Ethics update: lessons learned from Terri Schiavo: the importance of healthcare proxies in clinical decision-making.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss issues of privacy and personal choice in end-of-life decision-making and existing options for directing end-of-life care, and highlight important differences between living wills, advance directives and other forms of healthcare proxies. RECENT FINDINGS: The events surrounding the death of Terri Schiavo raise many ethical, legal and moral issues that warrant discussion. In that context, we examine the implications associated with family disagreement over end-of-life care, the ramifications for healthcare providers and the role played by politicians, the courts and the media in galvanizing the debate. Groups promoting a variety of causes seized the opportunity to further their own agenda by using the internet and other methods to rapidly disseminate often false information, fueling arguments over misdiagnosis of persistent vegetative state and raising false hopes for neurological recovery. SUMMARY: It is incumbent upon the medical community, political and religious leaders and the media to educate the public appropriately about options regarding end-of-life issues and to foster open discourse and encourage the execution of advance directives or healthcare proxies. Although the content of this article deals with a specific case and legal rulings pertaining to the USA, the issues and questions raised are pertinent to healthcare providers and individuals around the world.