Optimal configuration of the spiral linking technique for tendon repair. Biomechanical evaluation.

A previous study described a new spiral linking technique for tendon repairs and demonstrated that it was strong enough to be used in clinical practice as an alternative to the Pulvertaft tendon weave repair. However the repairs were less stiff, needed slightly more tendon length for the same repair and were a little bulkier. In this study two variables have been changed with a view to improving the spiral technique. At first the number of spirals was reduced consecutively, keeping the same number of standard mattress sutures. Once the optimal number of spirals had been identified, repairs with different numbers of sutures were tested using an alternative cross-stitch technique. The spiral repair technique using two spirals linked with six sutures was at least as strong and stiff as a four-weave Pulvertaft technique and was also easier to do.

An in vitro biomechanical study comparing the spiral linking technique against the pulvertaft weave for tendon repair.

A new spiral linking technique for tendon repair in which one end of the tendon is spiralled around the other end has been developed. Using pig trotter extensor tendons, the Pulvertaft weave technique was compared with this new technique. Twenty-five repairs using each technique were tested by tensile loading with an Instron testing machine. The spiral linking technique matched the strength of Pulvertaft method: the mean peak loads were 102 and 105 N, respectively. The Pulvertaft weave was stiffer than the spiral linking technique: mean stiffness of 11.1 and 6.7 N/mm, respectively. The spiral linking technique also absorbed considerably more energy: energy absorbed prior to failure to 90% of peak load, 1.75 and 1.13 kN mm, respectively. In conclusion, the spiral linking technique appears as strong as the Pulvertaft weave and we believe it is easier to perform.