ABSTRACT
Background Infertility and problems of impaired fecundity have been a concern through the ages and are also considerable clinical problems today, affecting many couples worldwide. Most infertility cases are primarily attributed to male factors, which play a significant role. Additionally, a substantial number of these patients exhibit suboptimal sperm parameters. The study is mainly designed for individual intervention and outcome. We aim to evaluate the demographics, etiology, utilization of treatments, and outcomes of males undergoing infertility treatment. Methodology We retrospectively enrolled infertile couples from January 2021 to March 2023, covering the past two years. All patients were evaluated and investigated per the study protocol to identify the cause of infertility. Results Two thousand three hundred forty-eight males were enrolled in the study, of whom 1,484 (63%) were found to have a standard semen analysis. A total of 868 (37%) had abnormal semen parameters. Two hundred and seventy-two (12%) patients completed the evaluation. All parameters, except for hypospermia, displayed lower percentages of motility compared to normozospermia. All semen parameters, except for hypospermia, showed a significantly lower normal morphology in comparison to normozospermia. This reduction increased by 10% for each year of age increment. Conclusions The study concluded by following a protocol for evaluating male patients. If an abnormal sperm parameter is identified before considering intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), it is recommended to conduct at least karyotyping and microdeletion analysis on the Y-chromosome's q arm.
ABSTRACT
Exact breakpoint determination by oligonucleotide array-CGH has improved the analysis of genotype-phenotype correlations in cases with chromosome aberrations allowing a more accurate definition of relevant genes, particularly their isolated or combined impact on the phenotype in an unbalanced state. Chromosomal imbalances have been identified as one of the major causes of mental retardation and/or malformation syndromes and they are observed in ~2-5% of the cases. Here we report a female child born to non-consanguineous parents and having multiple congenital anomalies such as atrial septal defect and multiple ventricular septal defects, convergent strabismus, micropthalmia, seizures and mental retardation, with her head circumference and stature normal for her age. Cytogenetic study suggested 46,XX,add(8)(p23). Further analysis by array-CGH using 44K oligonucleotide probe confirmed deletion on 8p23.3p23.1 of 7.1 Mb and duplication involving 15q23q26.3 of 30 Mb size leading to 46,XX,der(8)t(8;15)(p23.3;q23)pat.arr 8p23.3p23.1(191,530-7,303,237)x1,15q23q26.3(72,338,961-102,35,195)x3. The unique phenotypic presentation in our case may have resulted from either loss or gain of a series of contiguous genes which may have resulted in a direct phenotypic effect and/or caused a genetic regulatory disturbance. Double segmental aberrations may have conferred phenotypic variability, as in our case, making it difficult to predict the characteristics that evolved as a result of the global gene imbalance, caused by the concomitant deletion and duplication.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss is a common occurrence and a matter of concern for couples planning the pregnancy. Chromosomal abnormalities, mainly balanced rearrangements, are common in couples with repeated miscarriages. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contribution of chromosomal anomalies causing repeated spontaneous miscarriages and provide detailed characterization of a few structurally altered chromosomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cytogenetic study was carried out on 4859 individuals having a history of recurrent miscarriages. The cases were analyzed using G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization wherever necessary. RESULTS: Chromosomal rearrangements were found in 170 individuals (3.5%). Translocations were seen in 72 (42.35%) cases. Of these, reciprocal translocations constituted 42 (24.70%) cases while Robertsonian translocations were detected in 30 (17.64%) cases. 7 (4.11%) cases were mosaic, 8 (4.70%) had small supernumerary marker chromosomes and 1 (0.6%) had an interstitial microdeletion. Nearly, 78 (1.61%) cases with heteromorphic variants were seen of which inversion of Y chromosome (57.70%) and chromosome 9 pericentromeric variants (32.05%) were predominantly involved. CONCLUSIONS: Chromosomal analysis is an important etiological investigation in couples with repeated miscarriages. Characterization of variants/marker chromosome enable calculation of a more precise recurrent risk in a subsequent pregnancy thereby facilitating genetic counseling and deciding further reproductive options.
