Cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid test screening of volunteer blood donations for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of adding nucleic acid testing (NAT) to serological (antibody and antigen) screening protocols for donated blood in the United States (US) with the purpose of reducing the risks of transfusion-transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The costs, health consequences and cost-effectiveness of adding either minipool or individual-donor NAT to serological screening (SS) testing were estimated using a decision-analysis model. RESULTS: With the given modelling assumptions, adding minipool NAT would avoid an estimated 37, 128 and eight cases of HBV, HCV and HIV, respectively, and save approximately 53 additional years of life and 102 additional quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with SS, at a net cost of $154 million. SS + minipool NAT - p24 compared with SS alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.5 million per QALY gained (range in sensitivity analysis $1.0-2.1 million per QALY gained) in this US analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The cost effectiveness of adding NAT screening is outside the typical range for most healthcare interventions, but not for established blood safety measures.

Child care center staff contribute to physician visits and pressure for antibiotic prescription.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether child care center (CCC) providers contribute to unnecessary physician referrals and antibiotic prescriptions in young children with upper respiratory tract infections. DESIGN: A survey using a structured telephone questionnaire between May 3, 1998, and July 27, 1998. PARTICIPANTS: Child care center providers from randomly selected licensed Ontario CCCs accepting diapered children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning physician referral; exclusion; and antibiotic use for children with upper respiratory tract infections. Indications for exclusion were compared with published Canadian guidelines. RESULTS: Contact was made with 42 eligible CCCs to obtain the requisite number of 36 participants (participation rate, 86%). Of the 36 centers, staff reported advising that children visit a physician for colored nasal discharge in 28 (78%), for productive cough in 23 (64%), and for unusual behavior in 9 (25%). Also of the 36 centers, staff reported excluding children for colored nasal discharge in 20 (56%), for productive cough in 16 (44%), and for unusual behavior in 15 (42%). Antibiotics were thought useful for nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections to prevent the spread of infection in 9 (26%), to speed up recovery in 7 (21%), and to prevent bacterial infection in 13 (38%) of 34 centers. In the previous 6 months, 25 (69%) of 36 staff members reported making an exception to exclusion because a child had an antibiotic prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Many children are referred by CCC staff to physicians contrary to established guidelines. As staff must act on behalf of parents, a low threshold for referral is not unreasonable. However, this survey confirms that CCC staff recommend children to receive antibiotics and exclude children inappropriately. These practices are based on incomplete knowledge. Research on appropriate management of upper respiratory tract infections by CCC staff is needed. Education to correct specific knowledge deficits should be initiated.

Meta-analysis of the effect of latanoprost and brimonidine on intraocular pressure in the treatment of glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to indirectly quantify and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of latanoprost and brimonidine eye drops at baseline and after 3 and 6 months in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: This meta-analysis combined data from all randomized controlled trials comparing the effects on IOP of latanoprost and brimonidine treatment in adults with a baseline IOP > or =20 mm Hg. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for reports of the ophthalmic administration of either drug versus the other, placebo, or active therapy. Included studies reported IOP as either means or differences (with SD or SE) and sample sizes. A random-effects model was used to pool data within each drug group. As a proxy for success rates, area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for the proportion of patients having an IOP <20 mm Hg. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five articles reporting on 158 trials were identified; 147 papers were rejected (141 were not randomized controlled trials, 5 were duplicates, and 1 had nonextractable data), leaving 9 trials from 8 articles. A total of 2152 patients were included in the meta-analysis: 597 received latanoprost, 571 received brimonidine, and the remainder received timolol or betaxolol. Baseline IOPs were similar in patients randomized to latanoprost or brimonidine (25.3 and 24.6 mm Hg, respectively). At 3 months, latanoprost and brimonidine reduced IOP by 8.4 and 6.5 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.004 latanoprost vs brimonidine), and at 6 months by 8.0 and 6.2 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.045). AUC was 0.834 and 0.675 at 3 months for latanoprost and brimonidine, respectively, and 0.817 and 0.715 at 6 months, respectively (both, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This indirect comparison of data from the available randomized clinical trials showed latanoprost to be statistically superior to brimonidine in reducing IOP in adults with primary open-angle glaucoma. Additional long-term, head-to-head comparisons of the efficacy, safety, and cost of latanoprost and brimonidine are needed to support and supplement these findings.

Are the new SSRIs safe for pregnant women?

QUESTION: More and more of my female patients are switching to the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Are they safe during pregnancy? ANSWER: Our data suggest these drugs do not increase the malformation rate, but there are no data on neurodevelopment. Because such data do exist on fluoxetine and tricyclic antidepressants, those drugs should be considered first.

Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a prospective controlled multicenter study.

CONTEXT: Although a large number of women of reproductive age use new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and half of all pregnancies are unplanned, no data exist on the safety of these agents for the human fetus. OBJECTIVE: To assess fetal safety and risk of fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, controlled cohort study. SETTING: Nine Teratology Information Service centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: All women who were counseled during pregnancy following exposure to a new SSRI and followed up by the participating centers. Controls were randomly selected from women counseled after exposure to nonteratogenic agents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of major congenital malformations. RESULTS: A total of 267 women exposed to an SSRI and 267 controls were studied. Exposure to SSRIs was not associated with either increased risk for major malformations (9/222 live births [4.1%] vs 9/235 live births [3.8%] in the controls, relative risk, 1.06, 95% confidence interval, 0.43-2.62) or higher rates of miscarriage, stillbirth, or prematurity. Mean (SD) birth weights among SSRI users (3439 [505] g) were similar to the controls (3445 [610] g) as were the gestational ages (39.4 [1.7] weeks vs 39.4 [1.9] weeks). CONCLUSION: The new SSRIs, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline, do not appear to increase the teratogenic risk when used in their recommended doses.