Long-Term Prognostic Significance of High-Sensitive Troponin I Increase during Hospital Stay in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Background and Objectives: A topic already widely investigated is the negative prognostic value regarding the extent of high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) increases among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and obstructive coronary atherosclerosis compared to a group of patients with MI and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA). Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value concerning the extent of hs-TnI increase on clinical outcomes among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We selected 337 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. The patients were divided in three groups according to the extent of hs-TnI increase during hospitalization (increase ≤5-times above the limit of the upper norm, >5 and ≤20-times, and >20-times). The study endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; cerebral stroke and transient ischemic attacks, MI, coronary artery revascularization, either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting and all-cause mortality). Results: During the mean follow-up period of 516.1 ± 239.8 days, using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, significantly higher mortality rates were demonstrated among patients from the group with the greatest hs-TnI increase compared to the remaining groups (p = 0.01) and borderline values for MACCE (p = 0.053). Multivariable cox regression analysis did not confirm hs-TnI among factors related to increased MACCE or all-cause mortality rates. Conclusion: While a relationship between clinical outcomes and the extent of the hs-TnI increase among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis remains, it does not seem to be not as strong as it is in patients with obstructive coronary atherosclerosis.

Low molecular weight heparin in surgical valve procedures: When and how much for an optimal prophylaxis?

BACKGROUND: Periprocedural antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgical valve procedures (SVP) is insufficiently investigated. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been considered as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, safety and efficacy of this prophylaxis strategy is unknown. This study aimed to investigate safety and efficacy of periprocedural LMWH prophylaxis and determine optimal dosage and timing for periprocedural cessation and initiation. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective, single-center observational analysis of 388 patients who underwent SVP (valve replacement or valvuloplasty) between 2015 and 2016. In-hospital endpoints were bleeding, transfusions, reoperation due to bleeding, and thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Giving the first dose of LMWH on the day of SVP was a risk factor for bleeding (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001), transfusions (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; p = 0.008) and reoperation due to bleeding (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.28; p < 0.001), with > 40 mg/day as a predictor. A higher dosage of LMWH premedication was an independent risk factor for bleeding (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.03) and transfusion (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.01), with > 60 mg/day as a predictor for these events. LMWH dosed within 24 h prior to SVP increased the risk of transfusion (AUC 0.636; 95% CI 0.496-0.762; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is an important early concern after surgical valve procedures. Safety and efficacy of periprocedural prophylaxis with LMWH depends on dosage and the timing of its administration. The most optimal periprocedural prophylaxis in the SVP population appears to be LMWH in dosage of 40-60 mg/day, which is recommended for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, ceased at least one day before SVP.

New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft - 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry).

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ±â€¯8.9y), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%). Among patients treated with new-DES compared with BMS, there was a lower risk of MACCE (21.4% vs. 28.3%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarction (MI) (6.3% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was observed in favor of new-DES (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.030; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.92, p = 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.