Endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer by Acquire 22G TBNB versus regular 22G TBNA needles: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and molecular profiling has become standard of care but cytological samples frequently contain insufficient tumor cells. The 22G Acquire needle with Franseen needle tip was developed to perform transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB) with improved tissue specimens. This study evaluated if the 22G Acquire TBNB needle results in enhanced PD-L1 suitability rate compared to the regular Expect 22G TBNA needle. METHODS: in this multi-center randomized clinical trial (Netherlands Trial Register NL7701), patients with suspected (N)SCLC and an indication for mediastinal/hilar staging or lung tumor diagnosis were recruited in five university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, Poland, Italy and Czech Republic. Patients were randomized (1:1) between the two needles. Two blinded reference pathologists evaluated the samples. The primary outcome was PD-L1 suitability rate in patients with a final diagnosis of lung cancer. In case no malignancy was diagnosed, the reference standard was surgical verification or 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: 154 patients were randomized (n = 76 Acquire TBNB; n = 78 Expect TBNA) of which 92.9% (n = 143) had a final malignant diagnosis. Suitability for PD-L1 analysis was 80.0% (n = 56/70; 95 %CI 0.68-0.94) with the Acquire needle and 76.7% (n = 56/73; 95 %CI 0.65-0.85) with the Expect needle (p = 0.633). Acquire TBNB needle specimens provided more frequent superior quality (65.3% (95 %CI 0.57-0.73) vs 49.4% (95 %CI 0.41-0.57, p = 0.005) and contained more tissue cores (72.0% (95 %CI 0.60-0.81) vs 41.0% (95 %CI 0.31-0.54, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in tissue adequacy, suitability for molecular analysis and sensitivity for malignancy and N2/N3 disease. CONCLUSION: The 22G Acquire TBNB needle procured improved quality tissue specimens compared to the Expect TBNA needle but this did not result in an improved the suitability rate for PD-L1 analysis.

Endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer by Acquire 22G TBNB versus regular 22G TBNA needles: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is crucial because it directs treatment and prognosis. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) are important in this process by sampling hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes and centrally located lung tumours. With the upcoming of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, assessment of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and molecular profiling has become important but is often impossible in cytological samples obtained through standard 22G TBNA needles. Recently, a three-pronged cutting edge 22G needle was developed that allows for transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB). Our objective is to determine if EBUS/EUS-B-guided nodal/lung tumour sampling with Acquire 22G TBNB needles results in an improved suitability rate for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in comparison to standard 22G TBNA needles in patients with a final diagnosis of lung cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an investigator-initiated, parallel group randomised clinical trial. Patients are recruited at respiratory medicine outpatient clinics of participating university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, Poland and Italy. In total 158 adult patients with (suspected) lung cancer are included if they have an indication for mediastinal/hilar lymph node or lung tumour sampling by EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-B-FNA based on current clinical guidelines. Web-based randomisation between the two needles will be performed. Samples obtained from mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and/or primary tumour will be processed for cytology smears and cell block analysis and reviewed by blinded reference pathologists. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. Patients with missing data will be excluded from analysis for that specific variable but included in the analysis of other variables. This study is financially supported by Boston Scientific. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC)). Dissemination will involve publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7701; Pre-results.

Endobronchial ultrasound for T4 staging in patients with resectable NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: In lung cancer patients, accurate assessment of mediastinal and vascular tumor invasion (stage T4) is crucial for optimal treatment allocation and to prevent unnecessary thoracotomies. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for T4-status in patients with centrally located lung cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective study among consecutive patients who underwent EBUS for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in four hospitals in The Netherlands (Amsterdam, Leiden), Italy (Bologna) and Poland (Zakopane) between 04-2012 and 04-2019. Patients were included if the primary tumor was detected by EBUS and subsequent surgical-pathological staging was performed, which served as the reference standard. T4-status was extracted from EBUS and pathology reports. Chest CT's were re-reviewed for T4-status. RESULTS: 104 patients with lung cancer in whom EBUS detected the primary tumour, and who underwent subsequent surgical-pathological staging were included. 36 patients (35 %) had T4-status, based on vascular (n = 17), mediastinal (n = 15), both vascular and mediastinal (n = 3), or oesophageal invasion (n = 1). For EBUS, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for T4-status were (n = 104): 63.9 % (95 %CI 46.2-79.2 %), 92.6 % (83.7-97.6 %), 82.1 % (65.6-91.7 %), and 82.9 % (75.7-88.2 %), respectively. For chest CT (n = 72): 61.5 % (95 %CI 40.6-79.8 %), 37.0 % (23.2-52.5 %), 35.6 % (27.5-44.6 %), and 63.0 % (47.9-75.9 %), respectively. When combining CT and EBUS with concordant T4 status (n = 33): 90.9 % (95 %CI 58.7-99.8 %), 77.3 % (54.6-92.20 %), 66.7 % (47.5-81.6 %), and 94.4 % (721-99.1%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both EBUS and CT alone are inaccurate for assessing T4-status as standalone test. However, combining a negative EBUS with a negative CT may rule out T4-status with high certainty.

Intracardiac EUS-B-Guided FNA for Diagnosing Cardiac Tumors.

Primary cardiac tumors are extremely rare. Obtaining a tissue diagnosis is difficult and commonly requires open-heart surgery with associated morbidity. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS with the EBUS scope (EUS-B) provide real-time sampling of centrally located lung tumors and mediastinal lymph nodes. They also provide an excellent view of the left atrium, since it is located adjacent to the esophagus. To date, left atrium tumor diagnostics by endosonography is poorly explored. We describe 2 exceptional diagnostic cases of left atrium tumors in which cardiac surgery was hazardous due to the clinical condition or previous surgical interventions. During EUS-B-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the left atrial masses were successfully and safely sampled, revealing a Burkitt lymphoma and a synovial sarcoma. FNA including cell block analysis enabled specific tumor diagnosis and molecular subtyping. Our findings suggest that in selected cases, linear endosonography qualifies as a minimally invasive technique for intracardiac tumor diagnostics.

Endobronchial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Centrally Located Lung Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining a tissue diagnosis of centrally located lung tumors in patients presenting without endobronchial abnormalities is challenging, and therefore a considerable diagnostic problem. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of linear endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of centrally located lung tumors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42017080968) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science till November 18, 2018 for studies that evaluated the yield and/or sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors. We assessed the study quality using QUADAS-2 and performed random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5,657 manuscripts were identified; of these 14 were considered for the study, including 1,175 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing an intrapulmonary tumor. All studies had a high risk of bias or applicability concerns, predominately regarding patient selection. The average yield of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) and average sensitivity for diagnosing malignant tumors was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94). Among studies reporting this information, EBUS-related complications occurred in 5.4% of patients (42/721). CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA has a high yield and sensitivity for diagnosing centrally located lung tumors and is safe in selected patients. Prospective studies are recommended to evaluate the routine use of this procedure for diagnosing intrapulmonary tumors.

Esophageal ultrasound (EUS) assessment of T4 status in NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal and central large vessels (T4) invasion by lung cancer is often difficult to assess preoperatively due to the limited accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest. Esophageal ultrasound (EUS) can visualize the relationship of para-esophageally located lung tumors to surrounding mediastinal structures. AIM: To assess the value of EUS for detecting mediastinal invasion (T4) of centrally located lung tumors. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and in whom the primary tumor was detected by EUS and who subsequently underwent surgical- pathological staging (2000-2016) were retrospectively selected from two university hospitals in The Netherlands. T status of the lung tumor was reviewed based on EUS, CT and thoracotomy findings. Surgical- pathological staging was the reference standard. RESULTS: In 426 patients, a lung malignancy was detected by EUS of which 74 subjects subsequently underwent surgical- pathological staging. 19 patients (26%) were diagnosed with stage T4 based on vascular (n=8, 42%) or mediastinal (n=8, 42%) invasion or both (n=2, 11%), one patient (5%) had vertebral involvement. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for assessing T4 status were: for EUS (n=74); 42%, 95%, 73%, 83%, for chest CT (n=66); 76%, 61%, 41%, 88% and the combination of EUS and chest CT (both positive or negative for T4, (n=34); 83%, 100%, 100% 97%. CONCLUSION: EUS has a high specificity and NPV for the T4 assessment of lung tumors located para-esophageally and offers further value to chest CT scan.