Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Digit Imaging ; 26(4): 731-9, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23296913

ABSTRACT

This study aims to evaluate whether the distribution of vessels inside and adjacent to tumor region at three-dimensional (3-D) power Doppler ultrasonography (US) can be used for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors. 3-D power Doppler US images of 113 solid breast masses (60 benign and 53 malignant) were used in this study. Blood vessels within and adjacent to tumor were estimated individually in 3-D power Doppler US images for differential diagnosis. Six features including volume of vessels, vascularity index, volume of tumor, vascularity index in tumor, vascularity index in normal tissue, and vascularity index in surrounding region of tumor within 2 cm were evaluated. Neural network was then used to classify tumors by using these vascular features. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Student's t test were used to estimate the performance. All the six proposed vascular features are statistically significant (p < 0.001) for classifying the breast tumors as benign or malignant. The A Z (area under ROC curve) values for the classification result were 0.9138. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the diagnosis performance based on all six proposed features were 82.30 (93/113), 86.79 (46/53), 78.33 (47/60), 77.97 (46/59), and 87.04 % (47/54), respectively. The p value of A Z values between the proposed method and conventional vascularity index method using z test was 0.04.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/blood supply , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tumor Burden
2.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 28(10): 1301-10, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12467857

ABSTRACT

To increase the ability of ultrasonographic technology for the differential diagnosis of solid breast tumors, we describe a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system using neural networks for classification of breast tumors. Tumor regions and surrounding tissues are segmented from the physician-located region-of-interest (ROI) images by applying our proposed segmentation algorithm. Cooperating with the segmentation algorithm, three feasible features, including variance contrast, autocorrelation contrast and distribution distortion of wavelet coefficients, were extracted from the ROI images for further classification. A multilayered perceptron (MLP) neural network trained using error back-propagation algorithm with momentum was then used for the differential diagnosis of breast tumors on sonograms. In the experiment, 242 cases (including benign breast tumors from 161 patients and carcinomas from 82 patients) were sampled with k-fold cross-validation (k = 10) to evaluate the performance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area index for the proposed CADx system is 0.9396 +/- 0.0183, the sensitivity is 98.77%, the specificity is 81.37%, the positive predictive value is 72.73% and the negative predictive value is 99.24%. Experimental results showed that our diagnosis model performed very well for breast tumor diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Neural Networks, Computer , Breast Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography
3.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 28(7): 897-902, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12208332

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of using small training sets in computer-aided diagnostic systems (CAD) and to increase the capabilities of ultrasound (US) technology in the differential diagnosis of solid breast tumors. A total of 263 sonographic images of solid breast nodules, including 129 malignancies and 134 benign nodules, were evaluated by using a bootstrap technique with 10 original training samples. Texture parameters of a region-of-interest (ROI) were resampled with a bootstrap technique and a decision-tree model was used to classify the tumor as benign or malignant. The accuracy was 87.07% (229 of 263 tumors), the sensitivity was 95.35% (123 of 129), the specificity was 79.10% (106 of 134), the positive predictive value was 81.46% (123 of 151), and the negative predictive value was 94.64% (106 of 112). This analysis method provides a second opinion for physicians with high accuracy. The new method shows a potential to be useful in future application of CAD, especially when a large database cannot be obtained for training or a newly developed ultrasonic system has smaller sets of samples.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Decision Trees , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 28(7): 903-9, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12208333

ABSTRACT

We evaluated a series of pathologically proven breast tumors using an image-retrieval technique for classifying benign and malignant lesions. A total of 263 breast tumors (129 malignant and 134 benign) were retrospectively evaluated. The physician located regions-of-interest (ROI) of ultrasonic images and texture parameters (contrast, covariance and dissimilarity) were used in the process of the content-based image-retrieval technique. The accuracy of using the retrieval technique for classifying malignancies was 92.55% (236 of 255), the sensitivity was 94.44% (119 of 126), the specificity was 90.70% (117 of 129), the positive predictive value was 90.84% (119 of 131), and negative predictive value was 94.35% (117 of 124) for the proposed computer-aided diagnostic system. This computer-aided diagnosis system can provide a useful tool and its high negative predictive value could potentially help avert benign biopsies. It is unnecessary to perform any training procedures. This computer-aided diagnosis system can provide a second opinion for a sonographic interpreter; the main advantage in this proposed system is that we do not need any training. Historical cases can be directly added into the database and training of the diagnosis system again is not needed. With the growth of the database, more and more information can be collected and used as reference cases while performing diagnoses. This increases the flexibility of our diagnostic system.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Acad Radiol ; 9(7): 793-9, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12139093

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to determine whether a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system was suitable from one ultrasound (US) unit to another after parameters were adjusted by using intelligent selection algorithms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors used texture analysis and data mining with a decision tree model to classify breast tumors with different US systems. The databases of training cases from one unit and testing cases from another were collected from different countries. Regions of interest on US scans and co-variance texture parameters were used in the diagnosis system. Proposed adjustment schemes for different US systems were used to transform the information needed for a differential diagnosis. RESULTS: Comparison of the diagnostic system with and without adjustment, respectively, yielded the following results: accuracy, 89.9% and 82.2%; sensitivity, 94.6% and 92.2%; specificity, 85.4% and 72.3%; positive predictive value, 86.5% and 76.8%; and negative predictive value, 94.1% and 90.4%. The improvement in accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive value was statistically significant. Diagnostic performance was improved after the adjustment. CONCLUSION: After parameters were adjusted by using intelligent selection algorithms, the performance of the proposed CAD system was better both with the same and with different systems. Different resolutions, different setting conditions, and different scanner ages are no longer obstacles to the application of such a CAD system.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Algorithms , Decision Trees , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...