Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(10): e47682, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38021761

ABSTRACT

Ameloblastoma is one of the most prevalent but enigmatic benign odontogenic tumors of the jaw, accounting for approximately 10% of all maxillary and mandibular tumors. This neoplasia is distinguished by exhibiting several clinical and histological variants along with several mutations that affect its behavior. The ameloblastoma treatment plan is determined by the tumor's size, anatomical location, histologic variant, and anatomical involvement. On chromosome 7, there is a proto-oncogene called BRAF. When BRAF is mutated, it becomes an oncogene and continuously produces proteins like MEK and ERK, members of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). In the signaling pathway, these proteins activate transcription factor inside the nucleus that helps in cell division and growth. Numerous neoplasms have been linked to more than 40 BRAF mutations. The most common one is BRAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E, whose treatment has been linked to a positive outcome. BRAF inhibitors like vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and sorafenib have shown excellent results, especially in metastatic ameloblastoma. BRAF, particularly in the case of metastatic ameloblastoma, inhibitors such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and sorafenib, has demonstrated outstanding results. Targeted therapies have been employed as adjuvant therapies to enhance cosmetic outcomes, even though no reports of serial cases demonstrate their effectiveness in ameloblastomas. In the treatment of ameloblastomas, the identification of BRAF V600E and additional mutations as the prime targeted therapies has proven to be a significant breakthrough where surgical treatment was contraindicated. In this article, we review the presence of BRAF V600E mutations, their inhibitors, and targeted therapies in ameloblastoma.

2.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 18(2): 100-106, 2017 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28174361

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The most commonly impacted tooth in the oral cavity is the mandibular third molar. Various etiologic factors have been suggested for impacted mandibular third molars. The pattern and prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars vary with different population and region. This study throws light on the prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molars in Eritrea, East Africa. This is the first reported study regarding the same from Eritrea. AIM: To assess the prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibu-lar third molars in the population of Eritrea, East Africa by conducting a retrospective study from January 2009 to January 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Orotta School of Medicine and Dental Medicine and the Orotta Referral Medical and Surgical Hospital, Asmara, Eritrea. A total of 1,813 clinical and radiographic records [orthopantomograms] were assessed and 276 cases were selected for the study as per the inclusion criteria. They were evaluated for the frequency among the various age groups, gender and region along with the sides affected, angulation and level of impaction. The presence of systemic conditions and associated pathologies was also assessed according to the type of impaction. RESULTS: The average age of these patients in the study was found to be 30 years, with the 20 to 30 years age group being the most affected (67.4%). Females (53.3%) were affected more than the males (46.7%). People from the Asmara region showed significantly more prevalence (79.7%) than the adjoining areas (20.3%). Mesioangular impaction was the most common angulation with a definite relationship to the age groups (p = 0.032). The level of impaction had no significant relationship to the age groups, gender, or region, although class I position A was found to be the most common type. Mesioangular class I position A impac-tion showed an apparent relationship with underlying systemic conditions, but it was statistically insignificant. Mesioangular impaction was found to be associated with the most number of pathologies (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of mandibular impaction was less in Eritrea (15.2%) compared with other populations. This study provides useful baseline data for the prevalence and pattern of mandibular impaction in the Eritrean population. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study throws light on the pattern, type, and frequency of mandibular impacted teeth as per age, sex, and region among the population of Eritrea.


Subject(s)
Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Molar, Third/diagnostic imaging , Tooth, Impacted/diagnostic imaging , Tooth, Impacted/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Eritrea/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/pathology , Molar, Third/pathology , Prevalence , Radiography, Panoramic/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Tooth, Impacted/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...