Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 15: 3069-3078, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to reveal sex differences in depression comprehension by reanalyzing data from a previous study of patients who were administered antidepressants. METHODS: A total of 424 outpatients were enrolled in the study. Participants were provided an original self-administered questionnaire that comprised eight items: depressive symptoms, course of depression, cause of depression, treatment plan, duration of antidepressant use, how to discontinue antidepressants, side effects of antidepressants, and psychotherapy. Each item consisted of the following two questions: "Have you received an explanation from the doctor in charge?" and "How much do you understand about your treatment?" The level of patients' comprehension of these questions was rated on a scale of 0-10 (11 anchor points). Symptoms were evaluated using the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Japanese version, and other scales. Patients were divided on the basis of sex, regardless of whether they were in remission. RESULTS: Compared with male patients, female patients with depression exhibited lower levels of depression and did not receive adequate psychoeducation from their physicians. While depression comprehension of female patients might not necessarily be associated with remission, male patients in remission received more explanations about depression and understood more compared with female patients. CONCLUSION: Depression comprehension of male patients might be associated with remission, and psychoeducation should be sex-oriented to improve treatment responses.

2.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 15: 205-211, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666117

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are regarded as an important alternative to oral medication for patients with schizophrenia. However, LAIs remain under-utilized in clinical practice. AIMS: The aims of this investigation were to 1) obtain information on patients' attitudes toward LAIs and 2) assess factors associated with patients' acceptance of LAIs, and 3) identify predictors of the discrepancy between patients and referring psychiatrists' opinions regarding the appropriateness for LAIs. METHODS: Anonymized data were collected from a questionnaire distributed to 159 patients with schizophrenia and their referring psychiatrists at three psychiatric hospitals between February 2014 and July 2014. The patients completed an original questionnaire developed to evaluate their attitudes regarding LAIs. Regarding the appropriateness of LAI prescription, patients and their referring psychiatrists were asked to rate, on a 5-point scale, how appropriate they felt the depot prescription was for the patients. The participants also answered instruments to assess symptom severity, antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms, functions, quality of life, and self-esteem levels. RESULTS: Patients currently on LAIs have favorable attitudes toward LAIs with respect to side effects, relapse prevention, efficacy, pain, and cost. Expectation of relapse prevention was significantly associated with patients' acceptance of LAIs (answering that those drugs are appropriate for their own treatment). In addition, the discrepancy between the patients' and referring psychiatrists' opinions regarding the appropriateness of LAI treatment was significantly associated with symptom severity, expectation of relapse prevention, belief that LAIs are painful, and belief that LAIs offer a reduced range of antipsychotic choices. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward LAIs need to be considered when deciding whether to prescribe this formulation. Access to information on LAIs, including their benefit in relapse prevention, might enhance the acceptance and use of this formulation among patients with schizophrenia.

3.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 14: 1319-1327, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29872299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To reveal characteristics of understanding of depression among older patients, we reanalyzed the data from a previous study of patients who were administered antidepressants. METHODS: A total of 424 outpatients were enrolled in this study. We used an original self-administered questionnaire consisting of eight items: depressive symptoms, the course of depression, the cause of depression, the treatment plan, the duration of antidepressant use, how to discontinue antidepressants, the side effects of antidepressants, and psychotherapy. Each item consisted of the following two questions: "Have you received an explanation from the doctor in charge?" and "How much do you understand about your treatment?". The level of understanding was rated on a scale of 0-10 (11 anchor points). Subjects were divided into two groups: younger patients who were <65 years of age and older patients who were ≥65 years of age. RESULTS: Older patients with depression showed lower levels of understanding of depression and did not receive sufficient psychoeducation from their physicians, but their understanding of depression might not be associated with their remission. In the younger group, the scores of understanding of the course of depression, the treatment plan, how to discontinue antidepressants, and psychotherapy items, and the total understanding score of remitters, were significantly higher than those of non-remitters. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the items score or total score between remitters and non-remitters in the older group. CONCLUSION: Older patients showed lower levels of understanding of depression and did not appear to receive sufficient psychoeducation, but their understanding of depression might not be associated with their remission.

4.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 14: 505-510, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29483775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We analyzed data on the understanding of depression among patients who were prescribed antidepressants to determine when psychoeducation should be provided. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 424 outpatients were enrolled in this study. We used an original self-administered questionnaire consisting of eight categories: (A) depressive symptoms, (B) the course of depression, (C) causes of depression, (D) the treatment plan, (E) the duration of antidepressant use, (F) discontinuation of antidepressants, (G) the side effects of antidepressants, and (H) psychotherapy. Each category was assessed with the following two questions: "Have you received an explanation of this topic from the doctor in charge?" and "How much do you understand about your treatment?" The level of understanding of patients was rated on a scale from 0 to 10 (no understanding to full understanding; 11 anchor points). Symptoms were evaluated using the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Japanese version (QIDS-J) and other scales. Participants were divided into two groups: patients receiving psychoeducation at their first visit vs patients receiving psychoeducation after their first visit. RESULTS: Of the patients who had received an explanation of each psychoeducation item, a greater proportion were in the first visit group than in the after first visit group for nearly all items. Compared with the after first visit group, the first visit group showed a better understanding of each psychoeducation item and significantly lower QIDS scores for those receiving explanations of Items A and C. There was no significant difference between the two groups in remittance rates. CONCLUSION: Psychoeducation on depression, especially regarding the symptoms and causes of depression, should be provided at patients' first visit.

5.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 41(1): 1-5, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29300204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated the association between the severity and knowledge of depression and attempted to reveal the specific aspects of understanding associated with severity. METHODS: A total of 424 outpatients were enrolled in this study. We used an original self-administered questionnaire: (a) the symptoms of depression, (b) the course of depression, (c) the cause of depression, (d) the treatment plan, (e) the duration of antidepressant use, (f) how to discontinue antidepressant use, (g) the adverse effects of antidepressants, and (h) psychotherapy. Each category consisted of the following questions: "How much do you understand about your treatment?" The level of understanding was rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10. The following scales were administered: the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Japanese version (QIDS-J); the Global Assessment of Functioning; and the Clinical Global Impression, Severity scale. Subjects were divided in 5 groups according to severity of QIDS-J. Clinical characteristics were also investigated. RESULTS: Based on an analysis of variance, significant differences were found among the 5 groups with regard to age at onset, duration of disease, and duration of antidepressant use. A multiple regression analysis revealed that item B significantly and negatively predicted the QIDS-J scores, whereas item C significantly and positively predicted these scores. Some multiple logistic regression models seeking to distinguish severity found that all but items E to H were significantly associated with severity. CONCLUSIONS: Items B and C were significantly negatively and positively associated with depression severity, respectively. Sufficient and suitable psychoeducation in and knowledge of depression might improve the treatment responses in patients with depression.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Outpatients , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Depression/psychology , Depression/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Psychotherapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Affect Disord ; 225: 313-316, 2018 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28843082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled clinical trials are the standard in the design of clinical studies for the licensing of new drugs. Medical and ethical concerns regarding placebo use still exist in clinical trials of depressed patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes toward placebo-controlled clinical trials and to assess factors related to the willingness to participate in such trials among depressed patients in Japan. METHODS: A total of 206 depressed patients aged 49.5 ± 15.7 years (mean ± SD) who were admitted to three psychiatric hospitals were recruited for a cross-sectional study from June 2015 to March 2016. After a thorough explanation of the placebo, the study participants completed a brief 14-item questionnaire developed to evaluate patients' attitudes regarding possible participation in placebo-controlled clinical trials. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology was also administered to assess depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The results indicated that 47% of the patients would be willing to participate in a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Expectations for the improvement of disease, desire to receive more medical care, encouragement by family or friends, and desire to support the development of new drugs were associated with the willingness to participate in such trials, whereas a belief that additional time would be required for medical examinations and fear of exacerbation of symptoms due to placebo use were associated with non-participation. LIMITATIONS: Patients were asked about possible participation in placebo-controlled clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the respondents were willing to participate in placebo-controlled clinical trials. Attitudes toward participation in a placebo-controlled clinical trial need to be considered when deciding whether to conduct such a trial.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Patient Participation/psychology , Placebos , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
PLoS One ; 10(11): e0143356, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26600382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the use of placebo in clinical trials of schizophrenia patients is controversial because of medical and ethical concerns, placebo-controlled clinical trials are commonly used in the licensing of new drugs. AIMS: The objective of this study was to assess the attitudes toward placebo-controlled clinical trials among patients with schizophrenia in Japan. METHOD: Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited patients (n = 251) aged 47.7±13.2 (mean±SD) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were admitted to six psychiatric hospitals from December 2013 to March 2014. We employed a 14-item questionnaire specifically developed to survey patients' attitudes toward placebo-controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: The results indicated that 33% of the patients would be willing to participate in a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Expectations for improvement of disease, a guarantee of hospital treatment continuation, and encouragement by family or friends were associated with the willingness to participate in such trials, whereas a belief of additional time required for medical examinations was associated with non-participation. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of the respondents stated that they would be willing to participate in placebo-controlled clinical trials. Therefore, interpreting the results from placebo-controlled clinical trials could be negatively affected by selection bias.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors
8.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 11: 2811-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26604765

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We used self-administered questionnaires to investigate the level of understanding of depression among outpatients who were administered antidepressants. METHODS: A total of 424 outpatients were enrolled in this study. We used an original self-administered questionnaire that consisted of eight categories: (A) depressive symptoms, (B) the course of depression, (C) the cause of depression, (D) the treatment plan, (E) the duration of taking antidepressants, (F) how to discontinue antidepressants, (G) the side effects of the antidepressants, and (H) psychotherapy. Each category consisted of the following two questions: "Have you received an explanation from the doctor in charge?" and "How much do you understand about it?" The level of understanding was rated on a scale of 0-10 (11 anchor points). The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Japanese version, Global Assessment of Functioning, and Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale were administered, and clinical characteristics were investigated. RESULTS: The percentages of participants who received explanations were as follows: 61.8% for (A), 49.2% for (B), 50.8% for (C), 57.2% for (D), 46.3% for (E), 28.5% for (F), 50.6% for (G), and 36.1% for (H). The level of understanding in participants who received explanations from their physicians was significantly higher compared with patients who did not receive explanations for all evaluated categories. Patient age, age at disease onset, and Global Assessment of Functioning scores were significantly associated with more items compared with the other variables. CONCLUSION: Psychoeducation is not sufficiently performed. According to the study results, it is possible for patients to receive better psychoeducation and improve their clinical outcomes.

9.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 11: 477-84, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25750528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The strong association between psychiatric patients who receive antipsychotics and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is known. Although previous reports suggest that hyperprolactinemia often increases markers of activated coagulation, few studies have examined the direct relationship between the prolactin level elevated by antipsychotics and activated markers of activated coagulation. METHOD: The participants included 182 patients with schizophrenia (male =89, female =93) who received antipsychotic treatments for at least 3 months. Markers of VTE (D-dimer, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and thrombin-antithrombin complex) and serum prolactin concentrations were measured. RESULTS: Prolactin levels were significantly correlated with the logarithmic transformation of the D-dimer (r=0.320, P=0.002) and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product levels (r=0.236, P=0.026) but not of the thrombin-antithrombin complex level (r=0.117, ns) among men. However, no correlations were found between the VTE markers and prolactin levels among women. These results were confirmed using multiple regression analyses that included demographic factors and antipsychotic dosages. CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that hyperprolactinemia is associated with an increase in markers of activated coagulation among men receiving antipsychotics. This finding clinically implies that monitoring and modulating prolactin levels among men are important to decrease the risk of VTE.

10.
BMC Psychiatry ; 13: 108, 2013 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23570345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is becoming more prevalent and thus growing as a public health concern in patients with schizophrenia. This investigation evaluated the relationship between body weight and the self-reported quality of life (QOL) of Japanese patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We recruited outpatients (n=225) aged 42.5 ± 12.8 (mean ± SD) years with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia who were admitted to psychiatric hospitals. This study used a cross-sectional design. The assessments included an interview to obtain sociodemographic data, the second version of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2), the 10-item version of the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and height and weight measurements. SF-36v2 subscores were examined for differences based on the following body mass index (BMI) categories: healthy weight (BMI < 24.9), overweight (BMI 25-29.9) and obese (BMI > 30). A multiple regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between these BMI categories and QOL outcomes. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of obesity in our sample was 16.4%. A multiple regression model revealed that age, gender, DAI-10 scores, CGI-S scores, social functioning, role emotional functioning, mental health, and Mental Composite Summary (MCS) score were significantly and positively associated with overweight status. Physical functioning, general health, role emotional functioning, mental health, and a physical composite summary (PCS) score were significantly and negatively associated with obesity. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of obesity is both a physical and a mental problem. An obesity intervention program for patients with schizophrenia may improve health-related QOL in patients with schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Outpatients/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Japan , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Obesity/psychology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...