Lung Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis before and during CFTR-Modulator Therapy Using 3D Ultrashort Echo Time MRI.

Background The triple combination of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulators elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (hereafter, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor) has a positive effect on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Purpose To compare three-dimensional (3D) ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI functional lung data to common functional lung parameters in assessing lung function in patients with CF undergoing elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy. Materials and Methods In this prospective feasibility study, 16 participants with CF consented to undergo pulmonary MRI with a breath-hold 3D UTE sequence at baseline (April 2018-June 2019) and follow-up (April-July 2021). Eight participants received elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor after baseline, and eight participants with unchanged treatment served as the control group. Lung function was assessed with body plethysmography and lung clearance index (LCI). Image-based functional lung parameters, such as ventilation inhomogeneity and ventilation defect percentage (VDP), were calculated from signal intensity change between MRI scans at inspiration and expiration. Metrics at baseline and follow-up were compared within groups (permutation test), correlation was tested (Spearman rank correlation), and 95% CIs were calculated (bootstrapping technique). Results MRI ventilation inhomogeneity correlated with LCI at baseline (r = 0.92, P < .001) and follow-up (r = 0.81, P = .002). Mean MRI ventilation inhomogeneity (baseline, 0.74 ± 0.15 [SD]; follow-up, 0.64 ± 0.11; P = .02) and mean VDP (baseline, 14.1% ± 7.4; follow-up, 8.5% ± 3.3; P = .02) decreased from baseline to follow-up in the treatment group. Lung function was stable over time (mean LCI: 9.3 turnovers ± 4.1 at baseline vs 11.5 turnovers ± 7.4 at follow-up; P = .34) in the control group. In all participants, correlation of forced expiratory volume in 1 second with MRI ventilation inhomogeneity was good at baseline (r = -0.61, P = .01) but poor during follow-up (r = -0.06, P = .82). Conclusion Noncontrast 3D UTE lung MRI functional parameters of ventilation inhomogeneity and VDP can be used to assess lung function over time in patients with CF and can add regional information to established global parameters, such as LCI. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Iwasawa in this issue.

Standardized assessment of vascular reconstruction kernels in photon-counting CT angiographies of the leg using a continuous extracorporeal perfusion model.

This study evaluated the influence of different vascular reconstruction kernels on the image quality of CT angiographies of the lower extremity runoff using a 1st-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) compared with dose-matched examinations on a 3rd-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). Inducing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in a human cadaveric model, we performed CT angiographies of eight upper leg arterial runoffs with radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (CTDIvol 5 mGy). Reconstructions were executed with different vascular kernels, matching the individual modulation transfer functions between scanners. Signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were computed to assess objective image quality. Six radiologists evaluated image quality subjectively using a forced-choice pairwise comparison tool. Interrater agreement was determined by calculating Kendall's concordance coefficient (W). The intraluminal attenuation of PCD-CT images was significantly higher than of EID-CT (414.7 ± 27.3 HU vs. 329.3 ± 24.5 HU; p < 0.001). Using comparable kernels, image noise with PCD-CT was significantly lower than with EID-CT (p ≤ 0.044). Correspondingly, SNR and CNR were approximately twofold higher for PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Increasing the spatial frequency for PCD-CT reconstructions by one level resulted in similar metrics compared to EID-CT (CNRfat; EID-CT Bv49: 21.7 ± 3.7 versus PCD-CT Bv60: 21.4 ± 3.5). Overall image quality of PCD-CTA achieved ratings superior to EID-CTA irrespective of the used reconstruction kernels (best: PCD-CT Bv60; worst: EID-CT Bv40; p < 0.001). Interrater agreement was good (W = 0.78). Concluding, PCD-CT offers superior intraluminal attenuation, SNR, and CNR compared to EID-CT in angiographies of the upper leg arterial runoff. Combined with improved subjective image quality, PCD-CT facilitates the use of sharper convolution kernels and ultimately bears the potential of improved vascular structure assessability.

Photon-Counting Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT Angiography of the Lower Extremity in a Human Cadaveric Model With Continuous Extracorporeal Perfusion.

OBJECTIVES: Detailed visualization of the arterial runoff is mandatory for the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. This study aims to compare the performance of a first-generation photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to a third-generation energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography angiographies of 8 upper leg arterial runoffs were performed on human cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion. For both PCD-CT and EID-CT, radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-/medium-/high-dose: CTDI Vol = 3/5/10 mGy) were used. All scans were performed with standard collimation (PCD-CT: 144 × 0.4 mm; EID-CT: 96 × 0.6 mm), a pitch factor of 0.4, and a gantry rotation time of 1.0 second. Reformatting of data included the use of comparable vascular kernels (Bv 48/49), a slice thickness and increment of 1.0 mm, and a field of view of 150 × 150 mm. Eight radiologists evaluated image quality independently using a browser-based pairwise forced-choice comparison setup. Kendall concordance coefficient ( W ) was calculated to estimate interrater agreement. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared based on 1-way analyses of variance and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Low-dose PCD-CT achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio/CNR values compared with high-dose EID-CT ( P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis suggested that an EID-CT scan with a CTDI Vol of at least 15.5 mGy was required to match the CNR value of low-dose PCD-CT. Intraluminal contrast attenuation was higher in PCD-CT than EID-CT, irrespective of dose level (415.0 ± 31.9 HU vs 329.2 ± 29.4 HU; P < 0.001). Subjective image quality of low-dose PCD-CT was considered superior to high-dose EID-CT ( P < 0.001). Interrater agreement was high ( W = 0.989). CONCLUSIONS: Using cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion allows for intraindividual image quality comparisons between PCD-CT and EID-CT on variable dose levels. With superior luminal contrast attenuation and denoising in angiographies of the peripheral arterial runoff, PCD-CT displayed potential for radiation saving of up to 83% compared with EID-CT.

Artificial-intelligence-enhanced synthetic thick slabs versus standard slices in digital breast tomosynthesis.

OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can provide additional information over mammography, albeit at the cost of prolonged reading time. This study retrospectively investigated the impact of reading enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs instead of standard 1 mm slices on interpretation time and readers performance in a diagnostic assessment centre. METHODS: Three radiologists (R1-3; 6/4/2 years of breast imaging experience) reviewed 111 diagnostic DBT examinations. Two datasets were interpreted independently for each patient, with one set containing artificial-intelligence-enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs with 3 mm overlap, while the other set comprised standard 1 mm slices. Blinded to histology and follow-up, readers noted individual BIRADS categories and diagnostic confidence while reading time was recorded. Among the 111 examinations, 70 findings were histopathologically correlated including 56 malignancies. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between BIRADS categories assigned based on 6 mm vs 1 mm datasets (p ≥ 0.317). Diagnostic accuracy was comparable for 6 mm and 1 mm readings (R1: 87.0% vs 87.0%; R2: 86.1% vs 87.0%; R3: 80.0% vs 84.4%; p ≥ 0.125) with high interrater agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.848 vs 0.865). One reader reported higher confidence with 1 mm slices (R1: p = 0.033). Reading time was substantially shorter when interpreting 6 mm slabs compared to 1 mm slices (R1: 33.5 vs 46.2; R2: 49.1 vs 64.8; R3: 39.5 vs 67.2 sec; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial-intelligence-enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs allow for substantial interpretation time reduction in diagnostic DBT without a decrease in reader accuracy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A simplified slab-only protocol instead of 1 mm slices may offset the higher reading time without a loss of diagnosis-relevant image information in first and second readings. Further evaluations are required regarding workflow implications, particularly in screening settings.

Twin Robotic Gantry-Free Cone-Beam CT in Acute Elbow Trauma.

Background Posttraumatic CT imaging of the elbow can be challenging when patient mobility is limited. Gantry-free cone-beam CT (CBCT) with a twin robotic radiography system offers greater degrees of positioning freedom for three-dimensional elbow scans over gantry-based multidetector CT (MDCT), but studies analyzing their clinical value remain lacking. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of gantry-free CBCT versus two-dimensional radiography in adults and children with acute elbow trauma. Materials and Methods In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with elbow trauma and positioning difficulty in a gantry-based MDCT who underwent three-dimensional elbow imaging with a gantry-free CBCT after radiography were enrolled between January 2021 and April 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital. Imaging data sets were independently analyzed for fracture presence, articular involvement, and multi-fragment injuries by three radiologists. Diagnostic performance was calculated individually with surgical reports serving as the reference standard. Differences between radiography and CBCT were compared with the McNemar test. Diagnostic confidence was estimated subjectively by each reader, and results were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Elbow examinations of 23 adults and children (mean age ± SD, 49 years ± 23; seven women) were included with individual assessment of humerus, radius, and ulna (69 bones; 36 fractured). Multi-fragmentary fracture patterns and involvement of articular surfaces were ascertained in 28 and 30 bones, respectively. CBCT allowed for similar or higher sensitivity compared with radiography in the assessment of fractures (range for three readers, 94%-100% vs 72%-81%; respectively, P ≤ .06-.008), articular surface involvement (90%-97% vs 73%-87%; P ≤ .25), and multi-fragmentary patterns (96%-96% vs 68%-75%; P ≤ .03). Readers' diagnostic confidence improved considerably with access to CBCT data sets versus radiographs (all P ≤ .001). For CBCT, the median dose-length product was 70.9 mGy · cm, and the volume CT dose index was 4.4 mGy. Conclusion In acute elbow injuries, gantry-free cone-beam CT enabled improved detection of fractures, articular involvement, and multi-fragmentary patterns compared with two-dimensional radiography. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES: Trauma evaluation of extremities can be challenging in conventional radiography. A multi-use x-ray system with cone-beam CT (CBCT) option facilitates ancillary 3-D imaging without repositioning. We assessed the clinical value of CBCT scans by analyzing the influence of additional findings on therapy. METHODS: Ninety-two patients underwent radiography and subsequent CBCT imaging with the twin robotic scanner (76 wrist/hand/finger and 16 ankle/foot/toe trauma scans). Reports by on-call radiologists before and after CBCT were compared regarding fracture detection, joint affliction, comminuted injuries, and diagnostic confidence. An orthopedic surgeon recommended therapy based on reported findings. Surgical reports (N = 52) and clinical follow-up (N = 85) were used as reference standard. RESULTS: CBCT detected more fractures (83/64 of 85), joint involvements (69/53 of 71), and multi-fragment situations (68/50 of 70) than radiography (all p < 0.001). Six fractures suspected in radiographs were ruled out by CBCT. Treatment changes based on additional information from CBCT were recommended in 29 patients (31.5%). While agreement between advised therapy before CBCT and actual treatment was moderate (κ = 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.35-0.47]; p < 0.001), agreement after CBCT was almost perfect (κ = 0.88 [0.83-0.93]; p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased considerably for CBCT studies (p < 0.001). Median effective dose for CBCT was 4.3 µSv [3.3-5.3 µSv] compared to 0.2 µSv [0.1-0.2 µSv] for radiography. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT provides advantages for the evaluation of acute small bone and joint trauma by detecting and excluding extremity fractures and fracture-related findings more reliably than radiographs. Additional findings induced therapy change in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact. KEY POINTS: • With cone-beam CT, extremity fractures and fracture-related findings can be detected and ruled out more reliably than with conventional radiography. • Additional diagnostic information provided by cone-beam CT scans has substantial impact on therapy in small bone and joint trauma. • For distal extremity injury assessment, one-stop-shop imaging without repositioning is feasible with the twin robotic x-ray system.