Diagnostic accuracy of RBC scintigraphy and CTA for detection of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) through noninvasive modalities is very important in the successful management of LGIB. RBC scintigraphy and CT have a role in the detection of LGIB and guiding the management of patient by localization of the bleeding site. However, only a small number of studies have evaluated the role of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the diagnosis of LGIB. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of RBC scintigraphy and CT in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious of LGIB. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant keywords, and articles published through 30 April 2022, were included. Using endoscopy or surgical outcomes as the reference standard, the numbers of true and false positives and true and false negatives were extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy - including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary ROC (SROC) curve - were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three studies comprising 171 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using RBC scintigraphy were 0.787 (95% CI, 0.643-0.893), 0.289 (95% CI, 0.164-0.443), 1.214 (95% CI, 0.923-1.597) and 0.576 (95% CI, 0.296-1.121) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.73. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the detection of LGIB using CT were 0.931 (95% CI, 0.772-0.992), 0.870 (95% CI, 0.737-0.951), 6.085 (95% CI, 0.840-44.097), 0.126 (95% CI, 0.006-2.509) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.095. CONCLUSION: RBC scintigraphy has overall good sensitivity and CTA has excellent sensitivity specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio in the detection of LGIB in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for LGIB.CTA along with RBC scintigraphy can be used algorithmically to rule out patients who do not have a localization for the site of LGIB thereby helping these patients to avoid invasive procedures like endoscopy or surgical explorations.

Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in Stage I Essential Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial.

Objective: The present study assessed the feasibility of a definitive placebo-controlled trial for evaluating individualized homeopathy (IH) in stage I hypertension (HTN). Design: Double-blind, randomized (IH: 34, placebo: 34), placebo-controlled, parallel arms, pilot trial. Settings/Location: National Institute of Homoeopathy, India. Subjects: Patients suffering from stage I HTN. Interventions: IH and identical-looking placebo. Outcome measures: Feasibility issues, blood pressure (BP) and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile-2 (MYMOP-2) were assessed for 6 months. Results: The recruitment and retention rates were 44.4% and 85.3%, respectively. Group differences were seemingly higher in the IH group than in the placebo group. Conclusions: Despite challenges in recruitment, an adequately powered efficacy trial appears feasible in the future.

Efficacy of individualized homeopathic treatment of insomnia: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is the most common sleep-related complaint associated with impaired day-time functioning, reduced quality of life, increased morbidity and substantial societal cost. We evaluated whether individualized homeopathy (IH) could produce significant effect beyond placebo in treatment of insomnia. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two parallel arms trial, 60 patients were randomized to receive either IH/verum or control/placebo (1:1). Patient-administered sleep diary (6 items; 1: latency to fall asleep, 2: minutes awake in middle of night, 3: minutes awake too early, 4: hours spent in bed, 5: total sleep time in hours, and 6: sleep efficiency) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were taken as the primary and secondary outcomes respectively, measured at baseline, and after 3 months. RESULTS: Five patients dropped out (verum: 2, control: 3). Intention to treat sample (n = 60) was analyzed. Trial arms were comparable at baseline. In the verum group, except sleep diary item 3 (P = 0.371), rest of the outcomes improved significantly (all P < 0.01). In the control group, there were significant improvements in diary item 6 and ISI score (P < 0.01) and just significant improvement in item 5 (P = 0.018). Group differences were significant for items 4, 5 and 6 (P < 0.01) and just significant (P = 0.014) for ISI score with moderate to large effect sizes; but non-significant (P > 0.01) for rest of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: IH seemed to produce significantly better effect than placebo. Rigorous trials and independent replications are warranted.