Implementation of Electrical Auricular Acupuncture and Low Frequency Modulated Electric Current Therapy in Pain Management of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of knee pain. Conservative therapy resources are limited due to adverse effects. Therefore, alternative non-invasive therapy approaches to reduce pain medications are gaining importance. The current study analyses if electrical auricular acupuncture (EAA) or low frequency modulated electric current therapy (LFMECT) could support analgesic treatment. METHODS: In a randomized pilot trial patients with painful knee OA were treated with EAA (group 1) or LFMECT (group 2) additional to standard pharmacological analgesic treatment. In total 19 female and 10 male patients with a mean age of 59.1 years (standard deviation ± 13.6) and a mean BMI of 28.9 kg/m2 (± 5.2) were included. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the groups stratified for age, gender and BMI. Before starting of the active study period and collecting of the initial data on day 1, all patients received a pharmacological analgesic baseline therapy for one week. At the next study stage patients started their randomly assigned treatment protocol for 42 days and final follow-up was set on day 70. Patients recorded their pain intensity (numerical rating scale; NRS) using a standardized patient diary. The pain free walking time in min was recorded and range of motion was assessed. RESULTS: Rescue medication intake was comparable between both groups on day 42 (p = 0.55) and day 70 (p = 0.35). After the active study period (day 42) pain scores decreased significantly in both groups (group 1 p = 0.02; group 2 p = 0.0006). At follow up median pain scores further decreased in group 1 (p = 0.0002) and remained at a low level in group 2 (p = 0.001). Level of pain decreased in about 50% in both groups and was comparable during the study period. Total mean range of motion (ROM) increased in both groups (group 1 p = 0.0003; group 2 p = 0.02). Group 1 had more improvement of mean total ROM compared to group 2 (p = 0.034). Pain-free walking time increased in both groups and was comparable between both groups (p = 0.31). Any adverse effects due to EAA or LFMECT were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Data of the current study indicates that implementation of EAA or LFMECT seems to be beneficial to reduce knee pain and improve knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Seymour fractures: retrospective analysis and therapeutic considerations.

PURPOSE: To analyze the management of Seymour fractures (juxta-epiphyseal fractures of the terminal phalanx of the finger in conjunction with flexion deformity at the fracture site, laceration of the nail bed, and frequently ungual subluxation) and to determine clinical and radiographic results following operative or conservative treatment. METHODS: Clinical and radiological results of 24 skeletally immature patients (7 girls and 17 boys; mean age, 8.5 y) with Seymour fractures were evaluated. Assessment after a mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 1-18 y) included the range of motion, the modified Kapandji index, growth disturbance of the effected digit and nail, pain according to the visual analog scale, and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Nine patients received nonoperative treatment. Operative management included debridement, open reduction, and fixation in 9. Owing to instability, an additional K-wire passing across the distal interphalangeal joint was used in 5. In 1 patient, the nail was removed. All surgically treated patients received a splint and perioperative cephalosporin. Twenty-three patients out of 24 gained full motion (mean, 80°; range, 65°-90°). The average modified Kapandji index was 5.0 for extension and 4.8 for flexion. Long-term minor growth disturbance of the distal phalanx (seen on radiographs at high amplification only) and nail were noted in 5 patients, and solitary nail dystrophies were observed in 6 patients. Nine of the 11 nail growth irregularities were not a relevant cosmetic problem for the patients. Patients' satisfaction assessment revealed a good clinical outcome. There was neither flexion deformity nor infection in our collective. At the 1-year follow-up examination, the average visual analog score was 0.6 (range, 0-2). CONCLUSIONS: According to the literature, the Seymour fracture is an often-underestimated injury, and open cases are prone to infection. Evaluation of the outcome in our collective demonstrated good results with the treatment approaches described. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the management of displaced paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures at our Level I Trauma Centre and to determine clinical and radiographic long-term results following operative treatment. METHODS: Clinical and radiological results of 78 paediatric patients (29 female, 49 male; mean age 5.1 years) with supracondylar humerus fractures, treated from 1992 to 2004, were evaluated. Gartland's classification yielded 32 type II, 44 type III and further two flexion injuries. In all patients the follow-up period exceeded 12 months. Assessment after an average of 8.1 years (1.1-19.5) included neurovascular examination, Flynn's criteria (elbow function and carrying angle), pain, complications (infections, growth disturbances or iatrogenic nerve injuries) and measurement of the humeroulnar angle. RESULTS: According to Flynn's criteria 73 patients (93.5 %) had a satisfactory outcome, while five (6.4 %) were graded as unsatisfactory (two due to cubitus varus and three because of limited elbow motion). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score averaged 0 (range 0-1) and the mean carrying angle measured 8.4° (-8 to 20°), compared to 10.8° on the contralateral side (2-20°). Injury-related complications yielded absent pulses in four (5.1 %), five (6.4 %) primary median, two (2.6 %) primary radial and one (1.3 %) primary ulnar nerve injury. Treatment-related complications included a secondary displacement and one iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Based on primary nerve lesion as a dependent variable, statistical analysis showed that age had a significant influence revealing that older paediatric patients had a significantly higher risk (p = 0.02). Functional outcome as a dependent variable revealed an indirect proportion to the clinical carrying angle, achieving statistical significance (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Crossed pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures is an effective method. Evaluation of the outcome in our study group demonstrated good results with the treatment approach described.

A management algorithm for cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with anterior skull base fractures: detailed clinical and radiological follow-up.

Detailed outcome data for the management of anterior skull base fractures associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is lacking. We present detailed follow-up data of a single-center study using a predetermined algorithm for the management of CSF leakage secondary to traumatic fractures. A number of 138 consecutive patients were included in the analysis; all patients underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning at time of admission with ß(2)-transferrin testing used to confirm CSF leakage. Patients with acute surgical indications were operated as emergent; leaks were repaired at the time of initial surgery in patients with intracranial pressure < 15 cm H(2)O. The remainder of the study population was managed conservatively including use of prophylactic antibiotics; lumbar drainage (LD) catheters were placed in those patients with leakage persisting beyond 48 h. Leaks lasting longer than 5 days underwent microsurgical repair using an intradural bicoronal approach. One-year follow-up assessment included evaluation of neurological status, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and repeat head CT. Twenty eight patients (26.9%) underwent emergent surgery, 15 of whom had simultaneous CSF leak repair, whereas 76 patients (73.1%) underwent delayed CSF leak repair between days 5 and 14. Postoperative meningitis rate was low (1.9%). Postoperative CSF leak (1.9%) was managed by intradural or transnasal endoscopic operation. Comparable rates of anosmia and frontal lobe hypodensities were seen in the surgical and conservatively managed subgroups. The presented algorithm, utilizing prophylactic antibiotics, trial of LD, acute and/or delayed intradural microsurgery, yields favorable outcomes. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the role of prophylactic antibiotics and to better characterize the optimal timing and approach of surgical repair.

Management and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee arthroplasty are a rare but serious complication in clinical practice. In most cases, adequate management of these injuries might constitute a challenging problem. However, the literature provides only few data regarding the treatment and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures, and there are only few classifications available, which might assist in finding an appropriate treatment concept. The purpose of this study was to analyse our experience in the management of interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 23 patients (15 female and eight male, average age: 79.2 years) with an interprosthetic fracture after ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement between 1992 and 2008. For the classification of interprosthetic femoral fractures, the fractures were divided into three types, depending on the fracture site and the adjacency to the prostheses. All patients underwent operative stabilisation, either by lateral plate fixation (n=19), by revision arthroplasty using a long stem (n=2) or by plate fixation and revision arthroplasty (n=2). RESULTS: Referring to the clinical outcome, 16 patients returned to their pre-injury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. In six patients, we saw a relevant decrease of hip or knee function and severe limitations in gait and activities of daily living. We had a mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 78.4 points, and a mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of 71.8 points. Relating to the radiographic outcome, successful fracture healing was achieved in 19 of 22 patients (86%) within 6 months. Failures of reduction and fixation were noted in four (18%) of 22 patients. CONCLUSION: We had a satisfactory outcome following individualised treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement. Compared to the rare data in current literature, we had promising functional result and high rate of bony fusion. Regarding the complexity and challenges in many of these cases, interprosthetic fractures require an adequate analysis of the fracture aetiology and a suitable transfer into the best possible treatment concept.