Prevalence and Risk Factors for Urinary Incontinence in Nulliparous Women: A Contemporary, Population-Based Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies of incontinence largely focus on parous women, and there are limited data regarding nulliparous women. Our objectives were to evaluate risk factors for urinary incontinence among a nationally representative, contemporary sample of nulliparous women of all ages in the United States and to describe the prevalence and subtypes of urinary incontinence and nocturia in this population. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional, population-based study used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles 2011-2018 to assemble a sample of nulliparous women 20-80 years old. Crude and adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression for the exposures of interest: body mass index (BMI), age, physical activity, prior hysterectomy, and current smoking. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and nocturia were estimated. RESULTS: Among 1,603 nulliparous women, prevalence of any urinary incontinence was 29.38%. Prevalence of stress, urgency, and mixed urinary incontinence and nocturia, respectively, were 27.68%, 19.64%, 10.57%, and 58.95%. Women with a BMI ≥25 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.23), at least 45 years (aOR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.31-5.83), and current smoking (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.07-2.49) had increased the odds of incontinence compared with women without these risk factors. When stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was considered alone, only women with a BMI ≥25 (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.20-2.31) and age at least 45 years (aOR, 3.17; 95% CI, 2.01-5.00) had increased odds of SUI compared with women without these risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary incontinence and nocturia are prevalent in nulliparous women, and age, elevated BMI, and current smoking may represent risk factors for incontinence in this population.

Patellofemoral Stabilization: Postoperative Redislocation and Risk Factors Following Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral instability is a common knee problem that is difficult to manage owing to its multifactorial etiology as well as the fact that predisposing pathoanatomic features vary from individual to individual. There is limited knowledge regarding the demographic and pathoanatomic risk factors or the relationship between these risk factors and the redislocation rate after surgical stabilization for this challenging condition. PURPOSE: To analyze the postoperative redislocation rates and the prevalence of demographic and pathoanatomic risk factors for patients undergoing a patellofemoral stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic recurrent patellofemoral instability underwent a soft tissue patellofemoral stabilization procedure. A total of 342 patellofemoral stabilization procedures (reconstruction, n = 256; imbrication, n = 86) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 24.3 months. Concomitant procedures were performed in accordance with the à la carte concept of addressing significant anatomic or biomechanical characteristics. Two surgical cohorts were analyzed separately for reconstruction or imbrication to address laxity of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Failure of the patellofemoral stabilization procedure was defined as postoperative redislocation of the patella. Prevalence of demographic and pathoanatomic risk factors was determined for all patients. Disease-specific patient-reported outcomes were assessed with the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII). RESULTS: A redislocation rate of 5.1% was identified for MPFL reconstruction and 20.9% for MPFL imbrication. For both MPFL procedures, age at time of surgery was significantly younger for the failed group as compared with the intact group. Postoperative BPII scores were significantly lower for patients who subsequently experienced a surgical failure as compared with intact surgery for both MPFL reconstruction (P = .048) and MPFL imbrication (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral stabilization with an à la carte approach to surgical selection demonstrated a low postoperative redislocation rate and good clinical results. Younger age at time of surgery was associated with surgical failure. This information may be used to guide surgical decision making and patient education.

Small Bowel Obstruction Secondary to Entrapment in a Minimally Displaced Acetabular Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a unique case of bowel entrapment within a minimally displaced acetabular fracture. Our patient was injured after a fall from height. He was able to walk with minimal pain, and presented to hospital the following day for symptoms consistent with bowel obstruction. Imaging demonstrated a transition point at the fracture site. He was taken for emergency surgical decompression, bowel repair, and irrigation of his hip. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel entrapment within a pelvic fracture is rare. Our case illustrates the importance of maintaining a high level of suspicion, despite fracture displacement, to allow early diagnosis and appropriate management.

Generalized joint hypermobility does not influence clinical outcomes following isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability.

PURPOSE: Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) has frequently been described as a risk factor for patellofemoral instability; however, only a few primary research studies have demonstrated any evidence of a relationship. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if isolated proximal soft tissue stabilization for patellofemoral instability is as successful in patients with GJH compared those without, as measured by disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL), symptom scores and functional outcomes. The secondary purpose was to determine if clinical and patient-reported outcomes were influenced by patient demographic factors in the presence of joint hypermobility. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, data were collected on 174/193 knees (92% follow-up) following an isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R). Patients with a Beighton score of 4 or greater were classified as positive for GJH, and any score of 3 or less was classified as negative. Pre- and post-operative Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) scores were compared using a two-sample t test to determine the influence of GJH on QOL. The relationship between the Beighton score, and demographic and clinical factors was explored using correlational analysis. Functional testing including balance and single-leg hop testing was conducted 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Limb symmetry and mean limb-to-limb performance differences were calculated. RESULTS: In this cohort of isolated MPFL reconstructions, 55.1% had a positive Beighton score. There were seven surgical failures (3.6%). There was no evidence of a relationship between a positive Beighton score and pre-operative BPII scores, post-operative BPII scores or post-operative symptom scores. GJH did not correlate significantly with any post-operative functional testing measures. A positive Beighton score was inversely related to patient age and more prevalent in females. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that the presence of GJH did not influence disease-specific quality of life, physical symptom score or functional outcomes following MPFL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.