Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 55(8): 680-688, 2022 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dementia is often accompanied by sleep disturbances, whereby the diagnostics with subjective procedures and objective methods can produce discrepant results. The frequency and clinical characteristics of patients, whose subjective sleep efficiency was unimpaired and was in contrast to an objectively conspicuous sleep efficiency in the sense of an overestimation, were investigated in a memory consultation. METHODS: On 2 consecutive days, patients underwent guideline-oriented diagnostics for dementia (including mini-mental status examination, MMSE and clinical dementia rating, CDR), supplemented by a subjective (Pittsburgh sleep quality index, PSQI) and objective (overnight actigraphy) sleep assessment. Overestimation of sleep efficiency was defined as a subjective sleep efficiency (SSE) of ≥85% with an actigraphic sleep efficiency (ASE) of <85%. RESULTS: Of 45 patients (74.4 ± 7.8 years; 26 f/19 m; CDR < 1: n = 16, CDR = 1: n = 28; diagnostic groups according to ICD-10: F0: n = 39, F3: n = 5, Z03.x: n = 1) 10 showed an overestimation of sleep efficiency, who showed a lower MMSE score and a higher proportion of patients with a dementia syndrome (CDR = 1) when compared with the other three groups of SSE and ASE ≥85% (n = 17), SSE and ASE <85% (n = 9) and SSE <85% with ASE ≥85% (n = 9). Binary regression showed that MMSE remained an important predictor for overestimation of sleep efficiency. CONCLUSION: Cognitive deficits in memory clinic patients appear to contribute to a poorer perception and/or an underreporting of objectively disturbed sleep. This could promote false negative subjective screening results in a diagnostic process in which a comprehensive sleep assessment is not routinely considered.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Sleep , Humans , Dementia/diagnosis
2.
Nervenarzt ; 88(11): 1221-1226, 2017 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28849271

ABSTRACT

Depression is common in old age but is often underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. Although psychotherapy is considered effective for treating elderly patients with depression, it is rarely applied in inpatient settings. Furthermore, treatment on inpatient units specialized for elderly patients and implementation of a psychotherapeutic treatment approach are currently more the exception. From this background, a multiprofessional inpatient behavioral treatment program (MVT) for elderly depressed patients was developed at a specialized unit of a university-affiliated regional psychiatric hospital. The MVT is based on specific and modularized group therapies accompanied by individual therapeutic interventions. While the provision of group therapies (such as psychotherapy, social skills training, relaxation training, euthymic and mindfulness-based methods, exercise and occupational therapy as well as psychoeducational sessions for relatives) is assigned to specific professional groups, a joint multiprofessional treatment planning is of central relevance. First evaluations of different treatment components support the high acceptability of the MVT and highlight that psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment programs for the elderly are feasible. Further research is required to investigate the clinical efficacy of psychotherapy in elderly depressive inpatients.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Patient Admission , Patient Care Team , Psychotherapy/methods , Aged , Behavior Therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Exercise Therapy , Family Therapy/methods , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Occupational Therapy , Psychotherapy, Group , Social Work
3.
Schmerz ; 28(2): 141-6, 2014 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24643753

ABSTRACT

It has now been established that sleep deprivation or fragmentation causes hyperalgesia which cannot be explained by a general change in somatosensory perception. However, it has not yet been clarified which of the sleep stages are most relevant for this effect. The seemingly paradoxical effects of sleep deprivation on pain-evoked brain potentials on the one hand and the subjective pain report on the other hand suggest complex changes in gating mechanisms. As the effects on pain and affect can be dissociated a common mechanism of action seems unlikely. Data from animal studies suggest that hyperalgesia due to sleep deprivation might be particularly strong under preexisting neuropathic conditions. Together with results from animal research the finding that endogenous pain modulation (CPM) is impaired by sleep deprivation suggests that the serotoninergic system mediates the effect of sleep deprivation on pain perception. However, other neurotransmitters and neuromodulators still have to be considered. The clinically relevant question arises why sleep deprivation induces hyperalgesia more easily in certain individuals than in others and why this effect then has a longer duration?


Subject(s)
Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Hyperalgesia/psychology , Pain/physiopathology , Pain/psychology , Sleep Deprivation/physiopathology , Sleep Deprivation/psychology , Animals , Brain/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Humans , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Neuralgia/psychology , Neurotransmitter Agents/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Sensory Gating/physiology , Serotonin/physiology , Sleep Deprivation/complications
4.
Eur J Pain ; 18(7): 989-98, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24395283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common headache disorder that can vary menstrually in women and has been linked to an impairment of endogenous pain inhibitory systems. One of these endogenous pain inhibitory systems, namely conditioned pain modulation (CPM; formerly diffuse noxious inhibitory controls-like), has been shown to be affected by the menstrual cycle. The aim of this study was to examine CPM over the menstrual cycle in migraineurs and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty healthy women and 32 female migraineurs were examined on days 1, 4, 14 and 22 of the menstrual cycle. Detection and pain thresholds for electrocutaneous stimuli were first assessed at baseline. Second, tonic heat stimuli were applied concurrently to the electrical stimuli, and the difference in electrical thresholds to baseline were analysed as indicating CPM inhibition. RESULTS: Migraineurs revealed higher detection thresholds than the control group but similar pain thresholds for the electrical current. Likewise, pain sensitivity for tonic heat stimulation also did not differ between groups. With regard to our main hypotheses, we found that CPM inhibition neither differed between migraineurs and healthy volunteers nor varied over the menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CPM inhibition is not altered in female migraineurs; thus, it is questionable whether CPM really plays a role in the development of migraine or whether migraine leads to a dysfunctional CPM inhibition.


Subject(s)
Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Pain Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...