Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(8): 963-973, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35368129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The intersection of emergency medicine (EM) and palliative care (PC) has been recognized as an essential area of focus, with evidence suggesting that increased integration improves outcomes. This has resulted in increased research in EM PC. No current framework exists to help guide investigation and innovation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to convene a working group to develop a roadmap that would help provide focus and prioritization for future research. METHODS: Participants were identified based on clinical, operation, policy, and research expertise in both EM and PC and spanned physician, nursing, social work, and patient perspectives. The research roadmap setting process consisted of three distinct phases that were time staggered over 12 months and facilitated through three live video convenings, asynchronous input via an online document, and a series of smaller video convenings of work groups focused on specific topics. RESULTS: Gaps in the literature were identified and informed the four key areas for future research. Consensus was reached on these domains and the associated research questions in each domain to help guide future study. The key domains included work focused on the value imperative for PC in the emergency setting, models of care delivery, disparities, and measurement of impact and efficacy. Additionally, the group identified key methodological considerations for doing work at the intersection of EM and PC. CONCLUSIONS: There are several key domains and associated questions that can help guide future research in ED PC. Focus on these areas, and answering these questions, offers the potential to improve the emergency care of patients with PC needs.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Physicians , Consensus , Forecasting , Humans , Palliative Care
2.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 60(3): e28-e32, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32505643

ABSTRACT

Family meetings are fundamental to the practice of palliative medicine and serve as a cornerstone of intervention on the inpatient palliative care consultation service. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the structure and process of in-patient family meetings, owing to necessary but restrictive visitor policies that did not allow families to be present in the hospital. We describe implementation of telemedicine to facilitate electronic family (e-family) meetings to facilitate in-patient palliative care. Of 67 scheduled meetings performed by the palliative care service, only two meetings were aborted for a 97% success rate of scheduled meetings occurring. On a five-point Likert-type scale, the average clinician rating of the e-family meeting overall quality was 3.18 (SD, .96). Of the 10 unique family participants who agreed to be interviewed, their overall ratings of the e-family meetings were high. Over 80% of respondent families participants reported that they agreed or strongly agreed that they were able to ask all of their questions, felt comfortable expressing their thoughts and feelings with the clinical team, felt like they understood the care their loved one received, and that the virtual family meeting helped them trust the clinical team. Of patients who were able to communicate, 50% of family respondents reported that the e-family meeting helped them understand their loved one's thoughts and wishes.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Communication , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Family/psychology , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Professional-Family Relations , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 24(4): 460-7, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16787806

ABSTRACT

The acquired hypercoagulable states are responsible for a broad range of thrombotic and thromboembolic disorders. Symptoms and signs of acute ischemia or organ dysfunction will lead many of these patients to seek care in EDs. Proper diagnosis and therapy must be based on an understanding of epidemiology and pathophysiology. Immediate anticoagulation with heparin may not always be the treatment of choice; careful analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters is necessary to arrive at the safest and most effective course of action. Newer anticoagulants, including low-molecular-weight heparins and nonheparin compounds, are changing the therapeutic approach to many of these disorders.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/etiology , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Thrombosis/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...