Brief Report: Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Coformulated Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) in Virologically Suppressed Women.

BACKGROUND: The integrase inhibitor regimen [elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)] demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with a protease inhibitor regimen [ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV + RTV) and FTC/TDF] in 575 treatment-naive women at week 48. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to a TAF-based, single-tablet regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, FTC, and tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) versus remaining on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF. METHODS: After completing the initial randomized, blinded phase, virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) women on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF were rerandomized (3:1) to receive open-label E/C/F/TAF versus remaining on their current regimen. The primary end point was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 48 (U.S. FDA snapshot algorithm), with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 12%. Safety [adverse events (AEs)] and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 575 women originally randomized and treated in the blinded phase, 159 were rerandomized to switch to E/C/F/TAF and 53 to remain on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF. At week 48, virologic suppression was maintained in 150 (94%) of women on E/C/F/TAF and 46 (87%) on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF [difference 7.5% (95% confidence interval -1.2% to 19.4%)], demonstrating noninferiority of E/C/F/TAF to ATV + RTV and FTC/TDF. Incidence of AEs was similar between groups; study drug-related AEs were more common with E/C/F/TAF (11% versus 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to E/C/F/TAF was noninferior to continuing ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF in maintaining virologic suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks.

Week 48 resistance analysis of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF versus Atazanavir + Ritonavir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in HIV-1 infected women (WAVES study GS-US-236-0128).

Background Women and those with non-B subtype HIV-1 are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. WAVES (GS-US-236-0128) was a double-blind phase 3b study among treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected women that demonstrated that elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; N = 289) was superior to atazanavir + ritonavir + FTC/TDF (ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF; N = 286) for HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by FDA snapshot analysis at week 48. Here, we describe resistance development through week 48 in women with virologic failure and determine the impact of pre-existing mutations and HIV-1 subtype on viral suppression. Methods Genotypic analyses (population and deep sequencing) and phenotypic analyses of HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN) were performed. The resistance analysis population (participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at confirmed virologic failure, at discontinuation ≥ week 8, or at week 48) had genotypic and phenotypic analyses at failure and baseline. Results The proportion of women qualifying for resistance analyses was similar between treatment groups (6.2% EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; 7.3% ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF). Emergent resistance was rare (0% EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; 1% ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF - 3 with M184V/I in RT). Deep sequencing of HIV-1 did not detect additional resistance development. Pre-existing mutations did not lead to virologic failure; most with the polymorphic primary IN substitution T97A (92%), or with substitutions in RT (i.e. A62V, V90I, K103N, or E138A/G/K/Q; 68-82%) demonstrated virologic suppression at week 48, with no resistance development except for one patient with M184V and pre-existing K103N in the ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF group. Most participants (74%) had non-B HIV-1, and subtype did not affect outcome. Conclusions Emergent resistance to study drugs was rare in this study of women, with no resistance observed among EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF-treated participants, despite a high proportion of participants with natural or transmitted viral mutations and non-B HIV-1 subtypes.

Commonly Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations in Reverse-Transcriptase and Protease in Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Patients and Response to Regimens Containing Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate or Tenofovir Alafenamide.

Background: The presence of transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDRMs) in antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naive patients can adversely affect the outcome of ART. Methods: Resistance testing was conducted in 6704 ART-naive subjects predominantly from the United States and Europe in 9 clinical studies conducted by Gilead Sciences from 2000 to 2013. Results: The presence of TDRMs increased during this period (from 5.2% to 11.4%), primarily driven by an increase in nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase (RT) inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance mutations (from 0.3% to 7.1%), particularly K103N/S (increase from 0.3% to 5.3%). Nucleoside/nucleotide RT inhibitor mutations were found in 3.1% of patients. Only 1 patient had K65R (0.01%) and 7 had M184V/I (0.1%), despite high use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine, and lamivudine and potential transmission of resistance to these drugs. At least 1 thymidine-analogue mutations was present in 2.7% of patients with 0.07% harboring T215Y/F and 2.7% harboring T215 revertant mutations (T215rev). Patients with the combination of M41L + L210W + T215rev showed full human immunodeficiency virus RNA suppression while receiving a TDF- or tenofovir alafenamide-containing regimen. Conclusions: There was an overall increase of TDRMs among patients enrolling in clinical trials from 2000 through 2013, driven primarily by an increase in NNRTI resistance. However, the presence of common TDRMs, including thymidine-analogue mutations/T215rev, showed no impact on response to TDF- or tenofovir alafenamide-containing regimens.

Viral blips were infrequent in treatment-naive adults treated with rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF or efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF through 96 weeks.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of transient episodes of HIV viraemia (viral blips) on virological failure and resistance development is not fully understood. Here we investigated the blip frequency and virological outcomes of HIV-1-infected subjects experiencing viral blips among treatment-naive subjects initiating therapy on rilpivirine (RPV)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF through 96 weeks of treatment. METHODS: Subjects treated with at least one dose of study drug and with at least one post-baseline HIV-1 RNA value were included in this analysis. All on-drug HIV-1 RNA data points and FDA snapshot outcome data through week 96 were utilized. A viral blip was defined as after achieving confirmed suppression (two consecutive HIV-1 RNA values <50 copies/ml), any HIV-1 RNA value ≥50 copies/ml preceded and followed by HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml. RESULTS: Of the 717 subjects with confirmed suppression, 67 (9.3%) experienced ≥1 blip through week 96 with similar blip frequencies occurring in both treatment arms (10.7% RPV/FTC/TDF versus 8.0% EFV/FTC/TDF; P=0.25). A significantly higher proportion of subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA >100,000 copies/ml experienced blips compared to subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤100,000 copies/ml and this was observed in both arms. Of 72 total blip events, 61 (85%) were low-level (50-199 copies/ml). Overall, among subjects with blips, 79% were virological successes at week 96, similar to those subjects without blips (83%; P=0.50). More subjects with blips ≥200 copies/ml experienced virological failure compared to subjects with blips <200 copies/ml (36.4% versus 7.1%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Viral blips were infrequent and similar among subjects treated with RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF. Most blips were low-level and most subjects with blips remained virologically suppressed through week 96 without experiencing virological failure.

Clinical Outcomes of Virologically-Suppressed Patients with Pre-existing HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations Switching to Rilpivirine/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in the SPIRIT Study.

OBJECTIVES: Antiretroviral regimen switching may be considered for HIV-1-infected, virologically-suppressed patients to enable treatment simplification or improve tolerability, but should be guided by knowledge of pre-existing drug resistance. The current study examined the impact of pre-existing drug resistance mutations on virologic outcomes among virologically-suppressed patients switching to Rilpivirine (RPV)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). METHODS: SPIRIT was a phase 3b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching to RPV/FTC/TDF in virologically-suppressed HIV-1-infected patients. Pre-existing drug resistance at baseline was determined by proviral DNA genotyping for 51 RPV/FTC/TDF-treated patients with known mutations by historical RNA genotype and matched controls and compared with clinical outcome at Week 48. RESULTS: Drug resistance mutations in protease or reverse transcriptase were detected in 62.7% of patients by historical RNA genotype and in 68.6% by proviral DNA genotyping at baseline. Proviral DNA sequencing detected 89% of occurrences of NRTI and NNRTI resistance-associated mutations reported by historical genotype. Mutations potentially affecting RPV activity, including E138A/G/K/Q, Y181C, and H221Y, were detected in isolates from 11 patients by one or both assays. None of the patients with single mutants had virologic failure through Week 48. One patient with pre-existing Y181Y/C and M184I by proviral DNA genotyping experienced virologic failure. Nineteen patients with K103N present by historical genotype were confirmed by proviral DNA sequencing and 18/19 remained virologically-suppressed. DISCUSSION: Virologic success rates were high among virologically-suppressed patients with pre-existing NRTI and NNRTI resistance-associated mutations who switched to RPV/FTC/TDF in the SPIRIT study. While plasma RNA genotyping remains preferred, proviral DNA genotyping may provide additional value in virologically-suppressed patients for whom historical resistance data are unavailable.

Analysis of early resistance development at the first failure timepoint in elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated patients.

OBJECTIVES: The patterns of emergent HIV-1 drug resistance in patients failing a single-tablet regimen consisting of elvitegravir, boosted by cobicistat, plus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) include mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (IN). The order of development of mutations at early virological failure has not been described. The aim of this study was to determine the first resistance mutations to emerge during virological failure on EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Population sequencing was conducted at the first virological failure timepoint with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL for each of the 18 patients with emergent resistance in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF arms of two randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 studies of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF through Week 144. RESULTS: At first failure compared with confirmed virological failure, 4 of the 18 patients had no detectable resistance mutation in their virus and only 51% of the RT and IN mutations were detected overall. M184V/I in RT was the first mutation to appear in many cases (n = 6) and was then followed by additional mutations in RT and IN. No case with development of resistance to the IN strand-transfer inhibitor prior to the development of M184V/I was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of first failure found fewer patients with emergent resistance and fewer resistance mutations than the standard analysis at the later confirmation of virological failure. The early detection of resistance may preserve later treatment options.

96-week resistance analyses of the STaR study: rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected subjects.

BACKGROUND: STaR (GS-US-264-0110) was a 96-week phase 3b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two single-tablet regimens, rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (RPV/FTC/TDF) and efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF) in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected subjects. METHODS: Genotypic analyses (population sequencing) of HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were performed at screening; subjects with pre-existing resistance to study drugs were excluded. The protocol-defined resistance analysis population had genotypic/phenotypic analyses at failure and baseline for PR and RT. RESULTS: Through week 96, the resistance analysis population included 24/394 subjects (6.1%) receiving RPV/FTC/TDF and 9/392 subjects (2.3%) receiving EFV/FTC/TDF. In the RPV/FTC/TDF arm, HIV-1 isolates from 21/394 subjects (5.3%) developed non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and/or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations and 20/21 isolates had both NNRTI and NRTI genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance. In the EFV/FTC/TDF arm, isolates from 4/392 subjects (1.0%) developed NNRTI and/or NRTI resistance mutations. Resistance development after week 48 was infrequent (1.0% RPV/FTC/TDF; 0.3% EFV/FTC/TDF). When stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤ or >100 000 copies/ml, 9/260 (3.5%) versus 12/134 (9.0%) RPV/FTC/TDF-treated subjects and 3/250 (1.2%) versus 1/142 (0.7%) EFV/FTC/TDF-treated subjects developed resistant isolates, respectively. Pre-existing NRTI- and NNRTI-associated resistance mutations (not related to study drugs) did not impact treatment response to either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance development to RPV/FTC/TDF consisted of NNRTI and NRTI mutations and was more frequent than resistance development to EFV/FTC/TDF through week 96. Emergent resistance after week 48 was infrequent in both arms. Within the RPV/FTC/TDF arm, resistance development was more frequent in subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA >100 000 copies/ml compared to baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤ 100 000 copies/ml.

Baseline antiretroviral resistance mutations and treatment-emergent resistance in HIV-1 RNA-suppressed patients switching to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or continuing on their PI-, NNRTI-, or RAL-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: Stably suppressed HIV-1-infected patients that switched to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) from regimens containing FTC/TDF plus a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI + RTV), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or raltegravir in phase 3 studies STRATEGY-PI, STRATEGY-NNRTI, and GS-US-236-0123 maintained high rates of virologic suppression through 48 weeks. In this article, resistance analyses for these studies are described. METHODS: HIV-1 historical genotypes obtained before therapy initiation were analyzed for preexisting/transmitted resistance (-R) in protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) and subtype. Patients with resistance to FTC/TDF were excluded. Viral isolates with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies per milliliter at confirmed virologic failure, discontinuation, or week 48 were analyzed for protease, RT, and integrase genotype and phenotype. RESULTS: Historical genotypes from 626/628 subjects that switched to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF indicated 25% had ≥1 primary resistance mutation in protease and/or RT. NNRTI-R was identified in 15%, NRTI-R in 8.3%, and PI-R in 3.7% of subjects. Week 48 virologic success rates (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter) were 94% for all patients treated with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, 94% with preexisting resistance, 93% with subtype B, and 96% with non-B subtypes. Altogether, 2 subjects qualified for postbaseline resistance analyses. Neither had emergent resistance, and both resuppressed to HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter with no change in therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Switching antiretroviral regimens to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF in HIV-1 RNA-suppressed FTC/TDF-sensitive patients resulted in maintained virologic suppression through 48 weeks. Similar virologic success rates were achieved irrespective of the presence of preexisting resistance mutations or subtype. The lack of emergent resistance through 48 weeks supports utility of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF for treatment-experienced patients seeking regimen modification or simplification.

Week 144 resistance analysis of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naive patients.

BACKGROUND: Here, the baseline and emergent resistance to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) versus efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive adults through 144 weeks from the randomized, ongoing, Phase III study GS-US-236-0102 is described. METHODS: HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were sequenced at screening; patients with HIV-1 resistant to EFV, FTC or TDF were excluded. Genotypic/phenotypic analyses were performed at virological failure confirmation and baseline for PR, RT and integrase (IN) for patients with virological failure and for patients with HIV-1 RNA≥400 copies/ml at weeks 48, 96, 144 or early study drug discontinuation. Retrospective, baseline, IN genotyping was conducted for EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF patients. RESULTS: In the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group through week 144, HIV-1 from 10 patients (2.9%; 10/348 treated patients) developed primary IN strand transfer inhibitor (n=9) and/or nucleoside RT inhibitor resistance substitutions (n=10). The emergence of resistance decreased over time with 8, 2 and 0 patients developing HIV-1 resistance through week 48, post-week 48-96 and post-week 96-144, respectively. Emergent substitutions were E92Q (n=7), N155H (n=3), Q148R (n=1) and T66I (n=1) in IN, and M184V/I (n=10) and K65R (n=4) in RT. All 10 isolates had reduced susceptibility to EVG, FTC or TDF. Virus with EVG phenotypic resistance had cross-resistance to raltegravir. In the EFV/FTC/TDF group, virus from 14 patients (4.0%; 14/352 treated patients; 4 during weeks 96-144) developed a resistance substitution to EFV (n=14; K103N: n=13), FTC (M184V/I: n=4) or TDF (K65R: n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance development to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was infrequent through 144 weeks of therapy and decreased over time, consistent with durable efficacy.

Week 144 resistance analysis of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus atazanavir+ritonavir+emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naïve patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe baseline and emergent HIV-1 resistance to elvitegravir/ cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF) in HIV-1-infected, treatment-naïve subjects through 144 weeks. METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were sequenced at screening. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses were performed at virologic failure confirmation and retrospectively at baseline for PR, RT, and integrase (IN) for patients with virologic failure through week 144. RESULTS: In the EVG/ COBI/FTC/TDF group through week 144, HIV-1 from 8 patients (2.3%; 8/353 treated patients) developed primary IN strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (n = 6) and/or nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) resistance substitutions (n = 7). The emergence of resistance decreased after the first year, with 5 patients developing HIV-1 resistance through week 48, 1 from weeks 48-96, and 2 from weeks 96-144. Emergent substitutions were E92Q, N155H, or Q148R (n = 2 each) and T66I or T97A (n = 1 each) in IN and M184V/I (n = 7) and K65R (n = 1) in RT. All 8 isolates had reduced susceptibility to EVG, FTC, or TDF. Virus with EVG phenotypic resistance showed cross-resistance to raltegravir. In the ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF group, HIV-1 from 2 patients (0.6%; 2/355 treated patients; both at week 144) developed the resistance substitution M184V/I in RT. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance development to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was infrequent (2.3%) through 144 weeks of therapy and decreased over time, consistent with durable efficacy.

The combined anti-HIV-1 activities of emtricitabine and tenofovir plus the integrase inhibitor elvitegravir or raltegravir show high levels of synergy in vitro.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) involves combination treatment with three or more antiretroviral agents. The antiviral effects of combinations of emtricitabine (FTC) plus tenofovir (TFV) plus antiretroviral agents of all the major drug classes were investigated. Combinations of FTC and TFV with a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) (efavirenz or rilpivirine) or with a protease inhibitor (PI) (atazanavir, lopinavir, or darunavir) showed additive to synergistic anti-HIV-1 activity. FTC-TFV with an HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (elvitegravir or raltegravir) showed the strongest synergy. Anti-HIV-1 synergy suggests enhancement of individual anti-HIV-1 activities within cells that may contribute to potent treatment efficacy and open new areas of research into interactions between reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase inhibitors.

Characterization of HIV-1 drug resistance development through week 48 in antiretroviral naive subjects on rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF or efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in the STaR study (GS-US-264-0110).

BACKGROUND: The Single-Tablet Regimen (STaR) study (GS-US-264-0110) is a 96-week phase 3b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of 2 single-tablet regimens, rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (RPV/FTC/TDF), and efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF) in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected subjects. METHODS: Genotypic analyses (population sequencing) of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase were performed at screening; subjects with pre-existing resistance to study drugs were excluded. The primary protocol-defined resistance analysis population (RAP) had genotypic/phenotypic analyses at failure and baseline for protease and reverse transcriptase. RESULTS: At week 48, the primary RAP included 20/394 subjects (5.1%) receiving RPV/FTC/TDF and 7/392 subjects (1.8%) receiving EFV/FTC/TDF. In the RPV/FTC/TDF arm, isolates from 17/394 subjects (4.3%) developed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and/or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations, and 16/17 isolates had both NNRTI and NRTI resistance mutations. In the EFV/FTC/TDF arm, isolates from 3/392 subjects (0.8%) developed NNRTI and/or NRTI resistance mutations. When stratified by baseline viral load of either ≤ 100,000 or >100,000 copies/mL, 5/260 (1.9%) versus 12/134 (9.0%) RPV/FTC/TDF-treated subjects and 2/250 (0.8%) versus 1/142 (0.7%) EFV/FTC/TDF-treated subjects developed resistant isolates, respectively. The presence of pre-existing NRTI- and NNRTI-associated resistance mutations not excluded at screening (not related to study drugs) did not impact treatment response to either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects in the primary RAP, resistance development to RPV/FTC/TDF consisted of NNRTI and NRTI mutations and was more frequent than resistance development to EFV/FTC/TDF. In subjects with baseline viral load ≤ 100,000 copies/mL, resistance development was low (<2%) for both RPV/FTC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF arms and less frequent compared with subjects with baseline viral load >100,000 copies/mL, for RPV/FTC/TDF.

Dead-end complexes contribute to the synergistic inhibition of HIV-1 RT by the combination of rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir.

The single tablet regimen of the nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC), and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) rilpivirine (RPV) is approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in treatment-naïve adults. Previous studies have shown that two-drug combinations of these drugs show additive to synergistic HIV-1 antiviral activity in cell culture. In this study, two-drug combinations of tenofovir (TFV)+FTC, RPV+TFV, and RPV+FTC inhibited HIV-1 replication in cell culture with strong synergy and no evidence of antagonism. The triple drug combination of RPV+FTC+TFV displayed moderate synergy comparable to efavirenz (EFV)+FTC+TFV. The formation of dead-end complexes (DEC) of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), NRTI chain-terminated primer/template, and the next complementary nucleotide or NNRTIs was studied using gel mobility shift assays. DEC formation was seen with TFV-terminated DNA primer/template, HIV-1 RT, and FTC-triphosphate (TP) in addition to the natural nucleotide dCTP, thus stabilizing chain-termination. The NNRTI RPV also formed DEC-like complexes with TFV- and FTC-monophosphate (MP)-terminated DNA primer/templates and HIV-1 RT, and stabilized chain-termination by both NRTIs. Overall, the combinations of RPV, FTC, and TFV inhibit HIV-1 replication with moderate to strong synergy. This may be partially explained by enhanced DEC formation of NRTI chain-terminated DNA primer/template and HIV-1 RT in the presence of the other drugs in the combination, leading to more stable chain-termination and replication inhibition by NRTIs.

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase M184I mutation enhances the E138K-associated resistance to rilpivirine and decreases viral fitness.

BACKGROUND: The registrational phase III clinical trials of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor (NNRTI) rilpivirine (RPV) in combination with two nucleoside/nucleotide RT inhibitors (NRTIs) found a unique genotypic resistance pattern involving the NNRTI mutation E138K with the NRTI mutation M184I. Eighty percent of subjects used emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF); a single tablet regimen of FTC/RPV/TDF is in development. METHODS: HIV-1 with E138K and/or M184V or I mutations were constructed and phenotyped in MT-2 cells and the PhenoSense and Antivirogram assays. Viral fitness was determined using growth competitions. Molecular models of the mutants were constructed from the RT-RPV crystal structure. RESULTS: The E138K mutant showed low-level reduced susceptibility to RPV (2.4-fold), but full susceptibility to FTC and tenofovir (TFV). Viruses with M184V or M184I showed high-level resistance to FTC and full susceptibility to RPV and TFV. Addition of M184I, but not M184V, to E138K, further decreased susceptibility to RPV and maintained FTC resistance. The E138K and M184V or I single and double mutants showed decreased replication fitness compared with wild type. M184V outcompeted M184I when compared directly and in the background of E138K. E138K + M184I was less fit than either E138K or M184I alone. Removing a salt bridge between E138/K101 is implicated in resistance to RPV. CONCLUSIONS: The higher frequency of E138K and M184I among RPV + FTC/TDF virologic failures is due to reduced susceptibility of the single mutants to RPV and FTC and the enhanced resistance to RPV for the double mutant at the cost of decreased viral fitness.