Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Phys ; 31(7): 2068-74, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15305459

ABSTRACT

A new characterization of depth-ionization parameters for electron beams is empirically deduced from our data analysis based on the divided difference method (the DD method), which employs the numerical differential of an ionization curve. The important feature of the present method is that it does not necessarily require normalized percent depth-ionization (NPDI) data. The depth of 50% of maximum ionization, I50, which is an important parameter for electron beam dosimetry, can be deduced from the analysis of an unnormalized (or partial) depth-ionization (UDI) curve obtained over a short interval of depth. The values of I50 determined by the DD method are in agreement to within 0.1 mm for energies of 4, 6, and 9 MeV, compared with the ones determined by the TG-51 protocol method (or the conventional method), and the difference was 0.9 mm for 12 and 15 MeV. The dose at the reference depth, dref, calculated from I50 by the DD method, is found to be in agreement with TG-51 to within 0.1%. The field size dependence of the DD method using UDI data was studied for three field sizes: 6 x 6, 10 x 10, and 20 x 20 cm2. For all energies, the discrepancies of I50 as determined by both methods were 0.9 mm on average for the 6 x 6 cm2 fields and 0.6 mm for the other two field sizes. This dependence was remarkable for 6 x 6 cm2 fields for 12 and 15 MeV, and the discrepancies shown by the DD method were 1.2 mm for 12 MeV and 1.8 mm for 15 MeV, respectively. Since the reference field size in clinical dosimetry is usually 10 x 10 cm2, this dependence will not affect clinical dosimetry. The DD method could be an alternative option for checking beam quality in dose calibration.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Electrons/therapeutic use , Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Calibration/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiometry/standards , Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Med Phys ; 30(8): 1976-81, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12945963

ABSTRACT

A radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass rod dosimeter (GRD) and a small active volume p-type silicon diode detector are used for the measurement of the output factors from Gamma-Knife fields. The GRD system consists of small rod-shaped glass chip detectors and an automatic readout device. The output factors measured with the GRD from the 14, 8 and 4 mm helmets relative to the 18 mm helmet are 0.981, 0.942 and 0.877, respectively. Similarly, the corresponding output factors measured with the p-type silicon diode detector are 0.980, 0.949 and 0.867, respectively. The output factors are corrected for the end effect for each helmet. The output factors obtained from both detectors are in good agreement with the values in a recent publication and the values recommended by Elekta, the manufacturer. The directional dependence of these detectors is also measured. For the Gamma-Knife angle ranging from 6 to 36 degrees in the y-z plane of the stereotactic space, the measured angular dependence of the GRD is approximately 1.0% at a 4 MV x-ray beam. The response of the silicon diode detector indicates approximately 3-4% directional dependence for the same angular range for a 6 MV x-ray beam. The Gamma-Knife helmet output factors measured with the silicon diode detector are corrected for angular dependence.


Subject(s)
Glass , Radiometry/methods , Radiosurgery/methods , Film Dosimetry , Light , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Silicon/chemistry , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
3.
Med Phys ; 29(11): 2497-505, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12462714

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to present the dosimetry and mechanical accuracy of the first rotating gamma system (RGS) installed in North America for stereotactic radiosurgery. The data were obtained during the installation, acceptance test procedure, and commissioning of the unit. The RGS unit installed at UC Davis Cancer Center (RGSu) has modifications on the source and collimator bodies from the earlier version of the Chinese RGS (RGSc). The differences between these two RGSs are presented. The absolute dose at the focal point was measured in a 16-cm-diam acrylic phantom using a small volume chamber, which was calibrated at the University of Wisconsin Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Laboratory (UW-ADCL). The dose in acrylic was then converted to a dose in water. A collimator output factor from each of the four different collimator sizes ranging from 4, 8, 14, and 18 mm was measured with (1) a smaller volume chamber and (2) approximately 3.0 mm x 3.0 mm x 1.0 mm TLD chips in the same acrylic phantom. The Gafchromic films were used for the dose profile, collimator output factor, and mechanical/radiation field isocentricity measurements. The TLD chips were processed in-house whereas Gafchromic films were processed both at the UW-ADCL and in-house. The timer error, timer accuracy, and timer linearity were also determined. The dose profiles were found to be similar between RGSc and RGSu. The 4 mm collimator output factor of the RGSu was approximately 0.6, similar to that from RGSc, in comparison to 0.8 in the report for a Leksell Model U Gamma-Knife. The mechanical/radiation field isocentricity for RGSc and RGSu is found to be similar and is within 0.3 mm in both X and Y directions. In the Z direction, the beam center of the RGSu is shifted toward the sources by 0.75 mm from the mechanical isocenter whereas no data are available for RGSc. Little dosimetric difference is found between RGSu and RGSc. It is reported that RGSc has the same dosimetric and mechanical characteristics as the Model U Gamma-Knife. Therefore, RGSu should be capable of achieving stereotactic radiosurgery with the same degree of dosimetric and mechanical accuracy as with the Gamma-Knife.


Subject(s)
Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , California , Film Dosimetry , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL