Bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate via chambers/masks in young children.

We determined lung bioavailability of a fluticasone propionate (FP) pressurised metred-dose inhaler (Flovent HFA; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) administered via AeroChamber Plus (Monaghan Medical, Plattsburgh, NY, USA) with Facemask and Babyhaler (GlaxoSmithKline) valved holding chambers (VHCs) using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Children from 1 to <4 yrs of age with stable asthma but a clinical need for inhaled corticosteroid therapy were administered 88 µg FP hydrofluoroalkane (2 × 44 µg) twice daily delivered through the two devices in an open-label, randomised crossover manner for 8 days each. Patients were randomised to one of three sparse sampling schedules for blood collection throughout the 12-h dosing interval on the 8th day of each treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis. The area under the FP plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was determined for each regimen. 17 children completed the study. The population mean AUC following FP with AeroChamber Plus with Facemask was 97.45 pg·h·mL(-1) (95% CI 85.49-113.32 pg·h·mL(-1)) and with Babyhaler was 51.55 pg·h·mL(-1) (95% CI 34.45-64.46 pg·h·mL(-1)). The relative bioavailability (Babyhaler/AeroChamber Plus) was 0.53 (95% CI 0.30-0.75). Clinically significant differences in lung bioavailability were observed between the devices. VHCs are not interchangeable, as differences in drug delivery to the lung may occur. A population pharmacokinetic approach can be used to determine lung bioavailability of FP.

Bioavailability of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate aqueous nasal sprays.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the systemic exposure for intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal sprays (ANS) in terms of serum and urinary cortisol parameters and plasma pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects completed this three-way, cross-over study. They received FPANS (50 microg/spray), MFANS (50 microg/spray) or placebo ANS, eight sprays per nostril every 8 h for 4 days. Cortisol measurements were made at baseline and day 4. FP and MF plasma concentrations were also measured on day 4. RESULTS: MFANS produced similar mean plasma AUC (123 pmol/l h) to FPANS (112 pmol/l h). Despite the use of high doses, necessary to generate adequate pharmacokinetic data, only minor reductions in cortisol parameters were found, with no difference between FPANS and MFANS. CONCLUSIONS: FP and MF have similar and very low systemic bioavailability when administered intranasally using a high-dose regimen. It is therefore unlikely that therapeutic doses of intranasal FP or MF will produce dissimilar or significant degrees of systemic exposure or systemic effects.

Comparison of the systemic availability of fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to compare the systemic exposure to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) after administration of either single or repeated dose regimens via dry powder and metered-dose inhalers in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers. BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of FP, a topically active glucocorticoid administered by inhalation for the treatment of asthma and rhinitis, are well characterised in healthy volunteers. As asthma is characterised by pathophysiological changes in the lung, it may be inappropriate to use data from studies in healthy volunteers to predict the deposition and absorption of FP in patients with asthma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pooled data from 13 pharmacokinetic studies showed that the systemic availability of FP (measured as area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve) after single or multiple administration by inhalation was 2 to 3 times lower in patients with asthma than in healthy volunteers. This observation correlated well with the systemic effects of FP in the 2 groups. Reduction in 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after inhalation of FP (determined in 9 of the studies) was greater in healthy volunteers than in patients with asthma. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression caused by systemic exposure to FP in adults with asthma is therefore substantially less than that in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: Differences in the deposition of FP in the lungs of patients with asthma, probably caused by obstructed inspiratory airflow, may explain this observation.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan suppositories following single and multiple doses in healthy volunteers.

A suppository formulation of the 5HT1 agonist sumatriptan could prove an important therapeutic option in migraine patients who dislike or poorly tolerate injectable therapy and where oral tablet administration is unsuitable because of severe migraine-related vomiting. Two independent double-blind, randomized clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan suppositories following ascending single doses (four different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-period, crossover, single-dose study, 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a suppository containing 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg on separate occasions 3-14 days apart. The suppositories were generally well tolerated; transient asthenia, drowsiness, and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events, and these were not dose-related. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of sumatriptan were proportional to dose from 25 to 100 mg; area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC infinity) values were proportional to dose except at the highest doses, when they were greater than those predicted from lower doses. For all doses, the tmax of sumatriptan occurred within 2.5 h, and the t1/2 was approximately 2 h. In the two-period, placebo-controlled, crossover, repeat-dose study, 12 healthy adult male subjects were randomized to receive either a 50-mg sumatriptan suppository or placebo suppository, administered rectally twice a day, for 11 doses (5 1/2 days). Adverse events were no more frequent with sumatriptan than with placebo, and stool guaiac, rectal examinations, and physical examinations remained normal. No significant differences were noted between Day 1 and Day 6 values in the AUC, Cmax, time of peak serum concentration (tmax), elimination half-life (t 1/2), fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe), or renal clearance (Clr) of sumatriptan or its pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite. Serum metabolite concentrations were two to three-fold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. No clinically significant accumulation of sumatriptan or its metabolite occurred. Overall, these studies show that sumatriptan administration via a suppository formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, results in sumatriptan Cmax values that are proportional to dose from 25 to 100 mg, and is not associated with accumulation of sumatriptan or its metabolite.

Effect of alosetron (a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) on the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol in schizophrenic patients.

Alosetron is under clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This study evaluated the effect of oral alosetron dosing on the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol, the latter being administered daily to 13 schizophrenic patients for 56 days. Alosetron 1 mg daily or placebo was given by random assignment for 2 weeks. After a two-week alosetron washout period (during which patients received placebo), patients received the alternate treatment for another two weeks. Serial blood samples were collected for high-performance liquid chromatography determination of plasma haloperidol, reduced haloperidol, and alosetron at selected times for 24 hours after administration of haloperidol and alosetron on study days 21 and 49. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of haloperidol in the presence of alosetron and placebo treatments were not significantly (P > .05) different: dose-normalized Cmax (6.40 versus 5.75 ng/mL), dose-normalized Cmin (2.00 versus 1.90 ng/mL), dose-normalized AUC (85.97 versus 68.48 ng.hr/mL), and CL/f (78.23 versus 104.7 L/hr). A two-compartment model was used to assess the concentration- and time-independent pharmacokinetics of haloperidol after multiple dosing. The model confirmed that there was no change in the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol when alosetron was administered concomitantly. Mean AUC ratios of reduced haloperidol to haloperidol (0.18) in the presence of alosetron were similar to values obtained in the absence of alosetron, indicating that alosetron had no influence on the metabolism of haloperidol. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of alosetron were similar to those in previous studies in healthy subjects.

Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of oral ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with fractionated total-body irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate oral ondansetron in the prevention of total-body irradiation (TBI)-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Twenty patients who received 4 days of TBI as part of their preparative regimen before bone marrow transplantation were randomized to receive either 8-mg oral doses of ondansetron or placebo. Administration of drug was double-blinded. Initial rescue therapy consisted of intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg following two or more emetic episodes between successive fractions of TBI or five total emetic episodes during the 4 days of therapy. If, after receipt of i.v. ondansetron, patients had two or more emetic episodes between fractions of TBI or five total emetic episodes, additional antiemetics were administered. RESULTS: Patients who received oral ondansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes compared with those who received placebo (P = .005) over the entire 4-day study period. Oral ondansetron was also significantly superior to placebo with respect to the time of onset of emesis or rescue (P = .003). Six of 10 patients treated with oral ondansetron completed the study without additional antiemetic therapy, while none of 10 patients who received placebo completed the study without rescue antiemetic therapy. Six placebo patients who received initial rescue therapy with i.v. ondansetron required no additional antiemetics. No relationships were apparent between peak ondansetron concentration (Cmax) or area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and number of emetic episodes. CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron is an effective therapy for the prevention of emesis induced by TBI.

Steady-state fluctuation and variability of betaxolol and atenolol plasma levels.

Twenty-four nonsmoking male volunteers took 50 mg atenolol or 10 mg betaxolol orally once a day for 9 days in a two-period, four-sequence, randomized, crossover study. Plasma concentrations reached steady state after day 5. Percent fluctuation in plasma concentration defined as (Cmax-Cmin)/Cavg (% fluctuation 1) was 97% on day 9 for betaxolol and 343% for atenolol; thus atenolol fluctuation was more than threefold that of betaxolol. A 10-fold difference in plasma level fluctuation was observed when fluctuation was defined as (Cmax-Cmin)/Cmin (% fluctuation 2). The intersubject variances for % fluctuation 1 and % fluctuation 2 were 4.1 and 85.5 times greater for atenolol than for betaxolol; these differences were marginally statistically significant for % fluctuation 1 and significant for % fluctuation 2. The intrasubject variabilities for area under the curve and plasma level fluctuations were statistically greater for atenolol than for betaxolol. Atenolol intrasubject variances were 25 and 271 times greater than for betaxolol for % fluctuation 1 and % fluctuation 2, respectively. Thus, betaxolol exhibited less fluctuation in plasma levels with substantially less intersubject and intrasubject variability. These factors would be expected to provide a more consistent therapeutic response and more dependable dosage adjustment.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of lomefloxacin after sequentially increasing oral doses.

The pharmacokinetics of five dose levels of lomefloxacin (100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg) were examined in a single-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 40 subjects. There were eight subjects in each group: five received active drug and three received placebo; each subject was given only one dose. All subjects completed the study, and lomefloxacin was well tolerated at all doses. No drug crystals were noted in the urine at 3 and 6 h after the dose. The mean maximum concentration in serum (Cmax) ranged from 1.11 to 7.46 micrograms/ml for the 100- to 800-mg doses, respectively, and the AUC increased proportionally with the dose. The mean time to Cmax (Tmax) values averaged 64.8 +/- 28.8 min. The elimination half-life and plasma clearance averaged 7.7 +/- 0.52 h and 259 +/- 37 ml/min, respectively. Mean concentrations in urine were highest during the first 4 h after the dose and ranged from 104 to 713 micrograms/ml following the 100- and 800-mg doses, respectively. Concentrations above 20 micrograms/ml in urine were observed in most subjects over 24 h at the three lower doses and averaged over 120 micrograms/ml during the 12- to 24-h interval at the 400-mg dose, thus supporting once-per-day dosing. Excretion rates from urine and the cumulative amount excreted increased in a dose-related fashion. Renal clearance decreased moderately at the higher doses. Thus, lomefloxacin was well tolerated, and dose proportionality was demonstrated by most pharmacokinetic parameters. The 400-mg dose produced concentrations in plasma and urine above the MIC for susceptible pathogens.

Umbilical versus peripheral tobramycin administration.

This study evaluated the disposition of tobramycin (T) after umbilical artery catheter (UAC), intravenous (i.v.), and intramuscular administration to a group of 12 premature neonates. Patients varied in gestational age (31-42 weeks) and weight (1.76-3.98 kg). Each neonate received a 2 mg/kg dose of T at 12-h intervals for 2-15 days. Multiple blood samples after the first and last doses of T, as well as daily measurements, were made during the course of therapy. Analysis of drug concentration data revealed a biphasic distribution of T, which required a two-compartment model for description. Mean values for the alpha and beta elimination phases, t1/2 beta, Vc, and Vdss after the first dose of T were 7.604 h-1, 0.087 h-1, 11.18 h, 0.214 L/kg, and 0.645 L/kg, respectively. Average drug clearance (ClT) increased during therapy from 71 to 103 ml/min, associated with an increase in the renal function of patients. Serum concentrations of T were out of the therapeutic range in 50% of study patients. The variability of drug clearance in the neonate requires the measurement of T concentration in order to ensure safe and effective therapy.

Liquid chromatographic determination of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in plasma and breast milk.

A sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) procedure was developed for determination of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in plasma and breast milk. The compounds were isolated from the biological specimen by extraction, the organic phase was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was redissolved in mobile phase [acetonitrile: 0.002 M H2SO4 (1:1)]. The resultant solution was then injected into an HPLC system utilizing a C18 reversed-phase analytical column and a variable-wavelength detector set at 205 nm. Under these conditions the method has a sensitivity of 20 ng/mL using 1 mL of plasma or milk. The within-run coefficient of variation for both compounds varied between 6.2 and 8.9% within the concentration range tested. Applicability of the method was demonstrated in a nursing mother who received multiple oral doses of propoxyphene.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of theophylline following enema and suppository administration in man.

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of theophylline from a commercial oral elixir of theophylline, a rectal suppository of aminophylline, and a rectal enema of theophylline monoethanolamine was compared in six normal subjects. Using a complete crossover design, the fasted subjects received a single dose of each dosage form. Blood and saliva samples were collected at frequent time intervals for 24 h, and the plasma assayed for theophylline by a specific thin-layer chromatography densitometric method. No statistically significant differences existed among the three dosage forms with respect to Cmax and AUC corrected for the elimination rate constant and the dose (mg kg-1). However, tmax was significantly larger for the suppository. While the rate of absorption was significantly slower for the suppository, no differences in the extent of absorption existed among the three dosage forms. A one-compartment open model with apparent first-order absorption adequately described the plasma concentration-time data for the elixir and enema, whereas the suppository data were best fitted by a one-compartment open model with apparent zero-order absorption and a lag time. A rate-limiting, concentration-independent release of drug from the base most likely accounts for the slow absorption of theophylline from the suppository. While the saliva:plasma ratio remained fairly constant for most of the study period, the large variability found during the absorption phase following drug administration limits the usefulness of this parameter as a monitor of theophylline plasma concentrations.

Excretion of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in breast milk.

Propoxyphene (P) and norpropoxyphene (NP) excretion in breast milk was studied in six healthy nursing mothers. Concentrations of P and NP in breast milk and plasma were quantitated by an HPLC method. Plasma P t 1/2 s in mothers averaged 4.40 hr. P and NP breast milk concentrations generally followed plasma levels. NP/P averaged 2.69 in plasma and 2.73 in breast milk. While there was substantial inter- and intrasubject variability, the ratio of drug in the milk and plasma averaged 0.417 and 0.382 for P and NP. These similarities in distribution in breast milk were also reflected in elimination. Clearances of P and NP in milk were of the same order (3.97 ml/hr) as were elimination t 1/2 s in milk in most subjects (mean = 3.68 hr for P and 5.49 hr for NP). Approximately twice as much NP was excreted in the milk, primarily because of the higher NP levels in plasma. Clearance of P and NP in breast milk also correlated strongly with breast milk volume. While little information is available concerning P and NP disposition in neonates, dosage estimates based on kinetic and pharmacologic assumptions suggest that the estimated amounts consumed by the neonate after the mother is given the recommended dose of the drug are not likely to result in toxic plasma levels.

Effect of food and an antacid on quinidine bioavailability.

Two 200 mg quinidine sulfate tablets were administered to nine healthy male subjects in the fasting state, immediately after a balanced meal, and with 30 ml of aluminum hydroxide gel using a complete crossover design. Serum and urine samples were taken over 32 and 60 h, respectively. Quinidine concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay specific for quinidine. Computer fitting of the data to several models indicated that a one-compartment model with zero-order absorption and a lag time best fit all the data. Quinidine elimination and urine pH were unaffected by the study conditions. While the maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) were unaffected by administration of quinidine with food or antacid, there was a 44 per cent increase (p less than 0.10) in time to Cmax (tmax) following quinidine administration with food. Thus, while the extent of quinidine absorption was unaffected by food or the antacid used, the rate of quinidine absorption was significantly reduced by food as reported earlier.

Factors affecting the plasma protein binding of verapamil and norverapamil in man.

The in vitro and vivo binding of the antiarrhythmic agent verapamil and its active metabolite norverapamil to human plasma proteins was determined under different conditions at 37 degrees C by equilibrium dialysis. The binding of verapamil was considerable (free fraction of about 0.10) and was independent of plasma concentration over the range of 50 ng/ml to 1500 ng/ml. Norverapamil was also extensively bound to plasma proteins. Verapamil binding was reduced significantly upon plasma dilution and upon addition of three of its major metabolites (norverapamil and metabolites A and B). Therapeutic concentrations of several drugs including disopyramide (12 micrograms/ml), diazepam (2 micrograms/ml), lidocaine (4 micrograms/ml), propranolol (150 ng/ml), and salicylate (250 microgram/ml) also significantly increased the free fraction of verapamil. The results of in vivo protein binding studies using plasma samples collected during a steady-state dosing interval from a patient receiving 80 mg of verapamil orally every 6 hr were similar to those obtained from vitro binding studies.

Nonlinear model for acetazolamide.

Intravenous bolus injections of 14C-labeled acetazolamide were made in rabbits. Plasma, urine, and washed red blood cell concentrations were measured, the latter indicating bound drug. AUTOAN and NONLIN were used to fit the plasma data to a linear two-compartment model. However, utilization of the urine and red blood cell data suggested that a nonlinear model was more appropriate. The developed nonlinear system uses a one-compartment model with two tissue-binding parameters. The system simultaneously fits three equations describing drug in the plasma, in the body, and bound to red blood cells, Six parameters were estimated. The initial plasma concentration and the maximum amount bound to tissue protein (minus red blood cell protein) correlated with dose. The dissociation constant from this protein fraction suggested that it is composed mainly of the enzyme, carbonic anhydrase. The dissociation constant for the red blood cell fraction suggested that the drug binds to other protein in addition to carbonic anhydrase. The elimination constants were quite similar, indicating little variation from one animal to another. Utilization of the concepts of site and mechanism of action in this model should be of considerable help in relating drug concentration to pharmacological resonse.

Relationship of pharmacokinetics to pharmacological response for acetazolamide.

Acetazolamide concentration values derived from a nonlinear model system were related to two pharmacological responses in the rabbit. Kidney response was measured by monitoring urine flow and sodium elimination. Ocular response was followed using an applanation tonometer. Maximum urine flow and sodium elimination occurring immediately after injection correlated with log dose. Urine flow dropped below control values along with a rise in osmolality, suggesting the involvement of antidiuretic hormone. Sodium elimination was correlated with plasma levels. Urine pH is thought to be involved in reducing accessibility of drug to carbonic anhydrase in the kidney. Maximum ocular response also was correlated with log dose. Ocular response was related to a protein fraction, which is believed to be mainly carbonic anhydrase. However, the duration of ocular response was related to the red blood cell protein fraction. Thus, drug activity could conceivably be regulated by monitoring a tissue that is not the site of action and can be sampled readily.