The impact of free-radical stabilization techniques on in vivo subsurface mechanical properties in highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) for total hip arthroplasty was developed to improve wear resistance in vivo and associated complications in comparison to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. This material typically goes through various free-radical stabilization techniques by remelting, single-annealing, or sequentially annealing the polyethylene to improve in vivo oxidation and wear properties. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is evidence of subsurface microhardness changes in retrieved HXLPE liner at the rim and articular subsurface after extended in vivo time that could be associated with oxidation and its effects on mechanical properties and implant integrity. Retrieved HXLPE liners were chosen based on peak subsurface Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy oxidation values. Each was mechanically tested for subsurface microhardness at both the rim and articular surface using a validated microindentation technique. Rim testing demonstrated a decrease in mechanical integrity that corresponded to higher subsurface oxidation values regardless of the free-radical stabilization technique. At the articular surface, a decrease in mechanical integrity was observed near the surface corresponding to peak oxidation and Vicker's hardness, which decreased with increasing depths. This was found in all groups, with the exception of the single-annealed liners, which demonstrated decreased mechanical integrity trends at greater depths between 1.0 and 2.0 mm. Our results suggest that subsurface mechanical properties do change in vivo for certain implants. Though it is likely that the mechanical failures are multifactorial, we have shown that mechanical property degradation of HXLPE liners does occur with long-term in vivo exposure and should be considered a possible risk factor.

Area Available for Atrial Fibrillation to Propagate Is an Important Determinant of Recurrence After Ablation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes based on scar patterns and contiguous area available for AF wavefronts to propagate. BACKGROUND: The relevance of ablation scar pattern acting as a barrier for electrical propagation in recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent AF is unknown. METHODS: Three-month post-ablation atrial cardiac magnetic resonance was used to determine post-ablation scar. The left atrium (LA) was divided into 5 areas based on anatomical landmarks and scar patterns. The length of gaps in scar on the area boundaries was used to calculate fibrillatory areas (FAs) by adding the weighted contribution of adjacent areas. Cylindrical as well as patient-specific computational models were used to further confirm findings. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients that underwent an initial ablation for AF with 2 years of follow-up were included. The average maximum FA was 7,896 ± 1,988 mm2 in patients with recurrence (n = 40) and 6,559 ± 1,784 mm2 in patients without recurrence (n = 35) (p < 0.008). After redo ablation in 19 patients with recurrence, average maximum FA was 7,807 ± 1,392 mm2 in 9 patients with recurrence and 5,030 ± 1,765 mm2 in 10 without recurrence (p < 0.007). LA volume and total scar were not significant predictors of recurrence after the first ablation. In the cylindrical model, AF self-terminated after reducing the FAs. In the patient-specific models, simulation matched the clinical outcomes with larger FAs associated with post-ablation arrhythmia recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: This data provides mechanistic insights into AF recurrence, suggesting that post-ablation scar pattern dividing the atria into smaller regions is an important and better predictor than LA volume and total scar, with improved long-term outcomes in persistent AF.