrence-free patients over 48 or 96 weeks compared to placebo. In SAG-37, the proportion of recurrence-free patients during 48 weeks was 67.9% with mesalazine and 74.4% with placebo (P=.226). In SAG-51, the proportion of recurrence-free patients over 48 weeks was 46.0% with 1.5 g mesalazine, 52.0% with 3 g mesalazine and 58.0% with placebo (P=.860 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo) and over 96 weeks 6.9%, 9.8% and 23.1% respectively (P=.980 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo). Patients with only one diverticulitis episode in the year prior to study entry had a lower recurrence risk compared to >1 episode. Safety data revealed no new adverse events. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine was not superior to placebo in preventing recurrence of diverticulitis.

[Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease]. / Biosimilars in der Behandlung chronisch entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen.

After the expiry date of the patent protection for Infliximab in 2013, the biosimilar CT­P13 was approved for indications in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in adults as well as in children. The approval has been based on two randomized clinical studies indicating equivalence for the biosimilar with regard to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, as well as side-effects. The clinical experience since, in addition to multiple non-randomized studies, indicate a comparable efficacy and immunogenicity of the Infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in inflammatory bowel disease. Thus, the introduction of the biosimilar as primary therapy seems to be justified. Tight monitoring of the safety of biosimilars with regard to efficacy and side effects has to be ensured.

[Current position on Vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease]. / Vedolizumab bei Colitis ulcerosa und Morbus Crohn: eine Standortbestimmung.

Vedolizumab, the first drug in the class of anti-integrin molecules, is newly approved for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and can be prescribed in Germany since mid-2014. By a specific receptor binding a relatively gut-selective mode of action was achieved without the known side effects of the systemic immunosuppression of the anti-TNF-alpha antibodies. According to the present data the safety profile of Vedolizumab appears to be more favorable than that of the anti-TNF- alpha therapy. Vedolizumab is suitable for induction therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, however the kinetic of response compared with the anti-TNF-alpha antibodies seems to be slower. For maintenance therapy the Vedolizumab data show a deep and sustained remission in patients initially responding to induction therapy with a lower loss of efficacy in the long-term treatment known from the anti-TNF-alpha therapy. On the basis of currently available data the efficacy of Vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis appears to be slightly better than in Crohn's disease.

Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine (Salofalk granules) for uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon--a placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Robust evidence regarding medical intervention for symptomatic uncomplicated colonic diverticular disease (DD) is sparse. AIM: To investigate mesalazine (Salofalk granules) in this setting. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, 6-week trial, patients were randomised to mesalazine 1000 mg three times daily or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in lower abdominal pain to week 4 (baseline defined using pain score from 7 days pre-treatment). RESULTS: Median change in lower abdominal pain with mesalazine vs. placebo was -37 (n = 56) vs. -33 (n = 61) [P = 0.374; 95% CI (-11; 4)] in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and -41 (n = 40) vs. -33 (n = 51) [P = 0.053; 95% CI (-18; 0)] in the per-protocol (PP) population, i.e. the primary endpoint was not significantly different. Post hoc adjustment for confounding factors ('baseline pain intensity', 'baseline symptom score (Brodribb)', and 'localisation of diverticula in the descending colon') resulted in P = 0.111 [ITT, 95% CI (-15.4; 1.6)] and P = 0.005 [PP, 95% CI (-19.7; -3.5)]. Between-group differences increased using pain score on day 1 as baseline, and reached significance for the PP population [mesalazine -42, placebo -26, P = 0.010; 95% CI (-25; -3)]. Median change in combined symptom score from baseline to week 4 was 257 mm with mesalazine vs. 198 mm with placebo [P = 0.064; 95% CI (-3; 105)]. More placebo-treated patients received analgesic/spasmolytic concomitant medication (34.4% vs. mesalazine 21.4%), indicating improved pain relief with mesalazine (P = 0.119). Safety was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: A daily dose of 3.0 g mesalazine may relieve pain during a symptomatic flare of uncomplicated DD. In this, the first placebo-controlled double-blind trial in acute uncomplicated DD, mesalazine showed promising therapeutic efficacy.

Predictive factors for an uncomplicated long-term course of Crohn's disease: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Predictive factors for a mild course of Crohn's disease (CD) may have therapeutic consequences, but as yet have not been identified. AIMS: To identify baseline factors that predict mild CD and design a predictive scoring system. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study of newly diagnosed CD patients allocated to mild CD (no therapy, mesalazine only, or mesalazine with a single initial short course of low-dose prednisone) or moderate CD (all other patients including resected patients). RESULTS: 162 patients (median follow-up 43 months) were analyzed: 47 mild CD and 115 moderate CD. For mild CD versus moderate CD, mean age at first diagnosis was higher (41.1 versus 33.9 years, p=0.02), mean C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was lower (1.6 versus 3.6 mg/L, p<0.01), and perianal lesions were less frequent (0% versus 10.4%, p=0.02). The combined incidence of complications (stenosis, any type of fistula, extraintestinal complications or fever) was 21.3% in mild CD versus 35.7% in moderate CD (p=0.07). A scoring system based on age, CRP, endoscopic severity (adapted Rutgeert's score), perianal lesions and combined incidence of complications was developed which can predict a mild prognosis at the initial diagnosis, giving patients the chance of simplified therapy and accelerated step-up in the event of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately a third of CD patients experience a mild disease course and require only basic therapy. A possible scoring system to predict mild CD which may avoid overtreatment and unnecessary risks for the patient and costs is suggested.

Remission of refractory Crohn's disease by high-dose cyclophosphamide and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, up to 10% of patients with severe Crohn's disease (CD) remain refractory to conventional treatment. Limited evidence from pilot trials suggests that high-dose immunosuppression and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (autoPBSCT) may induce remission in these patients, but there is substantial controversy regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. AIM: To address this issue, a monocentre phase I/II trial of autoPBSCT was performed in patients with refractory CD in our hospital. METHODS: Here, we report on the outcome of 12 patients with refractory CD treated with autoPBSCT. Briefly, CD34(+) -selected PBSCs were harvested after mobilisation therapy with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Later, immunoablative conditioning therapy with high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by autoPBSCT was applied and clinical and endoscopic responses were analysed after a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (range 0.5-10.3 years). RESULTS: PBSC harvest following mobilisation chemotherapy was successful in 11/12 patients and resulted in a clinical and endoscopic improvement in 7/12 patients. Subsequent conditioning and autoPBSCT were performed in nine patients and were relatively well tolerated. Among those, five patients achieved a clinical and endoscopic remission within 6 months after autoPBSCT. However, relapses occurred in 7/9 patients during follow-up, but disease activity could be controlled by low-dose corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSION: Immunoablation by cyclophosphamide and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is safe and effective to induce remission of refractory Crohn's disease, and should be further evaluated in randomised controlled trials.

[Rational and efficient diagnosis in different stages of Crohn's disease]. / Rationale und rationelle Diagnostik in unterschiedlichen Krankheitsphasen des Morbus Crohn.

The treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease has become more complex in recent years through the introduction of various immunosuppressive agents as well as the approval of monoclonal antibodies. Patients receiving such treatment must be carefully monitored. National and international guidelines define a diagnostic and therapeutic context for the practitioner, but can only partially respond to specific questions on the procedure for individual patients. Within the framework of a project initiated by Abbott entitled "IBD ahead" 34 German IBD experts have elaborated concrete proposals for the utility of clinical symptom assessment, endoscopy and the use of laboratory parameters including foecal markers of inflammation. Furthermore, we discuss the significance of conventional X-rays, computed tomography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance tomography. These recommendations are illustrated by case studies from everyday practice in the participating centres.