ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are used widely for their high luminous efficiency and durability. We developed a novel prototype high definition endoscope with white LEDs and evaluated the image quality it produced against a commercial endoscope with conventional light source. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The specifications of both colonoscopes were identical, except for the LED light source at the tip of the prototype. We examined 20 patients with rectal or sigmoid colon lesions and the image quality was evaluated in 40 images (one image from the LED colonoscope and one from the conventional colonoscope for each lesion) by three endoscopists. We additionally evaluated the 17 videos recorded with the LED colonoscope that were available. Image quality, mucosal and vascular color, and luminous distribution and intensity were scored on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: The mean score for vascular color given by one evaluator was significantly higher using the LED colonoscope than using the conventional colonoscope. The mean scores for mucosal color and luminous intensity from another evaluator were significantly lower with the LED colonoscope than with the conventional colonoscope. There were no significant differences in the luminous distribution scores for any of the evaluators. The image quality of the videos was evaluated as being similar with both colonoscopes. CONCLUSIONS: Image quality from the LED and conventional colonoscopes were similar, although the luminous intensity of the LEDs is inferior to that of the conventional light source at the present time.
Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopes , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Image Enhancement , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Colonoscopy/instrumentation , Colonoscopy/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Image Enhancement/methods , Japan , Light , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Video RecordingABSTRACT
We investigated whether near-ultraviolet light emitted from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) effects Helicobacter pylori viability and whether this new method can potentially apply to eradication therapy. Three H. pylori strains were used for near-ultraviolet (UV) LED irradiation experiments. Viability of isolates exposed to near-UV light was compared with controls by counting colony forming units. A time-dependent bactericidal effect of near-UV light was definitely observed. LED irradiation with near-UV light showed effective bactericidal activity against H. pylori strains. Eradication therapy with LED might provide a new avenue of treatment in patients refractory to eradication due to antibiotic resistance and/or adverse effects of antibiotics.
Subject(s)
Helicobacter pylori/radiation effects , Microbial Viability/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays , Colony Count, Microbial , Helicobacter pylori/growth & developmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are being used for a variety of new uses because of their cost-effectiveness and durability. We therefore considered using white LEDs as a light source for GI endoscopes to simplify the endoscopic system. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of an LED-illuminated colonoscope. DESIGN: Pilot study of the LED colonoscope in healthy human volunteers and patients with colorectal lesions. SETTING: Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan. INTERVENTIONS: We performed a total colonoscopy for 2 healthy volunteers and a sigmoidoscopy for 15 patients with colorectal lesions by using both LED and conventional colonoscopes. We assessed the feasibility and safety of the LED colonoscope by using a 5-grade scale. The 30 images of 15 colorectal lesions obtained by using each endoscope were evaluated in a blind, randomized order by 2 endoscopists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The mean scores of the LED colonoscope for the operability, ease of manipulation, image quality, and safety. RESULTS: We manufactured a prototype LED colonoscope with white LEDs on its tip. The LED colonoscope did not require an external light source or light-guide fiber bundle. The operability and ease of manipulation of the LED colonoscope were evaluated as similar to those of the conventional colonoscope. The color of the colonic mucosa and the vascular pattern were clearly visualized in the volunteers. For the 15 colorectal lesions, the mean score for image quality was not significantly different between the colonoscopes. The study was performed safely without any incident. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an LED colonoscope is feasible, and LED illumination may simplify the endoscope system.
