ABSTRACT
AIM: We aimed to investigate the possibility of an association between a stem-like hallmark and radiotherapeutic sensitivity in human cervical carcinoma cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Side-population (SP) cells and non-SP (NSP) cells in HeLa cells were isolated using flow cytometry and Hoechst 33342 efflux. We performed Western blot analysis to evaluate the expression of stem cell markers (CXCR4, Oct3/4, CD133, and SOX2) and apoptosis markers after irradiation. In addition, SP and NSP cells were injected into nude mice and we assessed subcutaneous tumor formation. To examine tolerance of irradiation, colony formation and apoptosis change were confirmed in the SP and NSP cells. RESULTS: SP cells showed a higher expression of CXCR4, Oct3/4, CD133, and SOX2 than NSP cells. The colony size of SP cells cultured on non-coated dishes was larger than that of NSP cells, and NSP cells were easily induced to undergo apoptosis. SP cells tended to form spheroids and showed a higher level of tumorigenicity compared with NSP cells. In addition, nude mice inoculated with SP cells showed greater tumor growth compared with NSP cells. SP cells showed a higher tumorigenicity and lower apoptotic potential, leading to enhanced radiotolerance. CONCLUSION: Tumor SP cells showed higher-level stem-cell-like characters and radioresistance than NSP cells. SP cells may be useful for new therapeutic approaches for radiation-resistant cervical cancer.
Subject(s)
Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Radiation Tolerance , Side-Population Cells/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Animals , Apoptosis/radiation effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition , Female , Hepatocyte Growth Factor/physiology , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Neoplastic Stem Cells/radiation effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/physiology , Side-Population Cells/radiation effects , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of Sonazoid(®)-enhanced ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in comparison with Doppler US. METHODS: Twenty-five ovarian tumor patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery were recruited for this study. The day before the operation, each patient was evaluated with color and power Doppler and baseline US during intravenous infusion of Sonazoid. Each lesion was classified as "benign" or "malignant" on the basis of specific criteria for a Doppler signal or Sonazoid-enhanced pattern. The reference standard was the histology of surgically removed adnexal tumors. RESULTS: Twenty patients were diagnosed with malignant tumors (invasive cancer, n = 15; metastatic cancer, n = 1; borderline tumor, n = 4), and the remaining five were diagnosed with benign tumors. Sonazoid-enhanced US correctly depicted the presence or absence of intratumoral blood flow in all patients with an accuracy of 92 %. Color Doppler ultrasound depicted the malignancies with an accuracy of 64 %, and power Doppler ultrasound depicted them with an accuracy of 76 %. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that Sonazoid-enhanced US is superior to conventional color Doppler US for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors, but not to power Doppler US. The data and their interpretation in our study should be taken with some degree of caution because of the small number of subjects. Further studies involving a larger sample size would be needed to confirm these findings.
