Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 66(2): 129-34, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20117349

ABSTRACT

Enzyme immunoassays are currently the most common tests used in the clinical laboratory for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins; however, significant problems with their performance have recently been described. We prospectively reevaluated the Meridian Premier C. difficile toxin A/B assay with direct comparison to a 2-step algorithm that screened for C. difficile common antigen and compared cytotoxin and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as confirmatory procedures. The Premier assay lacked sufficient sensitivity, missing 25% of true-positive samples. PCR was the most sensitive method and the only procedure that allowed same day testing and reporting.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/analysis , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Cytotoxins/toxicity , Enterotoxins/analysis , Glutamate Dehydrogenase/analysis , Immunoassay/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Bacterial Proteins/toxicity , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Bacterial Toxins/toxicity , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/immunology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Colitis/microbiology , Enterotoxins/genetics , Enterotoxins/immunology , Enterotoxins/toxicity , Glutamate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Glutamate Dehydrogenase/immunology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...