Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 229(1-2): 148-54, 2015 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26213379

ABSTRACT

This randomized controlled trial examined the impact of the Coming Out Proud (COP) program on self-stigma, stigma stress, and depression. Research participants who experienced mental health challenges were randomly assigned to a three session COP program (n=51) or a waitlist control (n=75). Outcome measures that assessed the progressively harmful stages of self-stigma, stigma stress appraisals, and depression were administered at pre-test, post-test, and one-month follow-up. People completing COP showed significant improvement at post-test and follow-up in the more harmful aspects of self-stigma compared to the control group. COP participants also showed improvements in stigma stress appraisals. Women participating in COP showed significant post-test and follow-up reductions in depression after COP compared to the control group. Men did not show this effect. Future research should determine whether these benefits also enhance attitudes related to recovery, empowerment, and self-determination.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Power, Psychological , Self Concept , Social Stigma , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged
2.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 37(1): 62-4, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24417232

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Contact-based antistigma programs seemingly have a larger and more sustained impact than educational strategies. Previous qualitative research of advocates with lived experiences yielded 32 key ingredients of contact-based programs comprising 5 categories. This study sought an independent sample's feedback of the 32 ingredients. METHODS: One hundred advocates with lived experience of mental health conditions who have led, coordinated, and/or delivered antistigma presentations completed an online survey to rank importance of key ingredients. RESULTS: Analysis of rank distributions showed most important ingredients in program categories: (a) design: face-to-face presentations, audience discussion; (b) target: specific group identified (e.g., employers), assessment completed with targets to derive stigma change goals relevant to needs; (c) staff: presenters are people with lived experience; (d) message: message includes on the-way-up stories; and (e) evaluation/follow-up: post-presentation follow-up actions discussed with targets. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future research hopes to yield a fidelity measure for contact-based programs.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Mental Disorders/psychology , Social Discrimination/prevention & control , Stereotyping , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation/methods , Qualitative Research
3.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 36(3): 173-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23834612

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A major public health priority has been to eliminate stigma's egregious effects on life opportunities for people with mental illnesses. Research shows contact-based antistigma programs are among the most effective. Such findings call for clarity to define the components of consumer-directed antistigma programs. This article represents community-based participatory research (CBPR) and the first step of a mixed methods design to describe the active ingredients comprising these kinds of programs. METHOD: CBPR investigators developed an interview guide and subsequently facilitated four focus groups to identify key components. Participants included antistigma experts with lived experience. Using grounded theory, two independent raters identified 641 discrete themes. Two additional coders then sorted themes into constructs representing key ingredients of contact-based programs. Coders agreed upon 198 constructs and then grouped them into a hierarchical model of key ingredients in consumer-directed stigma change. RESULTS: Five criteria represent indicators of successful consumer-directed programs: (a) program design-factors necessary for trained presenters to facilitate programs; (b) targeting-tailored presentation congruent with target's goal; (c) staffing-facilitators and leadership are diverse people with lived experience; (d) messaging-presentation discusses struggles and recovery from mental health challenges; and (e) follow-up and evaluation-assessment of sustained audience change. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study identified key ingredients of consumer-directed antistigma programs. Part two of the mixed methods design, a quantitative cross-validation study, will yield a sound fidelity measure.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Health Education/methods , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mentally Ill Persons , Social Discrimination/prevention & control , Social Stigma , California , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Patient Advocacy , Program Development/methods , Qualitative Research , Stereotyping
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...