Human Responses to 5 Heated Hypothermia Wrap Systems in a Cold Environment.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the effectiveness of 5 heated hypothermia wrap systems. METHODS: Physiologic and subjective responses were determined in 5 normothermic subjects (1 female) for 5 heated hypothermia wraps (with vapor barrier and chemical heat sources) during 60 min of exposure to a temperature of -22°C. The 5 systems were 1) user-assembled; 2) Doctor Down Rescue Wrap; 3) hypothermia prevention and management kit (HPMK); 4) MARSARS Hypothermia Stabilizer Bag; and 5) Wiggy's Victims Casualty Hypothermia Bag. Core and skin temperature, metabolic heat production, skin heat loss, and body net heat gain were determined. Subjective responses were also evaluated for whole body cold discomfort, overall shivering rating, overall temperature rating, and preferential ranking. RESULTS: The Doctor Down and user-assembled systems were generally more effective, with higher skin temperatures and lower metabolic heat production; they allowed less heat loss, resulting in higher net heat gain (P<0.05). HPMK had the lowest skin temperature and highest shivering heat production and scored worse than the other 4 systems for the "whole body cold discomfort" and "overall temperature" ratings (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The user-assembled and Doctor Down systems were most effective, and subjects were coldest with the HPMK system. However, it is likely that any of the tested systems would be viable options for wilderness responders, and the choice would depend on considerations of cost; volume, as it relates to available space; and weight, as it relates to ability to carry or transport the system to the patient.

Efficacy of Head and Torso Rewarming Using a Human Model for Severe Hypothermia.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the rewarming effectiveness of a similar amount of heat (from a charcoal heater) applied to either the head or torso in a human model for severe hypothermia in which shivering is pharmacologically inhibited in mildly hypothermic subjects. METHODS: Six male subjects were cooled on 3 different occasions, each in 8°C water for 60 min, or to a lowest core temperature of 35°C. Shivering was inhibited by intravenous meperidine (1.5 mg·kg-1), administered during the last 10 min of the cold-water immersion. Subjects then exited from the cold water, were dried, and were placed in a 3-season sleeping bag for 120 min in one of the following conditions: spontaneous rewarming only, charcoal heater on the head, or charcoal heater on the torso. Supplemental meperidine (to a maximum cumulative dose of 3.3 mg·kg-1) was administered as required during rewarming to suppress shivering. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the postcooling afterdrop amount or core rewarming rates among the 3 conditions (0.8°C·h-1). During the last 30 min of rewarming the net heat gain was significantly higher in the head (85.8±25.3 W) and torso (81.5±6.3 W) conditions compared with the spontaneous condition (56.9±12 W) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, head and torso warming had the same core rewarming rates when shivering was pharmacologically inhibited in mildly hypothermic subjects. Therefore, in nonshivering cold subjects, head warming is a viable alternative if torso warming is contraindicated (eg, when performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation or working on open chest wounds).