Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
In Vivo ; 37(5): 2229-2236, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate possible association between adverse events of nivolumab therapy and the effectiveness of treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Focusing on serious adverse events (i.e., those of grade ≥3), we evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a set of patients from the TULUNG database of NSCLC treated with nivolumab in eight oncology centers. We evaluated OS data based upon this set. To reduce possible bias, we further evaluated a subgroup of patients treated at the University Hospital in Pilsen, where the occurrence of adverse events, PFS, and ORR were independently examined by two experienced physicians. Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. RESULTS: We observed significantly greater OS, PFS, and ORR in the group of patients experiencing adverse events upon nivolumab treatment versus in those patients without such events. Although the univariable model analyzing the data set of all patients demonstrated higher OS in patients with serious adverse events, only a nonsignificant trend was observed in the Cox multivariable model. In a subgroup of patients with PFS and ORR evaluation, we did observe significant, favorable effects for patients having had serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing severe adverse events show a tendency toward better OS, PFS, and ORR compared to patients without or having only mild adverse events with nivolumab treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Progression-Free Survival
2.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol ; 11(5): 451-458, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34726512

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Aim was to analyze demographic and tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer younger than 40 years of age (U40) compared to older subgroups (41-70 and >70 years). Methods: We analyzed data of young patients diagnosed and treated in 2011-2019 in five pneumo-oncology centers in Czechia. Standard descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used. p-Values <0.05 were considered significant. These data were compared with two control subgroups (cohort 1: 41-70 years, cohort 2: >70 years). Results: We identified 66 patients U40, 61 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-50.8% men, mean age 34.6 years, 54.1% nonsmokers, daily good performance status, and 82% in stage IV. Adenocarcinomas dominated, endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) positivity was less common than in older groups contrary to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (vs. 4.9 and 6.2 months; p = 0.006) and overall survival reached 11.7 months (vs. 22.3 and 27.3 months; p < 0.001). Young patients in stage IV and never-smokers had shorter survival than older patients. Conclusion: Patients with NSCLC U40 had significantly worse prognosis than older patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Mutation , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged
3.
Anticancer Res ; 41(11): 5549-5556, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: LUCAS is a clinical lung cancer registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT04228237), prospectively collecting data from newly diagnosed lung cancer patients in seven pneumooncology centers in the Czech Republic, since June 1, 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, percentage of morphological types, survival, percentage of driving mutations, eligibility for radical surgery, and percentage of patients who undergo radical surgery, in the non-smoking population in comparison with smokers and former smokers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The total number of patients in the registry at the time of the analysis was 2,743. Only 2,439 patients with complete records (smoking status, stage, and type of tumor) were included in this study. RESULTS: The analysis indicated that non-smokers are diagnosed at a later stage of the disease but they have a better survival rate than smokers. Fewer smokers with stage III disease who are eligible for radical surgery will undergo surgery compared to non-smokers with the same clinical stage. Driving mutations are more common in non-smokers, even after adjustment for the more frequent occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the group of non-smokers. CONCLUSION: The data from LUCAS registry are consistent with already known facts, suggesting that the LUCAS registry is a useful clinical tool.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Non-Smokers , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Ex-Smokers , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Pneumonectomy , Prospective Studies , Registries , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/diagnosis , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/mortality , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy , Smokers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 28: 100427, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284344

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of an active cellular immunotherapy (DCVAC/LuCa) and chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SLU01 was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, phase I/II trial. NSCLC patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive: DCVAC/LuCa and chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel; Group A); DCVAC/LuCa, chemotherapy, pegylated interferon-α2b, and hydroxychloroquine (Group B); or chemotherapy alone (Group C). DCVAC/LuCa was administered subcutaneously every 3-6 weeks (up to 15 doses). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). During the study, enrollment into Group B was discontinued for strategic reasons. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were randomized to Group A, 29 patients to Group B, and 38 patients to Group C. The median OS in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population was 3.7 months longer in Group A than in Group C (15.5 vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.0179; hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.91). This OS effect was consistent across subgroups of the mITT population (females, males, current smokers, former smokers, and patients with non-squamous and squamous cell histology). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade reported in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, were neutropenia (50.0%, 29.6%, and 20.6%), fatigue (40.0%, 18.5%, and 20.6%), anemia (35.0%, 44.4%, and 32.4%), paresthesia (27.5%, 25.9%, and 17.6%), and alopecia (25.0%, 29.6%, and 41.2%). CONCLUSION: DCVAC/LuCa in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel extended OS and was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Dendritic Cells/metabolism , Immunotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Carboplatin/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Young Adult
5.
Anticancer Res ; 41(5): 2597-2603, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33952489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed or paclitaxel/bevacizumab are regimens used in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We conducted a real-world study to compare the outcomes of these chemotherapeutic regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated 1,534 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC treated with platin/pemetrexed (n=1212) or platin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (n=322) in 9 cancer centres in the Czech Republic. RESULTS: The regimen containing platin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab showed significantly better overall response rate (ORR) compared to the platin/pemetrexed [40.8% vs. 32.7% (p=0.008)] in the overall population and [55.0% vs. 38.8% (p=0.002)] in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 group. There was no significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in either of these two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In our real-world data analysis, patients treated with platin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab had better overall response rate (ORR), but not PFS or OS. Thus, both treatment regimens are similarly effective. Their selection should therefore be based on the potential side effects.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Pemetrexed/administration & dosage , Pemetrexed/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival
6.
Radiol Oncol ; 54(2): 209-220, 2020 05 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32463394

ABSTRACT

Background Management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is affected by regional specificities. The present study aimed at determining diagnostic and therapeutic procedures including outcome of patients with NSCLC stage III in the real-world setting in Central European countries to define areas for improvements. Patients and methods This multicentre, prospective and non-interventional study collected data of patients with NSCLC stage III in a web-based registry and analysed them centrally. Results Between March 2014 and March 2017, patients (n=583) with the following characteristics were entered: 32% females, 7% never-smokers; ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 25%, 58%, 12% and 5%, respectively; 21% prior weight loss; 53% squamous carcinoma, 38% adenocarcinoma; 10% EGFR mutations. Staging procedures included chest X-ray (97% of patients), chest CT (96%), PET-CT (27%), brain imaging (20%), bronchoscopy (89%), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) (13%) and CT-guided biopsy (9%). Stages IIIA/IIIB were diagnosed in 55%/45% of patients, respectively. N2/N3 nodes were diagnosed in 60%/23% and pathologically confirmed in 29% of patients. Most patients (56%) were treated by combined modalities. Surgery plus chemotherapy was administered to 20%, definitive chemoradiotherapy to 34%, chemotherapy only to 26%, radiotherapy only to 12% and best supportive care (BSC) to 5% of patients. Median survival and progression-free survival times were 16.8 (15.3;18.5) and 11.2 (10.2;12.2) months, respectively. Stage IIIA, female gender, no weight loss, pathological mediastinal lymph node verification, surgery and combined modality therapy were associated with longer survival. Conclusions The real-world study demonstrated a broad heterogeneity in the management o f stage III NSCLC in Central European countries and suggested to increase the rates of PET-CT imaging, brain imaging and invasive mediastinal staging.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Bronchoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Endosonography/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Female , Genes, erbB-1 , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Non-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Anticancer Res ; 40(4): 2209-2217, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32234916

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate potential association between administration of corticosteroids, antibiotics, probiotics, proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), statins and metformin and outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 224 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers were analyzed in this national retrospective study. Survival statistics were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. RESULTS: Only corticosteroid use had a significant negative effect on the objective response rate. In the univariate analysis, there was no significant effect of the studied concomitant medications on the efficacy of nivolumab. In a subsequent multifactorial analysis, a possible positive effect of the concomitant use of NSAID at the initiation of nivolumab treatment was revealed. CONCLUSION: The results of the present retrospective exploratory analysis underscore the importance of knowing the exact type of concomitant medication, the route of administration, the dose of medication, and the region of the ongoing study. The present data indicated a significantly higher rate of progression in patients treated with corticosteroids and the possible positive effect of NSAID use at the initiation of nivolumab treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Metformin/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Proportional Hazards Models , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies
8.
Anticancer Res ; 38(12): 6771-6782, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30504389

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate potential associations between clinical and standard peripheral blood biomarkers and clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at seven comprehensive cancer care centers were analyzed in this national retrospective study. Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. RESULTS: Among clinical parameters, histology was significantly associated with progression-free survival. Univariate Cox-proportional hazards model indicated prognostic and predictive role of a panel of laboratory parameters reflecting chronic inflammatory pattern (elevated neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein and decrease in hemoglobin and albumin). Higher serum calcium concentration was also associated with nivolumab treatment effect. CONCLUSION: Tumor histology was the only clinical parameter predicting the outcome of nivolumab treatment. Among the laboratory parameters, our analysis identified a laboratory panel reflecting chronic inflammation as a potential predictive marker of nivolumab treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Inflammation/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Inflammation/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
9.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 34(9): 1687-1694, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912578

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a standard of care in patients with stages IIA, IIB, and IIIA after complete tumor resection. Utilization and outcome of AC in routine practice is described in a few studies, with non-conclusive results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent curative-intent surgery. Data of AC uptake in stages IB (tumor of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, and IIIA, and reasons of AC omission were evaluated according to medical records. Mortality risk among patients treated with surgery (only) and different types of AC in routine practice was compared. RESULTS: AC was applied to 79% of patients with stages IB (tumor of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, and IIIA, and was associated with an improved median of overall survival (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.44-1.06). Significantly longer survival was achieved in the sub-group treated with platinum and oral vinorelbine (HR = 0.575, 95% CI = 0.339-0.974), and the longest survival was among patients treated with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin (HR = 0.371, 95% CI = 0.168-0.820). CONCLUSIONS: AC utilization should be based on co-operation between surgeons, pneumo-oncologists, and patients. Rational use of AC offers better survival in routine practice.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms , Pneumonectomy , Vinorelbine/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pneumonectomy/methods , Pneumonectomy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
10.
Tumour Biol ; 39(2): 1010428317691186, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218046

ABSTRACT

Pemetrexed is an antifolate cytostatic agent targeting several folate-dependent enzymatic pathways, widely used in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic stage non-small cell lung cancer. Aside from the non-squamous histology, there is still no available molecular biomarker predicting treatment efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of thyroid transcription factor 1 expression with outcome of a large cohort of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed. We retrospectively analysed clinical data of 463 patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (IIIB or IV) treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was assessed using indirect immunohistochemical detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue at the time of diagnosis. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was detected in the tumour tissue from 76.0% of patients, and tumours from 24.0% of patients were thyroid transcription factor 1 negative. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with thyroid transcription factor 1 positive tumours were 4.8 and 11.8 months compared to 2.8 and 8.3 months for those with thyroid transcription factor 1 negative tumours (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model revealed that thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.57, p < 0.001) and also with overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.73, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the results of the conducted retrospective study suggest that the thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced-stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/biosynthesis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pemetrexed/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Transcription Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL