Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination using HEPLISAV™ in selected adult populations compared to Engerix-B® vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: HEPLISAV™ is an adult hepatitis B vaccine that requires fewer doses over a shorter period of time and elicits higher and earlier seroprotection compared to Engerix-B to reduce the risk of hepatitis B infection. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with HEPLISAV vs. Engerix-B(®) to prevent hepatitis B infection in select populations. METHODS: Markov models were developed for the following populations: diabetics, patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease, healthcare workers and international travelers to countries with high HBV infection prevalence. Hepatitis B disease progression was modeled using 11 health states: seroprotected, susceptible, acute infection, chronic infection, fulminant hepatic failure, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, post-transplant care, and death. Seroprotection rates were obtained from two phase 3 clinical trials comparing HEPLISAV with Engerix-B and ranged across various populations from 89-96% for HEPLISAV and 62-81% for Engerix-B. Higher vaccination completion rates were assumed for HEPLISAV compared with Engerix-B given that fewer doses of HEPLISAV are required in a shorter period of time to achieve seroprotection for the evaluated populations. Each cycle length after the first year in the model was 1-year. All future costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. A lifetime analysis and a U.S. payer perspective were used. RESULTS: HEPLISAV has a favorable cost-effectiveness profile with incremental cost effectiveness ratios <$25,000 across all populations studied. In the patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease, HEPLISAV was the dominant option and was cost-saving compared with Engerix-B. The cost of vaccine, regimen completion rates, and seroprotection rates were the sensitive variables in the models. CONCLUSIONS: HEPLISAV is a cost-effective option to provide high rates of seroprotection and early seroprotection across a range of populations from health care workers to patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease.

Budget impact modeling for a single-tablet formulation of ibuprofen and famotidine for prevention of upper gastrointestinal ulcers in patients with osteoarthritis and/or rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the relief of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and to decrease the risk of developing upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulcers in patients taking ibuprofen for those indications. Currently, little is known about the cost impact of gastroprotective therapies, and an estimate of the financial consequences of adopting these therapies will be helpful to decision makers. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to review a model that evaluates the expected financial impact to US health care plans from the introduction of single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine into the chronic NSAID user population. METHODS: A budget impact model, considering a typical health plan of 1 million enrollees, was used to compare patients receiving: (1) single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine; (2) chronic NSAID treatment plus any GI-protective agent; and (3) chronic NSAID treatment without a GI-protective agent. RESULTS: The expected medication cost for single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine was $734,192 ($81,577 in year 1, $244,731 in year 2, and $407,884 in year 3), corresponding to a total per-member per-month cost of $0.020 ($0.007 in year 1, $0.020 in year 2, and $0.034 in year 3). Considering anticipated decreases in the use of other NSAIDs, the use of GI-protective agents, and GI complications, the total expected 3-year drug cost for single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine was offset by 50%, representing an estimated total budget impact of $364,396 or $0.010 per member per month. Sensitivity analyses of cost and market share variables and clinical and drug characteristics identified the most influential variables to be the cost of the drug and persistence to the ibuprofen/famotidine formulation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The expected decrease in treatment costs for less serious GI-related complications illustrates the benefits of single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine as a gastroprotective therapy in patients receiving chronic NSAID treatment, with a modest financial impact on total health care costs.