Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 294(17): 2195-202, 2005 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16264161

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In 1895, Aldred Scott Warthin, MD, PhD, initiated one of the most thoroughly documented and longest cancer family histories ever recorded. The unusually high incidence and segregation of cancers of the colon, rectum, stomach, and endometrium in Dr Warthin's family G was later followed up by his colleagues, most recently by Henry Lynch, MD. Described today as a Lynch syndrome family, family G was last documented in 1971, prior to the modern era of molecular diagnostics. OBJECTIVE: To update family G. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Historical prospective cohort study of family G members from 1895 to 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the frequencies and types of cancers, ages at diagnosis, and presence of the T to G transversion at the splice acceptor site of exon 4 of the mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E coli) (MSH2) gene in family G members. A secondary analysis compared cancer-specific incidence rates in family G with published national and regional cancer incidence rates through the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). RESULTS: Family G now has 929 known descendants of the original progenitor first reported in 1913. Cancers of the colon and rectum (SIR, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.39-4.19) and endometrium (SIR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.92-5.89) continue to predominate in family G. Five of 40 tested members of family G carry the MSH2 T to G mutation; as a result, 15 of their living relatives are at increased risk of developing 1 or more colorectal or Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. In contrast, 97 living members of family G can now be excluded as mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: Within the last decade, molecular diagnostic testing has transformed the care of family G and other Lynch syndrome families in which a pathogenic mutation has been identified.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/history , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Female , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Pedigree , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics
2.
N Engl J Med ; 346(14): 1054-9, 2002 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11932472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is caused by a germ-line mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene and is characterized by the development of hundreds of colorectal adenomas and, eventually, colorectal cancer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs can cause regression of adenomas, but whether they can prevent adenomas is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 41 young subjects (age range, 8 to 25 years) who were genotypically affected with familial adenomatous polyposis but phenotypically unaffected. The subjects received either 75 or 150 mg of sulindac orally twice a day or identical-appearing placebo tablets for 48 months. The number and size of new adenomas and side effects of therapy were evaluated every four months for four years, and the levels of five major prostaglandins were serially measured in biopsy specimens of normal-appearing colorectal mucosa. RESULTS: After four years of treatment, the average rate of compliance exceeded 76 percent in the sulindac group, and mucosal prostaglandin levels were lower in this group than in the placebo group. During the course of the study, adenomas developed in 9 of 21 subjects (43 percent) in the sulindac group and 11 of 20 subjects in the placebo group (55 percent) (P=0.54). There were no significant differences in the mean number (P=0.69) or size (P=0.17) of polyps between the groups. Sulindac did not slow the development of adenomas, according to an evaluation involving linear longitudinal methods. CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of sulindac did not prevent the development of adenomas in subjects with familial adenomatous polyposis.


Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Sulindac/therapeutic use , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Genes, APC , Humans , Male , Mutation , Patient Compliance , Prostaglandins/analysis , Rectum/chemistry , Rectum/pathology , Regression Analysis , Sulindac/adverse effects , Thromboxane B2/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...