Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor shortens duration of critical neutropenia and prolongs disease-free survival after sequential high-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) salvage therapy for refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. German AML Cooperative Group.

Patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who undergo intensive salvage chemotherapy carry a high risk of treatment failure due to infectious complications and early relapses. The study presented here assessed the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the duration of post-treatment neutropenia, the incidence of infection-related deaths, and the disease-free and overall survival. Sixty-eight evaluable patients with relapsed and refractory AML received G-CSF 5 microg/kg per day subcutaneously starting 2 days after the completion of salvage treatment with the S-HAM regimen, consisting of high-dose cytosine arabinoside twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and mitoxantrone on days 3, 4, 10, and 11. Ninety-one patients who were treated with the identical S-HAM regimen but without G-CSF support during a preceding study served as controls. The application of G-CSF resulted in a significant shortening of critical neutropenia of less than 500 microl (36 vs. 40 days; p = 0.008), which translated into a trend towards a lower early death rate (21% vs. 30%) and an increase of complete remissions (56% vs. 47%, p=0.11). In patients younger than 60 years a significant prolongation of time to treatment failure (159 vs. 93 days, p=0.038) and of duration of disease-free survival (203 vs. 97 days, p=0.003) was observed. These results indicate a beneficial effect of G-CSF on early mortality as well as on long-term outcome when administered after S-HAM salvage therapy for advanced AML.

Failure of fluconazole prophylaxis to reduce mortality or the requirement of systemic amphotericin B therapy during treatment for refractory acute myeloid leukemia: results of a prospective randomized phase III study. German AML Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections have increasingly become a matter of concern with regard to patients receiving intensive myelosuppressive therapy for hematologic malignancies. Such infections, especially prolonged neutropenia systemic fungal infections, may contribute substantially to infectious complications and early death. Measures for early detection and effective prophylactic strategies using active and nontoxic antifungal agents are therefore urgently needed. METHODS: The current randomized study was initiated to assess the efficacy of oral fluconazole as systemic antifungal prophylaxis for high risk patients with recurrent acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive salvage therapy. RESULTS: Of 68 fully evaluable patients, 36 were randomized to fluconazole in addition to standard prophylaxis with oral co-trimoxazol, colistin sulphate, and amphotericin B suspension, and 32 were randomized to standard prophylaxis only. No major differences between the two groups were observed in the number of episodes of fever of unknown origin (61% vs. 50%) or clinically defined infections (56% vs. 50%). Microbiologically defined infections were more frequent in the fluconazole group (50% vs. 31%), mainly due to a higher incidence of bacteremias (42% vs. 22%). There were two cases of proven invasive fungal infections in each group. Systemic amphotericin B was administered more frequently to patients receiving fluconazole prophylaxis (56% vs. 28%). Fluconazole prophylaxis had no impact on the rate of early death or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with high risk recurrent acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive salvage therapy, antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole was not superior to standard prophylaxis only.