A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.

Purpose: The aim of this research was to compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] ≥2) for the four biopsy methods: transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB), cognitive transrectal biopsy (COG-TB), fusion transperineal biopsy (FUS-TB), and transperineal template mapping biopsy (TPMB). Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria were as follows: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >2 ng/mL, and/or positive digital rectal examination (DRE), and/or suspicious lesion on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (Pi-RADS) v2.1 ≥ 3 score. In total, 102 patients were enrolled in the study. Biopsies were performed by two urologists. In a single procedure, the first urologist performed a FUS-TB and TPMB followed by second urologist who performed TRUS-GB and COG-TB. All specimens were obtained within a single procedure. Results: The csPCa detection rate and overall cancer detection rate (CDR) per patient were comparable among the respective biopsy methods (p > 0.05). Compared with other biopsy methods, a lower clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) was detected using COG-TB (p = 0.004). The positive cores percentage ratio (p < 0.001) as well as positive cores containing csPCa percentage ratio (p < 0.001) significantly increased for the targeted biopsy methods. The median maximum cancer core length (MCCL; p = 0.52) as well the median for the MCCL of csPCa (p = 0.47) did not differ significantly among the respective biopsy methods. Concordance of the Gleason scores between biopsy and postprostatectomy pathology did not differ significantly among biopsy methods (p = 0.87). For TRUS-GB, FUS-TB, and TPMB, the common predictive factors for csPCa were positive DRE, suspicious lesion on ultrasound and Pi-RADS 5. As for COG-TB, the only predictor was Pi-RADS 5. Conclusion: The targeted methods did not show an increase in detection of csPCa and overall CDR over systematic ones in patients with Pi-RADS ≥3. A lower cisPCa was detected using COG-TB in comparison with the other methods. The sampling efficiency increased for the targeted biopsy methods, which used only a proportion of positive cores and cores containing csPCa. There was no statistical difference in histology concordance among the biopsies. One common predictive factor of increased csPCa detection for all biopsy methods was Pi-RADS 5.

Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. RESULTS: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and "per patient" did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I2 = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I2 = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate "per patient" between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I2 = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate "per core" [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I2 = 96%]. CONCLUSION: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates.

Bilateral Nephrectomy in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Chronic Renal Failure.

BACKGROUND: In patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and end-stage kidney disease, bilateral nephrectomy (BN) is currently performed predominantly via the laparoscopic approach. We analysed the results of BN depending on the approach and preoperative and perioperative factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study carried out from April 2010 to March 2020, including a total of 142 patients presenting with ADPKD who were treated by BN. Of these, 108 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected to analyse the results. We compared therapeutic outcomes depending on the surgical approach (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and the type of the operation (emergent or elective). RESULTS: Of the 108 eligible patients, 36 (group I) underwent laparoscopic BN and the remaining 72 patients (group II) were subjected to midline laparotomy. Sixty-nine patients underwent elective surgery and 39 endured emergent operations. The most frequent indications (87 patients, 80.6%) for surgical treatment were urinary tract infection and infected cysts. The median length of hospital stay for group I and group II patients amounted to 8 days (IQR: 7.5-9) and 12.5 days (IQR: 9-16.5), respectively (p < 0.001). However, comparing the patients operated on electively, the actual difference in the length of hospital stay was inconsiderable: median 8 days (IQR: 7-9) in group I and 9 days (IQR: 9-11.5) in group II. The median duration of the operation was significantly (p < 0.001) longer in group I amounting to 217.5 min (IQR: 197.5-305) than in group II equalling 115 min (IQR: 107.5-145). The frequency of postoperative complications, lethal outcomes, and blood loss volume did not statistically significantly differ depending on the surgical approach. Only patients operated on emergency underwent releparotomy due to intraoperative large bowel injury. Lethal outcomes (n = 18, 16.7%) after surgery were observed only in emergent patients. Sepsis prior to surgery, systemic inflammation response syndrome (SIRS) with the CRP level above 173 mg/mL, prolonged preoperative antibacterial therapy, and undiagnosed large bowel injury were associated with a lethal outcome after BN. CONCLUSION: The results of open and laparoscopic BN in elective surgery were comparable. Emergency operations for infected renal cysts and SIRS were associated with increased incidence of large bowel injury and lethal outcomes.

Hemiablation of Localized Prostate Cancer by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: A Series of 35 Cases.

Prostate cancer (PrC) is one of the most common tumors diagnosed in men. The detection rate of localized PrC has been dramatically enhanced by screening and the development of visualization methods. There are currently several techniques for focal treatment available, among which the most interesting in our opinion is high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Currently, HIFU hemiablation of PrC is not an established treatment, although evidence of its effectiveness and safety is growing. We have been performing HIFU hemiablation since 2013 and here report our results to add to the evidence on the effectiveness of the technique. Between October 2013 and December 2016, we performed HIFU hemiablation of the prostate for a total of 35 patients with confirmed PrC stage

Evaluation of Prostate HistoScanning as a Method for Targeted Biopsy in Routine Practice.

BACKGROUND: Prostate HistoScanning (PHS) is a tissue characterization system used to enhance prostate cancer (PCa) detection via transrectal ultrasound imaging. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of supplementing systematic transrectal biopsy with up to three PHS true targeting (TT) guided biopsies on the PCa detection rate and preclinical patient assessment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective study involving a cohort of 611 consecutive patients referred for transrectal prostate biopsy following suspicion of PCa. PHS-TT guided cores were obtained from up to three PHS lesions of ≥0.5cm3 per prostate and only one core per single PHS lesion. Histological outcomes from a systematic extended 12-core biopsy (Bx) scheme and additional PHS-TT guided cores were compared. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comparison of PHS results and histopathology was performed per sextant. The χ2 and Mann-Whitney test were used to assess differences. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PHS showed lesions of ≥0.5cm3 in 312 out of the 611 patients recruited. In this group, Bx detected PCa in 59% (185/312) and PHS-TT in 87% (270/312; p<0.001). The detection rate was 25% (944/3744 cores) for Bx and 68% (387/573 cores) for PHS-TT (p<0.001). Preclinical assessment was significantly better when using PHS-TT: Bx found 18.6% (58/312) and 8.3% (26/312), while PHS-TT found 42.3% (132/312) and 20.8% (65/312) of Gleason 7 and 8 cases, respectively (p<0.001). PHS-TT attributed Gleason score 6 to fewer patients (23.4%, 73/312) than Bx did (32.4%, 101/312; p=0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a suspicion of PCa may benefit from addition of a few PHS-TT cores to the standard Bx workflow. PATIENT SUMMARY: Targeted biopsies of the prostate are proving to be equivalent to or better than standard systematic random sampling in many studies. Our study results support supplementing the standard schematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with a few guided cores harvested using the ultrasound-based prostate HistoScanning true targeting approach in cases for which multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is not available.