Educational value of a novel telestration device for surgical coaching-a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Communication is fundamental to effective surgical coaching. This can be challenging for training during image-guided procedures where coaches and trainees need to articulate technical details on a monitor. Telestration devices that annotate on monitors remotely could potentially overcome these limitations and enhance the coaching experience. This study aims to evaluate the value of a novel telestration device in surgical coaching. METHODS: A randomized-controlled trial was designed. All participants watched a video demonstrating the task followed by a baseline performance assessment and randomization into either control group (conventional verbal coaching without telestration) or telestration group (verbal coaching with telestration). Coaching for a simulated laparoscopic small bowel anastomosis on a dry lab model was done by a faculty surgeon. Following the coaching session, participants underwent a post-coaching performance assessment of the same task. Assessments were recorded and rated by blinded reviewers using a modified Global Rating Scale of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). Coaching sessions were also recorded and compared in terms of mentoring moments; guidance misinterpretations, questions/clarifications by trainees, and task completion time. A 5-point Likert scale was administered to obtain feedback. RESULTS: Twenty-four residents participated (control group 13, telestration group 11). Improvements in some elements of the OSATS scale were noted in the Telestration arm but there was no statistical significance in the overall score between the two groups. Mentoring moments were more in the telestration Group. Amongst the telestration Group, 55% felt comfortable that they could perform this task independently, compared to only 8% amongst the control group and 82% would recommend the use of telestration tools here. CONCLUSION: There is demonstrated educational value of this novel telestration device mainly in the non-technical aspects of the interaction by enhancing the coaching experience with improvement in communication and greater mentoring moments between coach and trainee.

The Role of Ablation in Prevention of Recurrent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in preventing arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Although ICD therapies for malignant ventricular arrhythmias can be life-saving, shocks could have deleterious consequences. Substrate-based ablation therapy has become the standard of care to prevent recurrent ICD shocks in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the efficacy and safety of this invasive therapy in the prevention of recurrent ICD shocks in patients with TOF has not been well evaluated. METHODS: Records of a total of 47 consecutive TOF patients (mean age: 43.1 ± 13.2 years, male sex: n = 34 [72.3%]) who underwent ICD implantation for secondary prevention between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty (42.6%) patients underwent invasive therapy (radiofrequency catheter ablation, n = 8; surgical ablation with pulmonary valve replacement, n = 12) before ICD implantation. Twenty-seven patients (57.4%) were managed noninvasively. During follow-up (median 80.5 [interquartile range, 28.5-131.0] months), 2 (10.0%) patients in the invasive group and 10 (37.0%) patients in the noninvasive group received appropriate ICD shocks (P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis showed that invasive therapy was associated with a decreased risk of ICD shocks by 81.1% (odds ratio, 0.189; 95% confidence interval, 0.036-0.990; P = 0.049). Furthermore, invasive therapy was associated with decreased risk of the composite outcomes of ICD shock, death, cardiac transplantation, and hospital admission (odds ratio, 0.090; 95% confidence interval, 0.025-0.365; P = 0.013) compared with noninvasive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive substrate modification therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of ICD shocks and improvement of long-term outcomes in TOF patients.

CONTEXTE: Les défibrillateurs cardioverteurs implantables (DCI) sont efficaces pour prévenir la mort cardiaque subite provoquée par une arythmie chez les patients présentant une tétralogie de Fallot (TF). Bien que le traitement des arythmies ventriculaires malignes par DCI puisse sauver des vies, les chocs administrés peuvent avoir des conséquences délétères. L'ablation du substrat est devenue le traitement de référence pour prévenir l'administration à répétition de chocs par DCI chez les patients atteints d'une cardiomyopathie ischémique. L'efficacité et l'innocuité de ce traitement invasif pour prévenir l'administration de chocs répétés chez les patients présentant une TF n'ont toutefois pas été bien évaluées. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons examiné les cas consécutifs de 47 patients présentant une TF (âge moyen : 43,1 ± 13,2 ans; hommes : n = 34 [72,3 %]) ayant reçu un DCI en prévention secondaire entre 2000 et 2018. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 20 (42,6 %) patients ont subi un traitement invasif (ablation par cathéter par radiofréquence, n = 8; ablation chirurgicale et remplacement de la valve pulmonaire, n = 12) avant l'implantation d'un DCI. Vingt-sept patients (57,4 %) ont été pris en charge de façon non invasive. Au cours de la période de suivi (durée médiane de 80,5 [intervalle interquartile : 28,5 à 131,0] mois), 2 (10,0 %) patients du groupe ayant subi une intervention invasive et 10 (37,0 %) patients du groupe ayant subi une intervention non invasive ont reçu un choc approprié par DCI (p = 0,036). Les résultats de l'analyse par régression logistique montrent que le traitement invasif est associé à une réduction du risque de choc par DCI de 81,1 % (rapport des cotes : 0,189; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : de 0,036 à 0,990; p = 0,049). En outre, le traitement invasif est associé à une réduction du risque de survenue d'un des événements du paramètre d'évaluation composé, soit un choc administré par DCI, le décès, une transplantation cardiaque ou une hospitalisation (rapport des cotes : 0,090; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : de 0,025 à 0,365; p = 0,013) par rapport au traitement non invasif. CONCLUSIONS: La modification invasive du substrat a été associée à une probabilité plus faible de choc administré par DCI et à une amélioration des résultats à long terme chez les patients présentant une TF.

Management of tachyarrhythmias in pregnancy - A review.

The most common arrhythmias detected during pregnancy include sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, and sinus arrhythmia, identified in 0.1% of pregnancies. Isolated premature atrial or ventricular arrhythmias are observed in 0.03% of pregnancies. Arrhythmias may become more frequent during pregnancy or may manifest for the first time.

Lateral tunnel Fontan atrial tachycardia ablation trans-baffle access is not mandatory as the initial strategy.

BACKGROUND: Mapping and ablation of atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly performed in lateral tunnel Fontan (LTF) patients, yet there is little information on the need of baffle puncture to access the pulmonary venous atrium (PVA). This study aimed to evaluate the most common chamber location of critical sites for majority of AT in LTF patients. METHODS: Consecutive LTF patients underwent catheter-based high-density mapping and ablation of AT from Nov. 2015 to Mar. 2019. Critical sites were identified by a combination of activation and entrainment mapping. Acute procedural success was defined as AT termination with ablation and non-inducibility of any AT. Predictors for ablation failure were evaluated in retrospect. RESULTS: Fifteen catheter ablation procedures were performed in 9 patients. A total of 15 clinical ATs (mean TCL 369 ± 91 ms) were mapped. The mechanism was macro re-entry in 11 (73%) and micro re-entry in 2. In 11 ATs (73%), 94 ± 5% of tachycardia cycle length (TCL) were mapped inside the tunnel. The commonest site of successful ablation in the tunnel was on the lateral wall (60%). Trans-baffle access was obtained during 5 of 15 procedures (33%). Overall, procedural success was achieved in 9 of 15 procedures (60%). There were no complications. Recurrence of AT was 42% over a follow-up period of 4.3 ± 3.2 years. Faster TCL of 200-300 ms showed a trend towards ablation failure, (OR 17, 95% CI 0.7 to 423, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation can be performed effectively for ATs in LTF patients usually from inside the tunnel. ATs with critical sites in the PVA are uncommon. This information will help plan ablation in LTF patients without resorting to initial trans-baffle access.