Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT) Screencasts: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Asynchronous Learning on an Inpatient Hematology-Oncology Teaching Service.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of just-in-time teaching (JiTT) screencasts for graduate medical education on an inpatient adult hematology-oncology service (HOS) setting is not known. Our preceding pilot data identified six high-yield topics for this setting. The study objective was to evaluate screencast educational efficacy. METHODS: Internal medicine residents scheduled to start a rotation on the primary HOS of an academic medical center were eligible for this parallel, unblinded, randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation. Participants underwent block randomization to the usual educational curriculum either with or without access to a series of novel screencasts; all participants received an anonymous online end-of-rotation survey and a $20 gift certificate upon completion. The primary outcome was the change in attitude among learners, measured as their self-reported confidence for managing the clinical topics. RESULTS: From 12/9/2019 through 6/15/2020, accrual was completed with 67 of 78 eligible residents (86%) enrolled and randomized. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and participant response rate was 91%. Sixty-four percent of residents in the treatment arm rated their clinical management comfort level as "comfortable" or "very comfortable" versus 21% of residents in the usual education arm (p = 0.001), estimated difference = 43% (95% CI: 21-66%), using a prespecified cumulative cutoff score. Treatment arm participants reported that the screencasts improved medical oncology knowledge base (100%), would improve their care for cancer patients (92%), and had an enjoyable format (96%). CONCLUSION: Residents on a busy inpatient HOS found that a JiTT screencast increased clinical comfort level in the management of HOS-specific patient problems.

Pan-Pseudothrombocytopenia in COVID-19: A Harbinger for Lethal Arterial Thrombosis?

Pseudothrombocytopenia in the setting of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy prompts the question whether it is representative of increased platelet aggregation activity in vivo.

Association between glycemic control, age, and outcomes among intensively treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of hyperglycemia and glycemic variability during intensive acute myeloid leukemia therapy (AML) on outcomes by age. METHODS: Retrospective study of 262 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML hospitalized for intensive induction. Hyperglycemia was assessed by mean blood glucose (BG) (mg/dL) during hospitalization and glycemic variability was determined by the standard deviation (SD) of mean BG. Outcomes were complete remission ± incomplete count recovery (CR + CRi), and overall survival (OS). We used logistic regression to evaluate CR + CRi, and Cox proportional hazard models for OS, stratified by age (< 60 vs ≥ 60 years). RESULTS: Older patients (N = 138, median age 70) had higher baseline comorbidity (CCI > 1 60.1% vs 25.8%) and prevalence of diabetes (20.3% vs 7.3%) compared to younger (N = 124, median age 47). The mean ± SD number of BG values obtained per patient during hospitalization was 61 ± 71. The mean (± SD) glucose (mg/dL) during hospitalization was 121.7 (25.9) in older patients (≥ 60 years) versus 111.6 (16.4) in younger. In older patients, higher mean glucose and greater glycemic variability were associated with lower odds of remission (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93 and OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88 respectively, per 10-unit increase) and higher mortality rates (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21 and HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26, respectively, per 10-unit increase) in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations that hyperglycemia and increased glycemic variability were associated with lower remission rates and increased mortality in older patients suggest glycemic control may be a potentially modifiable factor to improve AML outcomes.

Correlating S100B with disease course in a case of new onset, acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP): Could this be a new predictive biomarker in TTP?

Acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an aggressive thrombotic microangiopathy that if not treated, can have a 90% mortality rate. Clinical manifestations of this disease include profound thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and end-organ dysfunction. Neurologic symptoms can occur in 80% of patients and range from mild confusion to coma (Scully et al., Br J Haematol 142:819-826). Here, we present the clinical course of a patient diagnosed with new onset acquired TTP who presented with neurologic changes that waxed and waned during her disease course. In addition to usual clinical and laboratory markers for TTP severity and activity, we also collected and analyzed the protein S100B, an astroglial protein studied as a marker for central nervous system injury and impairment of the blood-brain barrier. Our hypothesis here is that because TTP involves endovascular damage, S100B could function as a biomarker for neurologic dysfunction and ultimately, predict disease activity. As illustrated in this case, our patient's S100B levels did appear to correlate with TTP disease activity and the trajectory of this protein seemed a better predictor of cognitive function. Furthermore, increased S100B velocity seemed to be the earliest indicator of a refractory TTP disease process requiring more intensive plasma exchange (TPE) therapy regimen. Therefore, we would suggest that S100B is a promising predictive biomarker of disease activity in guiding the intensity of TPE therapy for TTP as well as cognitive function.