Time-dependent changes of magnetic resonance imaging-visible mesh implants in patients.

OBJECTIVES: Shrinkage and deformation of mesh implants used for hernia treatment can be the cause of long-term complications. The purpose of this study was to quantify noninvasively time-dependent mesh shrinkage, migration, and configuration changes in patients who were surgically treated for inguinal hernia using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible mesh implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an agarose phantom, meshes in different shrinkage and folding conditions were used to validate the quantification process. Seven patients who were surgically (3 bilaterally) treated for inguinal hernia using iron-loaded mesh implants were prospectively examined using MRI. Gradient echo sequences in sagittal and transverse orientations were performed on day 1 after surgery and at day 90. The mesh-induced signal voids were semiautomatically segmented and a polygonal surface model was generated. A comparison of area and centroid position was performed between the 2 calculated surfaces (day 1 vs day 90). RESULTS: The phantom study revealed a maximum deviation of 3.6% between the MRI-based quantification and the actual mesh size. All 10 implants were successfully reconstructed. The mean (SD) observed mesh shrinkage 90 days after surgery was 20.9% (7.1%). The mean (SD) centroid movement was 1.17 (0.47) cm. Topographic analysis revealed mean (SD) local configuration changes of 0.23 (0.03) cm. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, significant mesh shrinkage (20.9%) but marginal changes in local mesh configuration occurred within 90 days after mesh implantation. Centroid shift of the mesh implant can be traced back to different patient positioning and abdominal distension. The developed algorithm facilitates noninvasive assessment of key figures regarding MRI-visible meshes. Consequently, it might help to improve mesh technology as well as surgical skills.

First in vivo visualization of MRI-visible IPOM in a rabbit model.

BACKGROUND: Application of a mesh in presence of pneumoperitoneum may cause deformation or wave formation when gas is released. Moreover, mesh shrinkage during subsequent wound healing cannot be detected in vivo without invasive diagnostics. Using MRI-visible polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh, the extend of mesh deformation and shrinkage could be objectified by MRI for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) implantation was performed in 10 female rabbits using ferro-oxide loaded PVDF meshes. MRI measurements were performed postoperatively at days 1 and 90. After three-dimensional reconstruction of all MRI images the total surface and the effective surface of the implanted mesh were explored and calculated computer-assisted. RESULTS: In all cases, the mesh could be identified in MRI. The subsequent three-dimensional reconstruction always allowed a calculation of the mesh area. In relation to the original size of the used textile implant, we found neither a significant reduction of the effective mesh surface after release of the pneumoperitoneum at day 1 after laparoscopic surgery nor a significant change of the total surface of this large pore mesh by the end of the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo investigation of mesh surface via MRI could exclude a significant initial reduction of the effective mesh surface after release of pneumoperitoneum, in this IPOM rabbit model. A further subsequent shrinkage of these large pore PVDF meshes could be excluded, as well. Imaging of MRI-visible IPOM mesh turned out to be a sufficient tool to objectify mesh configuration and position in vivo.

First in-human magnetic resonance visualization of surgical mesh implants for inguinal hernia treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Until today, there have been no conventional imaging methods available to visualize surgical mesh implants and related complications. In a new approach, we incorporated iron particles into polymer-based implants and visualized them by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).After clinical approval of such implants, the purposes of this study were to evaluate the MRI conspicuity of such iron-loaded mesh implants in patients treated for inguinal hernias and to assess the immediate postsurgical mesh configuration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approved by the ethics committee, in this prospective cohort study, 13 patients (3 patients with bilateral hernia treatment) were surgically treated for inguinal hernia receiving iron-loaded mesh implants between March and October 2012. The implants were applied via laparoscopic technique (transabdominal preperitoneal technique; n = 8, 3 patients with bilateral hernia treatment) or via open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein surgery; n = 5). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 day after the surgery at a 1.5-T scanner (Achieva; Philips, Best, The Netherlands) with a 16-channel receiver coil using 3 different gradient echo sequences (first gradient echo sequence, second gradient echo sequence, and third gradient echo sequence [GRE1-3]) and 1 T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence (T2wTSE). Three radiologists independently evaluated mesh conspicuity and diagnostic value with respect to different structures using a semiquantitative scoring system (1, insufficient; 2, sufficient; 3, good; 4, optimal). Mesh deformation and coverage of the hernia were visually assessed and rated using a 5-point semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed models and linear contrast. RESULTS: All 16 implants were successfully visualized by MRI. On gradient echo sequences, the mesh is clearly delineated as a thick hypointense line. On T2wTSE, the mesh was depicted as a faint hypointense line, which was difficult to identify. The first gradient echo sequence was rated best for visual conspicuity (mean [SD], 3.8 [0.4]). T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was preferred for evaluation of the surrounding anatomy (mean [SD], 3.7 [0.3]). For the combined assessment of both mesh and anatomy, GRE3 was rated best (mean [SD], 2.9 [0.7]). Local air slightly reduced mesh delineation (lowest mean [SD] rating, 2.9 [0.7] for GRE3). Overall, in both implantation techniques, the meshes exhibited mild to moderate deformations (mean [SD], 3.3 [0.4], 3.1 [0.3], and 2.8 [0.3] on average with open technique, 2.7 [0.3], 2.7 [0.2], and 2.3 [0.3] with laparoscopic technique). Coverage of the hernia was achieved in 15 of the 16 implants. CONCLUSIONS: Combining iron-loaded implants and MRI, we achieved mesh visualization for the first time in patients. For MRI protocol, we propose a combination of different gradient echo sequences and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences: first gradient echo sequence for mesh configuration, T2wTSE for anatomy assessment, and GRE3 for evaluation of hernia coverage and mesh localization. Using our approach, MRI could become a noninvasive alternative to open surgical exploration if mesh-related complications were suspected.

In vivo visualization of polymer-based mesh implants using conventional magnetic resonance imaging and positive-contrast susceptibility imaging.

PURPOSE: Polymer-based textile meshes for abdominal hernia treatment are invisible by conventional imaging methods, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Integration of iron particles in the mesh base material allows MRI visualization of meshes. Positive-contrast susceptibility imaging (PCSI) was implemented to separate susceptibility-induced voids from proton-deficient voids. The purpose of this study was to compare PCSI with conventional gradient echo and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences for the in vivo assessment of superparamagnetic iron oxide particle-loaded surgical meshes in an animal model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Iron-loaded polymer meshes were implanted into the abdominal wall of 10 rabbits. At days 1, 30, and 90 after surgery, conventional gradient echo, TSE, and PCSI were performed at 1.5 T in the sagittal and axial planes. Images were scored by 2 radiologists with respect to mesh visibility, delineation of the surrounding tissue, differentiation from other structures, and overall diagnostic use, on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (insufficient) to 4 (excellent). The results were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The mesh shape, possible deformation or fracture, and possible mesh migration were evaluated on the different pulse sequences and compared with the results at surgery and autopsy. RESULTS: The iron-loaded meshes appeared as hypointense signal voids on gradient echo sequences, as a hyperintense line on PCSI, and as a very thin dark line on TSE images. In all animals, a precise depiction of the mesh location and its spatial configuration and integrity was possible by MRI and confirmed by surgical and autopsy results. In all 4 categories and at all 3 time points of imaging, image quality scores were significantly higher for gradient echo imaging (range, 3.60-3.80) compared with PCSI (range, 3.12-3.42) and TSE (range, 1.64-1.89). At day 90, the image quality ratings of gradient echo and PCSI were comparable. In 2 cases, the complete delineation of mesh borders was impossible because of signal voids of adjacent anatomical structures, whereas PCSI helped achieve this differentiation. CONCLUSION: In this rabbit model of iron-loaded implanted abdominal meshes, standard gradient echo imaging was best suitable to assess implant location, integrity, and configuration. In 2 of 10 animals, PCSI helped achieve a complete delineation of mesh borders.

In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic mesh implants are widely used in hernia surgery. To show long-term mesh-related complications such as shrinkage or adhesions, a precise visualization of meshes and their vicinity in vivo is important. By supplementing mesh fibers with ferro particles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help to delineate the mesh itself. This study aimed to demonstrate and quantify time-dependent mesh shrinkage in vivo by MRI. METHODS: Polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) meshes with incorporated superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIOs) were implanted as an abdominal wall replacement in 30 rats. On days 1, 7, 14, or 21, MRI was performed using a gradient echo sequence with repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) of 50/4.6 and a flip angle of 20°. The length, width, and area of the device were measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal images, and geometric deformations were assessed by surgical explantation. RESULTS: In all cases, the meshes were visualized and their area estimated by measuring the length and width of the mesh. The MRI presented a mean area shrinkage in vivo of 13% on day 7, 23% on day 14, and 23% on day 21. Postmortem measurements differed statistically from MRI, with a mean area shrinkage of 23% on day 7, 28% on day 14, and 30% on day 21. Ex vivo measurements of shrinkage showed in vivo measurements to be overestimated approximately 8%. Delineation of the mesh helped to show folding or adhesions close to the intestine. CONCLUSION: Loading of surgical meshes with SPIOs allows their precise visualization during MRI and guarantees an accurate in vivo assessment of their shrinkage. The authors' observation clearly indicates that shrinkage in vivo is remarkably less than that shown by illustrated explantation measurements. The use of MRI with such meshes could be a reliable technique for checking on proper operation of implanted meshes and showing related complications, obviating the need for exploratory open surgical revision.