Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(10): e14499, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine the frequency of breastfeeding of mothers working in primary care, the differences between different employment groups, and the effective factors. METHODS: This descriptive research study was conducted with a self-report online survey design. The snowball sampling method was used for the sample selection, and 151 family physicians and 126 family health professionals were included in the study during the research period (June 2019-December 2019). A 35-item survey was used to collect data. The response rate was 44.9% (49.5% family physicians/40.3% family health professionals). RESULTS: The mean duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 3.9 ± 2.0 months, and the mean duration of total breastfeeding was 16.7 ± 8.5 months. There was no significant difference between the family physicians and family health professionals in terms of exclusive breastfeeding (P = .580) and total breastfeeding (P = .325) durations. The most common reasons for weaning were reduced milk supply (25.6%) and not being able to use breastfeeding leave (23.1%) due to problems at work. Of the sample, 41.3% had problems with their coworkers and 41.9% had problems related to patient care when taking breastfeeding leave. Working in a baby-friendly centre (P = .01), prolonged exclusive breastfeeding (P < .001), and increased hours of breastfeeding leave taken (P = .001) had a positive effect on breastfeeding for ≥24 months while experiencing problems with coworkers in taking breastfeeding leave (P = .023) had a negative effect on this variable. CONCLUSIONS: All of the factors that were determined to affect the continuation of breastfeeding for ≥24 months are modifiable. It is very important for relevant authorities to undertake necessary action to improve the conditions of working mothers based on these results. Health professional that can maintain the balance between family and work will work more efficiently.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Physicians , Female , Humans , Mothers , Primary Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Turk Patoloji Derg ; 36(3): 256-260, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525213

ABSTRACT

Sirenomelia, which is also known as mermaid syndrome and characterized by the fusion of the lower extremities, is the most severe form of caudal regression syndrome and one of the rare and lethal congenital malformations. The anomalies that might be seen in this syndrome include pelvic-sacral dysplasia, genital anomalies, bilateral pelvic renal fusion accompanied by renal dysplasia, colon atresia, unilateral umbilical artery, and imperforated anus. The incidence of sirenomelia is 0.8-1 cases in 60,000-100,000 deliveries and the male/female ratio is 2.7-3:1. The case reported in the present study was a 13-week-old male fetus 30 g in weight with a macerated appearance. The upper extremities had a relatively normal appearance but the lower extremities were conjoined and there was a single lower extremity consisting of conjoined feet and toes. In the face, the nasal bridge was sunken, the ears had a low position, and there were cleft palate and cleft lip. Examination of the external genital organs revealed that the penile part was in the anal region. There was no anus opening. The crown-rump length was 8.5cm, the heel-toe length was approx. 1cm, and the rump-heel length was approx. 3.7cm. There were none of the two kidneys, ureter, bladder, urethra, or rectum. In the umbilical cord, there were 2 venous structures, one of which was the artery. Perivillous congestion and hyperemia, perivillous calcification, deciduitis, and focal infarct regions were observed in placental tissues. This report aims to discuss this very rare case together with the literature.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/pathology , Ectromelia/pathology , Female , Fetus , Humans , Male , Pregnancy
3.
J Pediatr ; 154(3): 385-90, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18849052

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate interventions that affect pain reduction during vaccination in infants and children attending a well-child unit. STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive sample of 243 children between age 0 and 48 months receiving their routine vaccinations was randomly assigned to 1 of the study groups. A total of 158 infants under age 6 months were randomly assigned to breast-feeding or no breast-feeding during immunization, and 85 children age 6 to 48 months were randomly assigned to receive 12% sucrose solution, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, or no intervention. All children were evaluated for crying time and pain score by a pediatrician using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) for those under age 12 months and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) for those over age 12 months. RESULTS: Breast-feeding in infants under age 6 months and use of sucrose or lidocaine-prilocaine in children age 6 to 48 months significantly reduced crying time and pain scores compared with controls. No difference in outcome was seen between the sucrose and lidocaine-prilocaine treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Here we expand on previous findings by demonstrating that breast-feeding may have an analgesic effect up to age 6 months and that in older children, both sucrose and lidocaine-prilocaine reduce vaccination pain.


Subject(s)
Pain Management , Pain/etiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Breast Feeding , Child, Preschool , Crying , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement , Prilocaine/administration & dosage , Sucrose/administration & dosage , Sweetening Agents/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL