Axonal Injury with Persistent Neuropathy following Popliteal Nerve Block for Cheilectomy Surgery.

Peripheral nerve blocks are often used for foot and ankle surgery. The occurrence of persistent neurological symptoms thereafter is very rare. Preventive strategies pose no guarantee and uncovering true etiology is often complicated. We discuss a case in which a young, healthy patient developed nerve damage after an uneventful popliteal block and cheilectomy. Nerve conduction studies revealed axonal injury in the distribution area of the sciatic nerve. The neurological symptoms persisted for more than 12 months, emotionally affecting the patient greatly. Patients will primarily report to the orthopedic surgeon, for whom cooperation with anaesthesia and neurology is of importance. Anesthetic involvement probably improves patient satisfaction during complication management.

Potentially curable recurrent disease after surgically managed non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients.

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend risk-adapted follow-up (FU) strategies after (partial) nephrectomy in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since current systemic therapy does not cure metastatic RCC, only timely detected recurrence accessible for local therapy is potentially curable. This study analyzed the rate and management of potentially curable recurrences per risk group. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including non-metastatic RCC patients who underwent (partial) nephrectomy from 2004 to 2011, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Risk stratification was by Leibovich score (clear cell subtype) and UICC/AJCC grading (other subtypes). Recurrence, time to recurrence, symptoms and detection method were documented. Isolated local recurrence, solitary- and oligometastases (≤3 lesions, single site) were considered potentially curable. RESULTS: Among 234 patients, followed during a median of 61.9 months, 68 patients (29.1 %) developed a recurrence of which 28 (41.2 %) were considered potentially curable. The 5-year risk of recurrence for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients was 7.8, 26.3 and 59.1 % of which 71.4, 52.2 and 23.1 % were considered potentially curable, respectively. In high-risk patients, incurable recurrence was detected after a median of 7.9 (3.7-17.2) months versus 13.9 (6-41.3) months for potentially curable lesions. Only 13 of potentially curable lesions (46 %) received local therapy. CONCLUSION: FU protocols should be adapted to the recurrence pattern of potentially curable disease. Most of the benefit may be achieved in intermediate-risk and high-risk-patients free of recurrence 1 year after surgery. Despite frequent imaging, only 13 patients (5.6 % of all patients followed) were managed with local therapy of whom only 4 remained free of disease.

"Are CRT upgrade procedures more complex and associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations?" A single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine whether cardiac resynchronisation therapy upgrade procedures are more complex and associated with more complications than de novo implantations. METHOD: We retrospectively compared 134 upgrade procedures performed between 2006-2012 with a random, equally sized, sample of de novo CRT device implantations in the same period. Procedural data and the occurrence of periprocedural (≤ 30 days) and long-term device-related (≤ 1 year) complications were analysed. Complications with consequences were defined as those in need of adjustment of standard care. RESULTS: Median time to upgrade was 57 (31-115) months. There were no significant differences in procedure duration, radiation time or total hospitalisation between upgrades and de novo implantations. Perioperative complications occurred in 6.7 % of upgrade patients and in 9.0 % of de novo patients. The most frequently seen complications were phrenic nerve stimulation, coronary sinus dissection and pocket haematoma. Procedure success was comparable (upgrade: 98.5 % versus de novo: 96.3 %). A total of 236 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. Ten (4.2 %) patients had a long-term device-related complication with consequences including phrenic nerve stimulation, lead dislodgement/dysfunction, and infection (upgrade: 3.5 % versus de novo: 4.9 %). CONCLUSION: Upgrade procedures are not more complex nor associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations.