Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Arerugi ; 73(3): 279-289, 2024.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We previously reported that pharmacists working in pharmacies don't have enough knowledge and enough experience teaching anaphylaxis (An) and EpiPen use. We administered a questionnaire survey to pharmacists with experience handling EpiPen prescriptions. We investigated the relationship between the questionnaire results and the factors in the pharmacists' background regarding the explanation and guidance to patients. RESULTS: The percentage of pharmacists working in pharmacies who provided guidance using visual information and demonstrations was insufficient. Moreover, this figure decreased after the second guidance session. Objective confirmation of patient understanding was also insufficient. The results indicated that self-examination and participation in drug information sessions were important background factors for pharmacists who provided detailed guidance to patients. DISCUSSION: For appropriate long-term management of their condition, An patients must master the EpiPen technique. Pharmacists' guidance plays a critical role in this regard. A support system should be established for proper instruction of pharmacy patients by improving pharmacists' self-education and other educational opportunities.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Patient Education as Topic , Pharmacists , Humans , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged
2.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 12(2)2024 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668089

ABSTRACT

With the recent shift in community pharmacist services toward in-person services and the growing need for centralized and continuous medication management/monitoring, pharmacist-patient information sharing is crucial. This study investigated the pharmacist-patient gap in the recognition of pharmacists' behaviors regarding information sharing and assessed the potential impact of such recognition on patient trust and willingness to self-disclose. This cross-sectional study included 600 patients (aged 21-85 years) using pharmacy services (surveyed online in December 2020) and 591 community pharmacists with ≥1 year of experience (surveyed from September to November 2021). Both groups responded to items on the recognition of pharmacists' behaviors regarding information sharing. There were patient-specific items on trust in community pharmacists and willingness to self-disclose. For all items on the recognition of pharmacists' behaviors, patients' scores were significantly lower (4-5) than pharmacists' own scores (≥5), revealing a notable perception gap. Patients' recognition had a positive, direct effect on trust and willingness, and trust had a positive, direct effect on willingness. Patients' recognition and trust positively influenced their willingness to self-disclose. Pharmacist communication with clear intent is important to bridge the gaps in pharmacist-patient recognition and foster effective patient-pharmacist relationships.

3.
Arerugi ; 72(5): 453-462, 2023.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anaphylactic shock is a serious and life-threatening condition, and affected patients should be quickly and effectively treated with an EpiPen. Although the correct use of an EpiPen is greatly affected by a user's proficiency level and the instructions accompanying the EpiPen, there has been almost no investigation into the knowledge of the EpiPen and the actual situation of the accompanying instructions for use. Therefore, we conducted this nationwide survey to elucidate these issues. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted among pharmacists registered as members of the system of a research company outside the university and working at pharmacies with experience in handling EpiPen prescriptions. RESULTS: Many of the pharmacists surveyed knew that the EpiPen is the first-line treatment for anaphylactic shock. However, they did not have sufficient knowledge of administration routes and candidates for second-line treatment. Both their occasions and experiences of dealing of EpiPen were found to be low. CONSIDERATION: It is desirable to learn at conferences regarding allergology/clinical allergy and seminars for medical professionals including pharmacists in order to acquire the skills and knowledge to consult with patients with allergic diseases, including action plans presented by doctors in preparation for recurrence of anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Pharmacies , Humans , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Pharmacists , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci ; 13: 4-11, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37859848

ABSTRACT

Otsubo H, Kishimoto K, Hirano I, Nakano H, Itaya K, Kumaki R, Osumi H. Relationship between cognitive function affecting motor Functional Independence Measure and hypnotics. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2022; 13: 4-11. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between cognitive dysfunction affecting motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and hypnotics. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 509 patients aged ≥ 65 years who were discharged from a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Results: Multiple regression analysis was performed with motor FIM efficiency and motor FIM effectiveness (motor FIM-e) as independent variables and the presence or absence of cognitive dysfunction as the dependent variable. The use of hypnotics in patients with cognitive dysfunction showed a positive relationship with motor FIM efficiency (ß = 0.147, P = 0.019) and motor FIM-e (ß = 0.141, P = 0.026). Multiple regression analyses were performed after further classifying hypnotics by therapeutic class into hypnotics with new mechanisms, non-benzodiazepine (BZ) hypnotics, and BZ hypnotics. Non-BZ hypnotics (ß = 0.141, P = 0.021) showed a positive relationship with motor FIM efficiency. Non-BZ hypnotics (ß = 0.158, P = 0.009) and BZ hypnotics (ß = 0.178, P = 0.003) showed a positive relationship with motor FIM-e, whereas hypnotics with new mechanisms of action did not. In contrast, none of the three combinations of hypnotics showed any significant relationship with either motor FIM efficiency or motor FIM-e in patients without cognitive dysfunction. Conclusion: The results suggested that the use of hypnotics in patients with cognitive dysfunction increases motor FIM efficiency and motor FIM-e.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...