Implementing enhanced extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for CPR (ECPR) in the emergency department.

Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a very poor prognosis, with survival rates at around 10%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients in refractory arrest, known as ECPR, aims to provide perfusion to the patient whilst the underlying cause of arrest can be addressed. ECPR use has increased substantially, with varying survival rates to hospital discharge. The best outcomes for ECPR occur when the time from cardiac arrest to implementation of ECPR is minimised. To reduce this time, systems must be in place to identify the correct patient, expedite transfer to hospital, facilitate rapid cannulation and ECMO circuit flows. We describe the process of activation of ECPR, patient selection, and the steps that emergency department clinicians can utilise to facilitate timely cannulation to ensure the best outcomes for patients in refractory cardiac arrest. With these processes in place our survival to hospital discharge for OHCA patients is 35%, with most patients having a good neurological function.

Cardiogenic Shock Challenges and Priorities: A Clinician Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is common and survival outcomes have not substantially improved. Australia's geography presents unique challenges in the management of CS. The challenges and research priorities for clinicians pertaining to CS identification and management have yet to be described. METHOD: We used an exploratory sequential mixed methods design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians (medical and nursing) to identify themes for quantitative evaluation. A total of 143 clinicians undertook quantitative evaluation through online survey. The interviews and surveys addressed current understanding of CS, status of cardiogenic systems and future research priorities. RESULTS: There were 143 respondents: 16 (11%) emergency, cardiology 22 (16%), 37 (26%) intensive care, 54 (38%) nursing. In total, 107 (75%) believe CS is under-recognised. Thirteen (13; 9%) of respondents indicated their hospital had existing CS teams, all from metropolitan hospitals, and 40% thought additional access to mechanical circulatory support devices was required. Five (5; 11%) non-tertiary hospital respondents had not experienced a delay in transfer of a patient in CS. All respondents felt additional research, particularly into the management of CS, was required. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians report that CS is under-recognised and further research into CS management is required. Access to specialised CS services is still an issue and CS protocolised pathways may be of value.

ECPR Survivor Estimates: A Simulation-Based Approach to Comparing ECPR Delivery Strategies.

Objective: The number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who may benefit from prehospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is yet to be elucidated. Patient eligibility is determined both by case characteristics and physical proximity to an ECPR service. We applied accessibility principles to historical cardiac arrest data, to identify the number of patients who would have been eligible for prehospital ECPR in Sydney, Australia, and the potential survival benefit had prehospital ECPR been available.Methods: The New South Wales cardiac arrest registry between January 2017 to June 2021 included 39,387 cardiac arrests. We retrospectively defined two groups: 1) possible ECPR eligible arrests that would have triggered activation of a team, and 2) ECPR eligible arrests, those arrests that met ECPR inclusion criteria and remained refractory. Transport accessibility modeling was used to ascertain the number of arrests that would have been served by a hypothetical prehospital service and the potential survival benefit.Results: There were 699 arrests screened as possibly ECPR eligible in the Sydney metropolitan area, 488 of whom were subsequently confirmed as ECPR eligible refractory OHCA. Of these, 38% (n = 185) received intra-arrest transfer to hospital, with 37% (n = 180) arriving within 60 min. Using spatial and transport modeling, a prehospital team located at an optimal location could establish 437 (90%) patients onto ECMO within 60 min, with an estimated survival of 48% (IQR 38-57). Based on existing survival curves, compared to conventional CPR, an optimally located prehospital ECPR service has the potential to save one additional life for every 3.0 patients.Conclusions: A significant number of historical OHCA patients could have benefited from prehospital ECPR, with a potential survival benefit above conventional CPR.

Protocolised Management of Cardiogenic Shock and Shock Teams: A Narrative Review.

Despite advances in therapy, the incidence of cardiogenic shock continues to increase, with significant mortality that has improved minimally over time. Treatment options for cardiogenic shock are complex and time-, resource-, and case volume-dependent, and involve multiple medical specialties. To provide early, more equitable, and standardised access to cardiogenic shock expertise with advanced therapies, cardiogenic shock teams with a protocolised treatment approach have been proposed. These processes have been applied across hospitals into integrated cardiogenic shock networks. This narrative review evaluates the role of cardiogenic shock teams, protocolised and regionalised shock networks, and the main individual components of protocolised shock management approaches.

Expert consensus on training and accreditation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation an international, multidisciplinary modified Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders were used to identify: (1) the core competencies of a training program required to perform in-hospital ECPR initiation (2) additional competencies required to perform pre-hospital ECPR initiation and; (3) the optimal training method and maintenance protocol for delivering an ECPR program. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was undertaken utilising two web based survey rounds and one virtual meeting. Experts rated the importance of different aspects of ECPR training, competency and governance on a 9-point Likert scale. A diverse, representative group was targeted. Consensus was achieved when greater than 70% respondents rated a domain as critical (> or = 7 on the 9 point Likert scale). RESULTS: 35 international ECPR experts from 9 countries formed the expert panel, with a median number of 14 years of ECMO practice (interquartile range 11-38). Participant response rates were 97% (survey round one), 63% (virtual meeting) and 100% (survey round two). After the second round of the survey, 47 consensus statements were formed outlining a core set of competencies required for ECPR provision. We identified key elements required to safely train and perform ECPR including skill pre-requisites, surrogate skill identification, the importance of competency-based assessment over volume of practice and competency requirements for successful ECPR practice and skill maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: We present a series of core competencies, training requirements and ongoing governance protocols to guide safe ECPR implementation. These findings can be used to develop training syllabus and guide minimum standards for competency as the growth of ECPR practitioners continues.

Prehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the available published evidence of the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews an Meta-Analyses guidelines. SETTING: In the prehospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational trials using pre-hospital ECPR in adult patients (>17 years). INTERVENTIONS: Prehospital ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study authors searched Medline, Embase, and PUBMED for all RCTs and observational trials. The studies were assessed for clinical, methodologic, and statistical heterogeneity. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge. The study outcomes were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of means or proportions as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. Four studies were included, with a total of 222 patients receiving prehospital ECPR (mean age = 51 years [95% CI 44-57], 81% of patients were male (CI 74-87), and 60% patients had a cardiac cause for their arrest (95% CI 43-76). Overall survival at discharge was 23.4% (95% CI 15.5-33.7; I2 = 62%). The pooled low-flow time was 61.1 minutes (95% CI 45.2-77.0; I2 = 97%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be low, and the overall risk of bias was assessed to be serious, with confounding being the primary source of bias. CONCLUSION: No definitive conclusions can be made as to the efficacy of prehospital ECPR in refractory cardiac arrest. Higher quality evidence is required.

Early Catheter Ablation Versus Initial Medical Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia Storm.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm is associated with significantly increased morbidity, mortality, and exponential healthcare utilization. Although catheter ablation (CA) may be curative, there are limited data directly comparing outcomes of early CA with initial medical therapy. METHODS: We compared outcomes of patients presenting with VT storm treated with initial CA versus those treated with initial medical therapy during their first storm presentation in an observational study. Retrospective data from the host institution from January 2014 to April 2020 of 129 patients with their first VT storm presentation were analyzed (58 underwent initial CA, 71 underwent treatment with initial medical therapy). Outcomes were compared in follow-up. RESULTS: Median time to initial CA was 6 days. Over a median follow-up of 702 days, patients who underwent initial CA compared with those treated with initial medical therapy had significantly less: (i) VA recurrence (43% versus 92%; P=0.002); (ii) VT storm recurrence (28% versus 73%; P<0.001); (iii) composite end point of death, heart transplant, VT storm recurrence, and VT-related hospitalization (47% versus 89%; P=0.002); (iv) iatrogenic complications (at 12 months: 17% versus 45%; P<0.001); (v) cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (50% versus 89%; P=0.01); (vi) total number of hospitalizations (median 1 versus 4; P<0.001); and (vi) cumulative days in hospital (median 0.5 versus 18; P<0.001). There were no intraprocedural deaths in patients treated with early CA. CONCLUSION: In an observational setting in which patients presenting with storm, early CA appears superior to initial medical therapy in terms of VT recurrence, storm recurrence, iatrogenic complications, cardiovascular hospitalizations, and cumulative days in hospital in follow-up.

Out of hospital cardiac arrest in Western Sydney-an analysis of outcomes and estimation of future eCPR eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with extremely poor outcomes. However, in selected patients extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be an effective rescue therapy, allowing time treat reversible causes. The primary goal was to estimate the potential future caseload of eCPR at historically 'low-volume' extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centres. METHODS: A 3-year observational study of OHCA presenting to the Emergency Department (ED of an urban referral centre without historical protocolised use of eCPR. Demographics and standard Utstein outcomes are reported. Further, an a priori analysis of each case for potential eCPR eligibility was conducted. A current eCPR selection criteria (from the 2-CHEER study) was used to determine eligibly. RESULTS: In the study window 248 eligible cardiac arrest cases were included in the OHCA registry. 30-day survival was 23.4% (n = 58). The mean age of survivors was 55.4 years. 17 (6.8%) cases were deemed true refractory arrests and fulfilled the 2-CHEER eligibility criteria. The majority of these cases presented within "office hours" and no case obtained a return of spontaneous circulation standard advanced life support. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary OHCA registry a significant number of refractory cases were deemed potential eCPR candidates reflecting a need for future interdisciplinary work to support delivery of this therapy.

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A RAND Appropriateness Panel Approach.

BACKGROUND: Current practice in cardiogenic shock is guided by expert opinion in guidelines and scientific statements from professional societies with limited high quality randomized trial data to inform optimal patient management. An international panel conducted a modified Delphi process with the intent of identifying aspects of cardiogenic shock care where there was uncertainty regarding optimal patient management. METHODS: An 18-person multidisciplinary panel comprising international experts was convened. A modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology was used. A survey comprising 70 statements was completed. Participants anonymously rated the appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 to 9: 1 to 3 inappropriate, 4 to 6 uncertain, and 7 to 9 appropriate. A summary of the results was discussed as a group, and the survey was iterated and completed again before final analysis. RESULTS: There was broad alignment with current international guidelines and consensus statements. Overall, 44 statements were rated as appropriate, 19 as uncertain, and 7 as inappropriate. There was no disagreement with a disagreement index <1 for all statements. Routine fluid administration was deemed to be inappropriate. Areas of uncertainty focused panel on pre-PCI interventions, the use of right heart catheterization to guide management, routine use of left ventricular unloading strategies, and markers of futility when considering escalation to mechanical circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: While there was broad alignment with current guidance, an expert panel found several aspects of care where there was clinical equipoise, further highlighting the need for randomized controlled trials to better guide patient management and decision making in cardiogenic shock.

Ventricular Tachycardia Storm Ablation With Pre-Emptive Circulatory Support by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Australian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can provide circulatory support in high-risk patients undergoing drug refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. We report experience using VA-ECMO in a pre-emptive approach for high-risk patients with VT storm and previously ineffective ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four (4) patients with drug refractory ventricular tachycardia (mean age 61±3 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 21±5%) presenting for VT ablation had pre-emptive VA-ECMO. All patients during current admission had VT storm. Pre-ablation, 22 total monomorphic VTs (cycle length 402±69 ms) were induced or spontaneously observed (median of 4, IQR25-75% 1-6). At the end of the procedure, 86% of all inducible VTs were rendered non-inducible. Median hospitalisation following VA-ECMO supported ablation was 5 days (IQR25-75% 3-12). During follow-up (median 138 days [IQR25-75% 57-277]), VT recurred in one patient as an isolated episode reverted by anti-tachycardia pacing. There was a 99% reduction in VT burden post ablation. One (1) patient died of cardiogenic shock within 24 hours whilst still on VA-ECMO, all other patients were successfully weaned off support and discharged. Two (2) patients underwent cardiac transplantation at 199 and 512 days post ablation following implantation of ventricular assist devices for worsening heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-emptive use of VA-ECMO for high-risk patients undergoing catheter ablation for VT storm was found to be effective in maintaining haemodynamic status, and allowing successful mapping and catheter ablation for VT.

The Prolonged Use of VV ECMO Support in COVID-19: A Case Report.

COVID-19 has resulted in unprecedented global health and economic challenges. The reported mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation is high. VV ECMO may serve as a lifesaving rescue therapy for a minority of patients with COVID-19; however, its impact on overall survival of these patients is unknown. To date, few reports describe successful discharge from ECMO in COVID-19 after a prolonged ECMO run. The only Australian case of a COVID-19 patient, supported by prolonged VV ECMO in conjunction with prone ventilation, complicated by significant airway bleeding, and successfully decannulated after forty-two days, is described. VV ECMO is a resource-intense form of respiratory support. Providing complex therapies such as VV ECMO during a pandemic has its unique challenges. This case report provides a unique insight into the potential clinical sequelae of COVID-19, supported in an intensive care environment which was not resource-limited at the time, and adds to the evolving experience of prolonged VV ECMO support for ARDS with a goal to lung recovery.

Assessment of safety and bleeding risk in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for multitrauma patients: A multicenter review.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is the most common form of organ failure following traumatic injury. Previously, there have been concerns regarding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in the trauma setting because of the increased risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications. We sought to examine the management of trauma patients with ECMO and to assess the safety and outcome of its use. METHODS: Data of all patients who experienced a traumatic injury and were supported with ECMO were collected from the five National Respiratory ECMO centers in the United Kingdom over the period from December 2011 to May 2017. Primary outcome variables included 30-day and 6-month mortality and exacerbation of underlying traumatic injury after ECMO commencement. Secondary outcome variables included duration of ECMO support, thrombotic complications, and worsening of intracranial injury. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were identified. The overall hospital mortality was 15%. The incidence of bleeding complications was 50%, the majority of these not requiring intervention. Forty patients underwent surgical management prior to ECMO commencement; only four patients required take-back to the operating theater. There was no significant difference between the bleeding and nonbleeding groups in time of injury to ECMO commencement (median difference, 4.5 days; 95% CI, -3 to 3 days; p = 0.75). There was no statistically significant difference between the bleeding and nonbleeding groups in regard to time to anticoagulation commencement after starting ECMO (median difference, - 1 hour; 95% CI, -48 to 2 hours; p = 0.29) or after trauma (median difference, - 1 day; 95% CI, -4 to 2 days; p = 0.41). Nineteen patients were diagnosed with significant neurological injury. Twelve of these patients were anticoagulated. Two patients died as a direct result of worsening neurological injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of ECMO in trauma patients does not exacerbate primary traumatic injury regardless of anticoagulation commencement and may confer a survival benefit. Neurological injury should not be seen as an absolute contraindication to ECMO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level V.

Bleeding Complications Associated With Percutaneous Tracheostomy Insertion in Patients Supported With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen Support: A 10-Year Institutional Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the bleeding complications associated with percutaneous tracheostomy while a patient is receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygen (VV ECMO) support. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational analysis. SETTING: Single-center, tertiary, academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive patients on VV ECMO over a 10 year-period undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous tracheostomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty percutaneous tracheostomies were performed in patients requiring VV ECMO support over the 10-year period. The authors observed a 40% incidence of bleeding, with 32% of these incidences characterized as minor (self-limiting, localized stomal ooze) and 8% characterized as significant (necessitating surgical control and frequent packing or accompanied by a decrease in hemoglobin >20%). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is associated with percutaneous tracheostomy and is self-limiting in the majority of patients.

Hemodynamic Response After Rapid Sequence Induction With Ketamine in Out-of-Hospital Patients at Risk of Shock as Defined by the Shock Index.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Ketamine is considered a stable induction agent for rapid sequence induction; however, hypotension rates up to 24% are reported. The shock index (shock index=pulse rate/systolic blood pressure [SBP]) may identify patients at risk of adverse hemodynamic change. We investigate whether SBP and pulse rate response to ketamine induction differ when patients are classified as being at risk of shock by their shock index. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of electronically collected vital sign data from patients undergoing rapid sequence induction with ketamine. Patients were grouped into low shock index (shock index <0.9) or high shock index (shock index ≥0.9) preinduction. Pulse rate and SBP were compared between 3 minutes preinduction and for 3 measurements postinduction (3-minute intervals) by repeated-measures ANOVA. Proportions of patients developing hypotension or hypertension are also reported. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were enrolled (81 low shock index, 31 high shock index). Low shock index patients had increased SBP after induction (16 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11 to 21 mm Hg), whereas high shock index patients did not (2 mm Hg; 95% CI -4 to 7 mm Hg). Pulse rate in low shock index patients increased after induction (20 beats/min; 95% CI 16 to 25 beats/min) and remained elevated, whereas in high shock index patients a difference occurred at the second postinduction measurement only (15 beats/min; 95% CI 11 to 18 beats/min). More high shock index patients became hypotensive (26%; 95% CI 12% to 45%) than low shock index ones (2%; 95% CI 0% to 9%), whereas more low shock index patients became hypertensive (40%; 95% CI 29% to 51%) than high shock index ones (13%; 95% CI 4% to 30%). CONCLUSION: After ketamine induction, high shock index patients exhibited blunted hypertensive responses and more frequent hypotension, whereas low shock index patients had sustained increases in pulse rate and SBP.