Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 466(6): 1438-43, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18299948

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THA are a popular alternative to overcome wear concerns in traditional metal-polyethylene bearings. However, squeaking is a potentially worrisome phenomenon in ceramic-on-ceramic THAs which we observed in some of our patients. We reviewed all 42 patients who underwent 43 ceramic-on-ceramic noncemented THAs during the time of the study. Squeaking, defined as a reproducible sound of squeaking, clicking, or grating, occurred in nine of 43 implants (20.9%). Standard radiographs were normal. We used CT imaging to determine cup anteversion and inclination angles, comparing the squeaking hips with those of a randomly selected control group, but found no differences. We then hypothesized specific design features (stem size, cup size, head size, and neck length of the head) would be risk factors for squeaking. We found a difference in neck length between squeaking and nonsqueaking implants. A neck length of -4 mm or shorter resulted in a relative risk of 5.56 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-27.01) for squeaking. We found a high incidence of squeaking in our population, and we believe this phenomenon is an underreported side effect of these types of bearings. A short neck length of the femoral implant was a risk factor for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Oxide , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Diseases/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Joint Diseases/etiology , Joint Diseases/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Sound
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...