Branched-chain ketoacid co-ingestion with protein lowers amino acid oxidation during hemodialysis: A randomized controlled cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hemodialysis removes amino acids from the circulation, thereby stimulating muscle proteolysis. Protein ingestion during hemodialysis can compensate for amino acid removal but may also increase uremic toxin production. Branched-chain ketoacid (BCKA) co-ingestion may provide an additional anabolic stimulus without adding to uremic toxin accumulation. In the present study we assessed the impact of BCKA co-ingestion with protein on forearm amino acid balance and amino acid oxidation during hemodialysis. METHODS: Nine patients (age: 73 ± 10 y) on chronic hemodialysis participated in this crossover trial. During two 4-h hemodialysis sessions, patients ingested 18 g protein with (PRO + BCKA) or without (PRO) 9 g BCKAs in a randomized order. Test beverages were labeled with L-[ring-13C6]-phenylalanine and provided throughout the last 3 h of hemodialysis as 18 equal sips consumed with 10-min intervals. Arterial and venous plasma as well as breath samples were collected frequently throughout hemodialysis. RESULTS: Arterial plasma total amino acid (TAA) concentrations during PRO and PRO + BCKA treatments were significantly lower after 1 h of hemodialysis (2.6 ± 0.3 and 2.6 ± 0.3 mmol/L, respectively) when compared to pre-hemodialysis concentrations (4.2 ± 1.0 and 4.0 ± 0.5 mmol/L, respectively; time effect: P < 0.001). Arterial plasma TAA concentrations increased throughout test beverage ingestion (time effect: P = 0.027) without differences between treatments (time∗treatment: P = 0.62). Forearm arteriovenous TAA balance during test beverage ingestion did not differ between timepoints (time effect: P = 0.31) or treatments (time∗treatment: P = 0.34). Whole-body phenylalanine oxidation was 33 ± 16% lower during PRO + BCKA when compared to PRO treatments (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BCKA co-ingestion with protein during hemodialysis does not improve forearm net protein balance but lowers amino acid oxidation.

Intradialytic Protein Ingestion and Exercise do Not Compromise Uremic Toxin Removal Throughout Hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Dietary protein and physical activity interventions are increasingly implemented during hemodialysis to support muscle maintenance in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although muscle maintenance is important, adequate removal of uremic toxins throughout hemodialysis is the primary concern for patients. It remains to be established whether intradialytic protein ingestion and/or exercise modulate uremic toxin removal during hemodialysis. METHODS: We recruited 10 patients with ESRD (age: 65 ± 16 y, BMI: 24.2 ± 4.8 kg/m2) on chronic hemodialysis treatment to participate in this randomized cross-over trial. During hemodialysis, patients were assigned to ingest 40 g protein or a nonprotein placebo both at rest (protein [PRO] and placebo [PLA], respectively) and following 30 min of exercise (PRO + exercise [EX] and PLA + EX, respectively). Blood and spent dialysate samples were collected throughout hemodialysis to assess reduction ratios and removal of urea, creatinine, phosphate, cystatin C, and indoxyl sulfate. RESULTS: The reduction ratios of urea and indoxyl sulfate were higher during PLA (76 ± 6% and 46 ± 9%, respectively) and PLA + EX interventions (77 ± 5% and 45 ± 10%, respectively) when compared to PRO (72 ± 4% and 40 ± 8%, respectively) and PRO + EX interventions (73 ± 4% and 43 ± 7%, respectively; protein effect: P = .001 and P = .023, respectively; exercise effect: P = .25 and P = .52, respectively). Nonetheless, protein ingestion resulted in greater urea removal (P = .046) during hemodialysis. Reduction ratios and removal of creatinine, phosphate, and cystatin C during hemodialysis did not differ following intradialytic protein ingestion or exercise (protein effect: P > .05; exercise effect: P>.05). Urea, creatinine, and phosphate removal were greater throughout the period with intradialytic exercise during PLA + EX and PRO + EX interventions when compared to the same period during PLA and PRO interventions (exercise effect: P = .034, P = .039, and P = .022, respectively). CONCLUSION: The removal of uremic toxins is not compromised by protein feeding and/or exercise implementation during hemodialysis in patients with ESRD.