An Integrated DAIDS Laboratory Oversight Framework: Application of the DAIDS GCLP Guidelines.

The Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) Guidelines establish a framework to guide the oversight of laboratories supporting DAIDS-sponsored clinical research or trials. Compliance with these guidelines promotes data reliability, consistency, validity, and the safety of the clinical research or trial participants and laboratory staff, as well as ensures adherence to regulatory requirements. This article describes the application of the DAIDS GCLP Guidelines, the DAIDS Integrated Laboratory Oversight Framework, and the coordinated efforts of the collaborative oversight team of laboratory experts to support and monitor the performance of over 175 participating laboratories worldwide. Data from two self-administered online surveys conducted in 2017 and 2023 assessed the laboratory staff's experience implementing the GCLP Guidelines. The results of the 2017 survey were instrumental in informing changes to GCLP audit activities and promoting harmonization in the approach to laboratory oversight. A key finding from the 2023 survey results is the preference for hybrid GCLP training encompassing face-to-face and online modules. Overall, both surveys acknowledged satisfaction with applying and implementing GCLP Guidelines. The need to effectively disseminate information about DAIDS laboratory oversight requirements to support the improved implementation of GCLP Guidelines was notable from both survey results. The collaborative team of laboratory experts and the integrated oversight approach promote knowledge-sharing and accountability to support the application of the GCLP Guidelines and compliance monitoring. The systematic implementation of the integrated laboratory oversight activities helped identify valuable lessons for improving laboratory performance and opportunities to strengthen quality oversight for laboratories participating in clinical research or trials. .

Casting a wider net: Immunosurveillance by nonclassical MHC molecules.

Most studies of T lymphocytes focus on recognition of classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or II molecules presenting oligopeptides, yet there are numerous variations and exceptions of biological significance based on recognition of a wide variety of nonclassical MHC molecules. These include αß and γδ T cells that recognize different class Ib molecules (CD1, MR-1, HLA-E, G, F, et al.) that are nearly monomorphic within a given species. Collectively, these T cells can be considered "unconventional," in part because they recognize lipids, metabolites, and modified peptides. Unlike classical MHC-specific cells, unconventional T cells generally exhibit limited T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) repertoires and often produce innate immune cell-like rapid effector responses. Exploiting this system in new generation vaccines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis (TB), other infectious agents, and cancer was the focus of a recent workshop, "Immune Surveillance by Non-classical MHC Molecules: Improving Diversity for Antigens," sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Here, we summarize salient points presented regarding the basic immunobiology of unconventional T cells, recent advances in methodologies to measure unconventional T-cell activity in diseases, and approaches to harness their considerable clinical potential.

Innovative approaches to track lymph node germinal center responses to evaluate development of broadly neutralizing antibodies in human HIV vaccine trials.

Phase 1 clinical studies will soon evaluate novel HIV-1 envelope immunogens targeting distinct 'germline' and memory B cell receptors to ultimately elicit HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) recently convened a panel of US-based expert scientists, clinicians, sponsors and ethicists to discuss the role of sampling draining lymph nodes within preventive HIV vaccine trials. The meeting addressed the importance of evaluating germinal center (GC) responses following immunization to predict bNAb potency and breadth, and reviewed key aspects of this procedure within the clinical research setting, including informed consent, adverse event monitoring, study participant acceptability, medical expertise and training. We review highlights from the meeting and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sampling lymph nodes by excisional biopsies compared to fine needle aspirations (FNA) in the context of prophylactic HIV vaccine trials.