Lumbar drainage for the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension in HIV-negative cryptococcal meningitis.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate lumbar drainage (LD) for controlling refractory intracranial hypertension among non-HIV cryptococcal meningitis patients. Patients & methods: A case-control study was designed to compare LD (case) with repeated lumbar puncture (control). Results: Both LD and repeated lumbar puncture can efficiently control refractory intracranial hypertension. LD group showed better clinical symptom remission, such as lower rate of headache, vision disorders, signs of meningeal irritation and conscious disturbance, than control group. LD group was reported with higher intracranial pressure reduction (173.75 ± 17.72 mmH2O) than those among control group (113.50 ± 14.94 mmH2O; p < 0.05). Conclusion: LD is an effective and safe alternative to control refractory intracranial hypertension in HIV-negative cryptococcal meningitis patients.

Triple therapy versus amphotericin B plus flucytosine for the treatment of non-HIV- and non-transplant-associated cryptococcal meningitis: retrospective cohort study.

Objectives Amphotericin B plus flucytosine is the most widely used induction therapy regimen for non-HIV-infected and non-transplant patients; however, the therapeutic outcomes are unsatisfactory, especially when two antifungal drugs are at sub-therapeutic doses. Methods In this study of induction therapy, all non-HIV-infected, non-transplant patients with a first episode of cryptococcal meningitis were divided into two groups. In group I, the patients received amphotericin B plus 5-flucytosine. In group II, in addition to amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine, the patients also received fluconazole. Results In this study, 32 patients were included in group I, and the other 30 were in group II. Although patients from group II had higher fungal burdens with approximately 2100 Cryptococci/ml CSF before treatment, they had a significantly higher frequency of satisfactory outcomes (80% vs. 50%, respectively, P = 0.014). Less time for more patients in group II to have CSF sterilization (P = 0.021; P = 0.046). And more patients in group II had improved neurological function circumstances evaluated by comparing the BMRC staging between patients at discharge and follow-up 10 weeks (P = 0.032). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Triple therapy a superior alternative induction regimen for patients with non-HIV- and non-transplant-associated cryptococcal meningitis.