Evaluation of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: Subjects were patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined high-risk PCa treated with either RP or RT plus ADT. We calculated BCR-free survival in patients with those treatments and evaluated risk factor against BCR. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients, 71 RP and 43 RT plus ADT, were evaluated. A total of 59 and 20.9% of patients experienced BCR in the RP and RT treatment groups, respectively. The 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities improved significantly for patients who received RT compared to those who received RP (81.3 vs 37.3%, P<0.001). According to the number of risk factors, 59.2% of patients in the RP and 51.2% of patients in the RT treatment groups were classified with one risk factor (P<0.014). The 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities for patients treated with RP were 46.6 and 21.7% for one and multiple risk factors, respectively (P=0.008). On univariate analysis, only the number of risk factors had a significant impact on the risk of BCR. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities between one and multiple risk factors in patients treated with RT. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with RP, a marked heterogeneity existed in the oncological outcomes. Based on these findings, the number of risk factors should be emphasized to decide the optimal treatments for patients with high-risk PCa.

[Evaluation of the management of blunt renal trauma and indication for surgery].

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate management of renal trauma is still controversial. Many of the patients have minor injuries and conservative treatment can achieve excellent outcomes without any complications. For major injuries of deep lacerations or ruptures, we have been performing early surgical treatment to salvage the kidney in the selected cases after the precise evaluation of the injury. To obtain the optimal management options, we evaluated the clinical results of our procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, which included 106 cases of blunt renal trauma with evident etiology over the past 22 years and 9 months. The severity of the injury was evaluated mainly by CT scanning. The indication of renal exploration included persistent renal bleeding, large hematoma around the kidney, dislocated fragments, nonviable tissue, massive urinary extravasation and vascular injury. With the patients who required an operation, we first controlled the bleeding by clamping the hilar vessels. Then, the final decision whether to repair or remove the kidney was made based on the direct inspection of the injured kidney after the complete removal of the hematoma. The severity of renal trauma was classified by the classifications found in The Organ Injury Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were managed conservatively without any interventions, while 22 surgical repairs and 21 nephrectomies were performed. Of the 63 patients, 35 patients (81.4%) were operated on within 2 days after the injury. Judging from systolic blood pressure, red cell count, blood loss during surgery and transfusion requirements, surgically treated patients were more severely injured than conservatively treated patients. And nephrectomized patients than surgically repaired patients. All the surgically repaired cases were confirmed to have preserved renal functions postoperatively. In all of the 50 patients with Grade I injuries, conservative treatment was successful. Eight out of the 19 Grade II and III cases, who were indicated for kidney exploration because of multiple lacerations or considerable bleeding, were also successfully repaired. Localized hematoma with no urine leakage, even when it was large, settled spontaneously without complication. For the 37 Grade IV and V injuries, including 4 cases with hilar injuries, we implemented conservative procedures on 2 patients, surgical repair on 14 patients and nephrectomy on 21 patients. In the conservatively treated cases, one deep laceration with relatively large, but localized, hematoma, and minimal urine extravasation healed spontaneously. Atrophy of the segment and hypertension developed in the other ruptured kidney with dislocated fragments, large hematoma and urine leakage. This kidney, which also required later surgical exploration, did have good parenchymal blood flow. Hilar injury cases were all resulted in nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: In most of our cases the indication for surgical exploration or nephrectomy based on our criteria seemed to be properly decided. Several cases, though, might have received overtreatment. Recent advances in evaluations and strategies of renal trauma have decreased the need for surgical exploration. This may have overreached the indication for conservative management. Severely injured kidneys may be managed conservatively because in most cases bleeding settles after the full formation of large hematoma within the Gerota's fascia. In such cases, though, no one can predict whether the injury will heal spontaneously or not, and, moreover, whether a complication will develop or not. We think that the optimal management of the patient requires an accurate evaluation of the injured kidney. Therefore the indication for surgical exploration should be made based on the degree of the injury.