Kinematic difference and asymmetries during level walking in adolescent patients with different types of mild scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), three-dimensional spine deformation, affects body motion. Previous research had indicated pathological gait patterns of AIS. However, the impact of the curve number on the walking mechanism has not been established. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the gait symmetry and kinematics in AIS patients with different curve numbers to healthy control. RESULTS: In the spinal region, double curves AIS patients demonstrated a smaller sagittal symmetry angle (SA) and larger sagittal convex ROM of the trunk and lower spine than the control group. In the lower extremities, the single curve patients showed a significantly reduced SA of the knee joint in the frontal plane, while the double curves patients showed a significantly reduced SA of the hip in the transverse plane. CONCLUSION: The curve number indeed affects gait symmetry and kinematics in AIS patients. The double curves patients seemed to adopt a more "careful walking" strategy to compensate for the effect of spinal deformation on sensory integration deficits. This compensation mainly occurred in the sagittal plane. Compared to double curves patients, single curve patients unitized a similar walking strategy with healthy subjects.

Comparison of plugin and redundant marker sets to analyze gait kinematics between different populations.

BACKGROUND: Gait model consists of a marker set and a segment pose estimation algorithm. Plugin marker set and inverse kinematic algorithm (IK.) are prevalent in gait analysis, especially musculoskeletal motion analysis. Adding extra markers for the plugin marker set could increase the robustness to marker misplacement, motion artifacts, and even markers occlusion. However, how the different marker sets affect the gait analysis's kinematic output is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of marker sets on the kinematic output during level walking in different populations. RESULTS: In all three planes, there are significant differences (P < 0.05) between marker sets in some kinematic variables at the hip, knee, and ankle. In different populations, the kinematic variables that show significant differences varied. When comparing the kinematic differences between populations using the two marker sets separately, the range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion was only found to be a significant difference using the redundant marker set, while the peak internal rotation at the knee was only found a significant difference using plugin marker set. In addition, the redundant marker set shows less intra-subject variation than the plugin marker set. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study demonstrate the importance of marker set selection since it could change the result when comparing the kinematic differences between populations. Therefore, it is essential to increase the caution in explaining the result when using different marker sets. It is crucial to use the same marker set, and the redundant marker set might be a better choice for gait analysis.

[Biomechanical comparative analysis of screw fixation and cortical endo-button fixation in Latarjet procedure for anterior dislocation of shoulder joint].

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the value of the cortical endo-button as an internal fixator in Latarjet procedure through biomechanical analysis. METHODS: Ten pairs of shoulder joints from 6-7 months old male pigs were selected. Each pair was randomly divided into screw group and endo-button group. A 25% glenoid defect model was created, and the porcine infraspinatus tendon and its associated bone were used to simulate conjoint tendon and coracoid process in human body. The bone grafts were fixed with two 3.5 mm screws and double cortical endo-buttons with high-strength sutures in screw group and endo-button group, respectively. The prepared glenoid defect model was fixed on a biomechanical test bench and optical markers were fixed on the glenoid and the bone block, respectively. Then fatigue test was performed to observe whether the graft or internal fixator would failed. During the test, the standard deviations of the relative displacement between the graft and the glenoid of two groups were measured by optical motion measure system for comparison. Finally the maximum failure load comparison was conducted and the maximum failure loads of the two groups were measured and compared. RESULTS: There was no tendon tear, bone fracture, and other graft or internal fixation failure in the two groups during the fatigue test. The standard deviation of the relative displacement of the screw group was (0.007 87±0.001 44) mm, and that of the endo-button group was (0.034 88±0.011 10) mm, showing significant difference between the two groups ( t=7.682, P=0.000). The maximum failure load was (265±39) N in screw group and (275±52) N in endo-button group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.386, P=0.199). There were 3 ways of failure: rupture at bone graft's tunnel (6/10 from screw group, 3/10 from endo-button group), tendon tear at the cramp (2/10 from screw group, 2/10 from endo-button group), and tendon tear at the internal fixator interface (2/10 from screw group, 5/10 from endo-button group), showing no significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.395). CONCLUSION: Although the endo-button fixation fails to achieve the same strong fixation stability as the screw fixation, its fixation stability can achieve the clinical requirements. The two fixation methods can provide similar fixation strength when being used in Latarjet procedure.

Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part I: A Biomechanical Study of Blocking Superior Facets.

STUDY DESIGN: This is an in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical variations of lumbar spine motor units and that under different moments after screw heads blocking superior-adjacent bilateral facets through the cadaver specimen biomechanical experiment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Facet joint violation by pedicle screws is not a rare adverse event in instrumented lumbar fusion surgery, and one of the most common types is the screw head blocking the superior-adjacent facet. However, its contribution to biomechanical instability at the supradjacent level is unknown. METHODS: The range of motion (ROM) of 12 lumbar spines (L4-S1) were measured in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation for L4/5. All specimens were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the blocking group, each with 6 specimens. Spine were tested on intact and instrumented specimens, respectively. The relative ROM changes were compared between the blocking and control groups. RESULTS: In the blocking group, the supradjacent-level flexion-extension ROM significantly decreased under all moments (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm) relative to the intact spine and a significant decrease in the lateral bending relative ROM was found at 4.5 Nm. In the control group, no significant change of supradjacent-level ROM was found relative to the intact noninstrumented spine at each moment. When performing flexion-extension, the relative ROM change between the 2 groups was significantly different at 4.5 Nm. When performing lateral bending, the relative ROM change between the 2 groups was significantly different at moments of 6.0 and 4.5 Nm. CONCLUSION: When screw heads blocked superior-adjacent bilateral facets, the supradjacent-level flexion-extension ROM and lateral bending ROM decreased. In the long run, this may be a risk of persistent low-back pain due to frequent impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.

MINI: In controls, adjacent-level range of motion (ROM) did not change relative to noninstrumented spine at each moment. In severe violation, flexion-extension and rotation ROM of adjacent vertebrae decreased at each moment (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm); lateral bending ROM decreased at 4.5 Nm. Significant differences in movements were found except lateral bending (7.5 Nm). STUDY DESIGN: This is an in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical variations of lumbar spine motor units after bilateral facet joint severe violation in cadaver specimens and analyze the biomechanics under different moments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of facet joint violation (FJV) is highly variable, and one of the most important factors is the lack of awareness of protection. Until now, the biomechanical effects of FJV remain unclear. METHODS: Biomechanical testing was performed on 12 human cadaveric spines under flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation loading. After intact analysis, pedicle screws were inserted at L5, and the biomechanical testing was repeated. Full range of motion (ROM) at the proximal adjacent levels under different moments was recorded and normalized to the intact (100%) noninstrumented spine. The relative ROM changes were compared between the control and severe violation groups. RESULTS: The adjacent-level ROM (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation) did not change significantly in the control group at each moment (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm) compared with the intact noninstrumented spine. In the severe violation group, the supradjacent-level ROM decreased significantly under all moments relative to the intact noninstrumented spine (P < 0.05) except for the ROM of lateral bending at moments of 7.5 and 6.0 Nm. When comparing the ROM between the two groups, there were significant differences in all movements except lateral bending at 7.5 Nm. CONCLUSION: When superior-segment bilateral facet joints are severely violated by screws, the flexion-extension and axial rotation ROM of adjacent vertebrae decreases at each moment (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm), and the lateral bending ROM decreases at 4.5 Nm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

This is an in vitro biomechanical study. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical variations of lumbar spine motor units after bilateral facet joint severe violation in cadaver specimens and analyze the biomechanics under different moments. The incidence of facet joint violation (FJV) is highly variable, and one of the most important factors is the lack of awareness of protection. Until now, the biomechanical effects of FJV remain unclear. Biomechanical testing was performed on 12 human cadaveric spines under flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation loading. After intact analysis, pedicle screws were inserted at L5, and the biomechanical testing was repeated. Full range of motion (ROM) at the proximal adjacent levels under different moments was recorded and normalized to the intact (100%) noninstrumented spine. The relative ROM changes were compared between the control and severe violation groups. The adjacent-level ROM (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation) did not change significantly in the control group at each moment (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm) compared with the intact noninstrumented spine. In the severe violation group, the supradjacent-level ROM decreased significantly under all moments relative to the intact noninstrumented spine (P < 0.05) except for the ROM of lateral bending at moments of 7.5 and 6.0 Nm. When comparing the ROM between the two groups, there were significant differences in all movements except lateral bending at 7.5 Nm. When superior-segment bilateral facet joints are severely violated by screws, the flexion-extension and axial rotation ROM of adjacent vertebrae decreases at each moment (7.5, 6.0, 4.5 Nm), and the lateral bending ROM decreases at 4.5 Nm. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Effects of Ankle Joint Motion on Pelvis-Hip Biomechanics and Muscle Activity Patterns of Healthy Individuals in Knee Immobilization Gait.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the pelvis-hip biomechanics and trunk and lower limb muscle activity patterns between healthy people walking in two gaits and evaluate the effects of ankle joint motion on these two gaits. The two gaits included walking with combined knee and ankle immobilization and with individual knee immobilization. Ten healthy participants were recruited and asked to walk along a 10 m walk away at their comfortable speeds in the two gaits. Kinematic data, ground reaction force, and electromyography waveforms of trunk and lower limb muscles on the right side were collected synchronously. Compared to individual knee immobilization gait, people walking in the combined knee and ankle immobilization gait increased the range and average angle of the anterior pelvic tilt during the first double support and the single support phase, respectively. The combined knee and ankle immobilization gait also increased the range of hip abduction during the second double support phase. These kinematic alternations caused changes in trunk and lower limb muscle activity patterns. The ankle immobilization increased the range of gluteus maximus activation in the first double support phase, the range of rectus abdominis activation, the average amplitude of rectus femoris activation in the single support phase, and the range of rectus femoris activation in swing phase and decreased the range of and tibialis anterior activation in the first double support phase. The ankle immobilization also increased the average values of proximodistal component in AKI gait during the single support phase. This study revealed significant differences in pelvis-hip biomechanics and trunk and lower limb muscle activity patterns between the two gaits.

Influence of Deviated Centers of Rotation on Kinematics and Kinetics of a Lumbar Functional Spinal Unit: An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND Center of rotation (COR) has been used for assessing spinal motion quality. However, the biomechanical influence of COR deviation towards different directions during flexion-extension (FE) remains largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the alteration in the range of motion (ROM), compressive force, shear force, and neutral zone size (NZ) in a lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU), caused by the deviated COR in different directions during FE. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twelve human cadaveric lumbar FSUs (6 for L2-L3, 6 for L4-L5) were tested in a 6-degree-of-freedom servo-hydraulic load frame. These FSUs were firstly applied a 7.5 Nm pure moment to perform FE to obtain their natural COR during FE. Subsequently, they were subjected to FE around 9 established deviated CORs with 6 Nm cyclical loading. RESULTS It was found that the ROM and NZ increased significantly when the COR moved from the superior plane to the inferior plane for the L2-L3 unit and when the COR located in the superior plane compared with the inferior plane for the L4-L5 unit. The compressive forces for both FSUs demonstrated significant changes caused by COR shift in the same horizontal plane, while the shear forces demonstrated significant changes caused by COR shift in the same vertical plane. CONCLUSIONS The ROM, NZ, and shear force of FSU are sensitive to the vertical COR shift, while the compressive force of FSU is highly sensitive to the horizontal COR shift. Additionally, the kinematics and kinetics of the L2-L3 unit are more sensitive to COR location than those of the L4-L5 unit.

How Height and Weight of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Affect the Spring Locations of Unpowered Energy-stored Exoskeleton.

The paper focused on the effects of body dimensions of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) on the spring locations of unpowered energy-stored exoskeleton (ES-EXO) based on energy-stored element optimization method. The optimal spring locations and muscle activations of patients with different combinations of height and weight were simulated in AnyBody Modeling System. The spring locations of ES-EXO changed slightly with height, and the weight affected the spring locations of S12 and S22 significantly. SCI patients with increasing height propelled themselves forwards by altering the muscle force distribution of latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major and deltoid, generating more obliquus internus abdominis (OI) and rectus abdominis force in support phase and less OI force in swing phase. SCI patients with increasing weight also adopted different distribution of thorax and shoulder muscle forces for ambulation. The patients with larger weight were likely to enhance OI force so as to provide sufficient hip flexion moment in swing phase.

Prediction of the Spinal Musculoskeletal Loadings during Level Walking and Stair Climbing after Two Types of Simulated Interventions in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) continues to be a severe global healthy problem, and a lot of patients would undergo conservative or surgical treatments. However, the improving capacity of spinal load sharing during activities of daily living (ADLs) after interventions is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to quantitatively predict the improvement of spinal musculoskeletal loadings during level walking and stair climbing after two simulated interventions. Material and Methods: Twenty-six healthy adults and seven lumbar disc herniation patients performed level walking and stair climbing in sequence. The spinal movement was recorded using a motion capture system. The experimental data were applied to drive a musculoskeletal model to calculate all the lumbar joint resultant forces and muscle activities of seventeen main trunk muscle groups. Rehabilitation and reconstruction were selected as the representative of conservative and surgical treatment, respectively. The spinal load sharing after rehabilitation and reconstruction was predicted by replacing the patients' spine rhythm with healthy subjects' spine rhythm and altering the center of rotation at the L5S1 level, respectively. Results: During both level walking and stair climbing, the joint resultant forces of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs were predicted to reduce after the two simulated inventions. In addition, the maximum muscle activities of the most trunk muscle groups decreased after simulated rehabilitation and conversely increased after simulated reconstruction. Conclusion: The predictions revealed the different compensatory responses on the spinal load sharing after two simulated interventions, severing as guidance for making preoperative planning and rehabilitation planning.

Continuous lumbar spine rhythms during level walking, stair climbing and trunk flexion in people with and without lumbar disc herniation.

Low back pain(LBP) is one of the most prevalent diseases afflicting people today. Abnormal musculoskeletal loadings during activities of daily living (ADLs) have been deemed to be associated with spine rhythm. But no studies have reported abnormal continuous spine rhythms during ADLs in LBP patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the continuous lumbar spine rhythms and their difference between people with and without lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Twenty-six healthy people and seven patients with LDH were recruited in this study. They performed level walking, stair climbing, and trunk flexion. Active optical markers placed on the landmark of the spinous process and pelvis were captured using motion analysis system to drive a musculoskeletal model to calculate the continuous lumbar spine rhythms. It was found that the lumbar spine rhythm was roughly constant throughout the analyzed cycle in both healthy people and LDH patients during trunk flexion. LDH patients displayed fluctuant lumbar spine rhythms during level walking and stair climbing and significantly higher segmental contributions of the lumbar segments in the lower lumbar region during stair climbing and trunk flexion. In conclusion, there were different compensatory responses to LDH in the continuous lumbar spine rhythms during different ADLs. This study provides a new insight into the abnormal spinal motion in LDH patients.

The Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Spine Loading Characteristics during Trunk Flexion and Two Types of Picking Up Activities.

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the compensatory response of the muscle activities of seventeen major muscle groups in the spinal region, intradiscal forces of the five lumbar motion segment units (MSUs), and facet forces acting on the ten lumbar facet joints in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Twenty-six healthy adults and seven LDH patients performed trunk flexion, ipsilateral picking up, and contralateral picking up in sequence. Eight optical markers were placed on the landmarks of the pelvis and spinal process. The coordinates of these markers were captured to drive a musculoskeletal model to calculate the muscle activities, intradiscal forces, and facet forces. The muscle activities of the majority of the seventeen major muscle groups were found increases in LDH patients. In addition, the LDH patients displayed larger compressive forces and anteroposterior forces on all the five lumbar MSUs and more lumbar facet inventions on most facet joints. These findings suggest that the LDH patients demonstrate compensatory increases in the most trunk muscle activities and all spinal loads. These negative compensatory responses increase the risk of the aggravation of disc herniation. Therefore, treatment should intervene as earlier as possible for the severe LDH patients.

The Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Musculoskeletal Loadings in the Spinal Region During Level Walking and Stair Climbing.

BACKGROUND People with low back pain (LBP) alter their motion patterns during level walking and stair climbing due to pain or fear. However, the alternations of load sharing during the two activities are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LBP caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on the muscle activities of 17 main trunk muscle groups and the intradiscal forces acting on the five lumbar discs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-six healthy adults and seven LDH patients were recruited to perform level walking and stair climbing in the Gait Analysis Laboratory. Eight optical markers were placed on the bony landmarks of the spinous process and pelvis, and the coordinates of these markers were captured during the two activities using motion capture system. The coordinates of the captured markers were applied to developed musculoskeletal model to calculate the kinetic variables. RESULTS LDH patients demonstrated higher muscle activities in most trunk muscle groups during both level walking and stair climbing. There were decreases in anteroposterior shear forces on the discs in the pathological region and increases in the compressive forces on all the lumbar discs during level walking. The symmetry of mediolateral shear forces was worse in LDH patients than healthy adults during stair climbing. CONCLUSIONS LDH patients exhibited different kinetic alternations during level walking and stair climbing. However, both adaptive strategies added extra burdens to the trunk system and further increased the risk for development of LDH.

Trunk muscle activity patterns and motion patterns of patients with motor complete spinal cord injury at T8 and T10 walking with different un-powered exoskeletons.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore how neurological injured levels of spinal cord affect the performance of patients walking with different un-powered exoskeletons. STUDY DESIGN: Case series observational study. SETTING: Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory at the National Research Center Rehabilitation Technical Aids. METHODS: Electromyography and motion data from two subjects with complete spinal cord injury at T10 and T8 walking with un-powered exoskeletons were collected simultaneously. OUTCOME MEASURES: Surface electromyography of trunk muscles and motion data including joint angle and center of mass (COM). RESULTS: Compared to T10 subject, T8 subject activated trunk muscles in higher levels walking with all tested un-powered exoskeletons and had greater pelvic obliquity walking with reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) and energy-stored exoskeleton (ES-EXO). ES-EXO can redistribute muscle forces, recruit trunk muscles evenly, increase walking speed and improve COM trajectory in frontal plane. CONCLUSION: This study revealed differences in kinematics and muscle activities in walking with three un-powered exoskeletons between two patients with different neurological injured levels. ES-EXO had advantages over conventional un-powered exoskeletons on recruiting muscles evenly and improving walking speed, step length and COM trajectory.

Influences of lumbar disc herniation on the kinematics in multi-segmental spine, pelvis, and lower extremities during five activities of daily living.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem that can contribute to motor dysfunction. Previous studies reporting the changes in kinematic characteristics caused by LBP present conflicting results. This study aimed to apply the multisegmental spinal model to investigate the kinematic changes in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during five activities of daily living (ADLs). METHODS: Twenty-six healthy subjects and 7 LDH patients participated in this study and performed level walking, stair climbing, trunk flexion, and ipsilateral and contralateral pickups. The angular displacement of the thorax, upper lumbar (ULx), lower lumbar (LLx), pelvis, hip, and knee was calculated using a modified full-gait-model in the AnyBody modeling system. RESULTS: In the patient group, the ULx almost showed no sagittal angular displacement while the LLx remained part of the sagittal angular displacement during trunk flexion and the two pickups. In the two pickups, pelvic tilt and lower extremities' flexion increased to compensate for the deficiency in lumbar motion. LDH patients exhibited significantly less pelvic rotation during stair climbing and greater pelvic rotation in other ADLs, except in contralateral pickup. In addition, LDH patients demonstrated more antiphase movement in the transverse plane between ULx and LLx, during level walking and stair climbing, between thorax and pelvis in the two pickups. CONCLUSIONS: LDH patients mainly restrict the motion of LLx and ULx in the spinal region during the five ADLs. Pelvic rotation is an important method to compensate for the limited lumbar motion. Furthermore, pelvic tilt and lower extremities' flexion increased when ADLs were quite difficult for LDH patients.