Pathological factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 113 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for cervical cancer. The SLNs were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) when the hematoxylin-eosin stain was negative. RESULTS: The overall bilateral detection rate was 81.5%, with a median of two SLNs resected. The study ultimately included 92 patients with SLNs that were mapped who had also undergone systematic pelvic lymph node dissection. Thirteen (14.1%) patients had positive SLNs, with a median of one positive SLN. Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, one (1.1%) had isolated tumor cells (ITC), seven (7.6%) had micrometastases, and five (5.4%) had macrometastases. Notably, 46.1% (6/13) had lymph node metastases detected only after IHC. Five (38.5%) cases had positive non-SLNs, with a median count of one positive lymph node. Parametrial invasion was the only risk factor for positive non-SLN (p = .045). Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, non-SLN involvement was present in the only case with ITC (1/1), 42.9% (3/7) of cases with micrometastases, and in 20% (1/5) with macrometastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that parametrial invasion correlates with the risk of non-SLN metastasis in cervical cancer.

Cox-2, EGFR, and ERBB-2 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer using an automated imaging system.

We hypothesized that the activation of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and ErbB-2 signaling is required for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions to progress to cervical cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed in 179 patients with Stage I squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 233 patients with CIN (112 CIN I, 47 CIN II, and 74 CIN III). COX-2, EGFR, and ErbB-2 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using the ACIS III automated imaging system. The mean expression of COX-2, EGFR, and ErbB-2 was compared between the various stages of CIN and SCC. COX-2 mean expression was predominantly cytoplasmic, increasing significantly from CIN I to CIN II, CIN III, and SCC (P<0.001). EGFR mean expression also rose significantly during tumor progression from CIN I to SCC (P=0.001). CIN I samples were negative for ErbB-2 expression. CIN II, CIN III, and SCC were considered positive for ErbB-2 expression in 2.2%, 14%, and 16.2% of cases, respectively. There was also a statistically significant correlation between increase of ErbB-2 positivity from CIN to SCC. We conclude that COX-2, EGFR, and ErbB-2 expression increase significantly during the progression of CIN to cancer.