ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of modified and non-modified tip designs of both stainless steel and nickel-titanium endodontic hand files on root canal preparation. Root canals of mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were prepared using a quarter-turn-pull technique. The experimental design permitted comparison of the effects of nickel-titanium alloy construction or file tip modification alone, with effects when these two factors were incorporated into a single file design. Transportation, centering ratio, and dentin removal were evaluated using a modified Bramante technique. Nickel-titanium files, regardless of tip design, remained significantly more centered and demonstrated less apical transportation than stainless steel files at size 25. When instrumentation was continued to size 40 apically with step-back, there were no significant differences in transportation in the apical or coronal sections. However, during instrumentation to size 40 with step-back, the combination of modified tip and nickel-titanium alloy produced significantly more transportation and dentin removal, as well as greater deviation from the center at the mid-root level than did other file designs. Thus, of the file design parameters evaluated in this study, construction from nickel-titanium was most important in defining canal configuration at small file sizes in the apical region. Although the combination of nickel-titanium and modified tip design resulted in more transportation at larger file sizes in the midroot region, such alterations in canal configuration may be of little importance clinically. Nonetheless, it is suggested that other factors, such as tactile sensation and instrumentation technique, should be considered as important as the type of alloy or tip design.
